this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
32 points (75.0% liked)

World News

54784 readers
2924 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On reddit people are discussing the very quick cementing of this new truth, where everything can retroactively be waved off as having been AI.

People talk about the loss of certainty on everything ever since AI became a significant factor.

I disagree, it would be pandemonium if everything needs double checking and nothing is real. I think there is an obvious solution:

Make it into law that any official statement is assumed true unless it's redacted by the subject within a set amount of time.

Make it so people have an appeal window to any news outlet, with heavy consequences for platforms that do not redact.

We cannot be living in psychosis bizzarroland, and if Bibi says he's alive then take the countries word for it.

Let's say someone claims with a video that Trump is dead and replaced by a clone. Why would we allow for people to believe in that kind of nonsense which is obviously meant to divide people and turn a lot of them into crazies. If the administration would claim it's untrue, then that should be published as truth using no uncertain terms: article x was deepfakes

Anyone who claims differently afterwards is perpetuating lies and should be held accountable

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Send him to the Hague. Then, I'll know he's real.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Take the country’s word for it? Some of those politicians are the biggest liars of all! Trump, Putin, Netanyahu etc couldn’t lie straight in bed!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, I feel like people are up oting the headline without reading OPs rant they included with it...

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm going to bet that he's hiding somewhere, because he doesn't want to end like the Khomeini or on trial. So his propaganda team put out rumors that he's dead and then they released obviously fake videos to cause distractions and confusions, and then later they're going to say no actually he's dead with his family so the world forgets about them and they're out free in their safe haven.

In the end a specimen like him does not end zionism or it's atrocities, there's plenty others like him.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

he did run away the first time he hit Iran to about retaliation. he flew to another country so only his subjects are harmed

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Yup that's what I heard back then.

[–] dreamless_day@feddit.org 1 points 21 hours ago

Would be pretty great honestly. It gives autocratic rulers a way out without worrying to be hunted by some past enemies - given they aren’t narcissists that simply want to rule till the bitter end.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If there are norms saying content is true until proven otherwise as you say.... Welll... That can also be exploited the other way around. I swear it's not me abusing those minors. It was AI. I swear no it's not me cheating my partner, it's AI. It's not me caught saying something compromising over what I thought was a closed microphone, it was AI.

I see what you are trying to do but this is a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of situation.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Wild open access to vast reliable information has to be a social anomaly. I think the US will basically rewrite the Internet to promote national interest. It's worked well for China. I think they can basically control the population with an app.

Basically Internet becomes TV. It's entertaining and could be educational, but it is mostly useful to help people find sales and remember to work hard and respect their financial betters.

The Internet had scads of potential, still does, but imagine how radio enthusiasm changed from two way to broadcast communication.

So, it'll just be like the early ninties again? People had similar feelings about digital technology being easy to manipulate.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

An interesting theory and possible too. I'm a bit ignorant and I'm aware my skepticism is based on that gap knowledge, so here I ask: when did China implement these reforms? Was the Internet already widespread and part of everyone's lives as it is today for most western countries? And with regards to radio, did we ever reach a point where everyone had access to radio for communication both ways 24/7, as is the case with internet today? What I'm trying to say is I don't see a resource being reclaimed back, simply cut short just in time. Perhaps I'm too naive and hopeful but I don't see the same happening as smoothly with internet today.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's a terrible idea. Administrations would have to issue statements 24/7.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You're not wrong, but, eh. I wanna see the obviously-fake-statements by obviously-not-trump. This might get interesting.

Good that should keep them busy

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“That’s a bad idea because I think it would be hard” You’re presuming that they wouldn’t have to avoid lying as much.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

OK, let me put it this way: I set up 50 shell newspapers that push 100 articles per day along the line of "Politician A is a reptilian", "Government Y is hiding aliens", etc. Do you really think it is productive work for an administration to a) find these statements, b) research the validity (after all an otherwise unknown agency could really be hiding aliens), c) rebute or confirm the statement and d) enforce the rebuttal?

Pandora's Box was opened just before the worst administration to open it under.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

This world has reached quite a level of absurdity. Me are no longer in the information age and have entered the age of disinformation.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

🌎🧑‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Schrodingers Big Brother.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

well zuckerborg is an android, i would ben surprised if zuck had him replaced with an android too.

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are we.. serious here? You think an Android replaced Mark?

No judgement just checking

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Zuck has been looking uncharacteristically human lately.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Probably one of musk's, it's not very convincing.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Okay, now, do any of you think it truly matters? The geopolitical objectives of the settler state of Israel, just like the settler collection of states called the USA, have always been known and strictly adhered to regardless of who's the acting head scapegoat, right? Dead or not, Israelis, just like many Americans, are a bloodthirsty, amoral, sociopathic group of people. They could've been just regular white folks had they been raised in a different environment, maybe, but they weren't and that's the reality of things. Call me pessimistic if you want but I don't think things will change with Satanyahu dead, just like things haven't changed in the direction of American geopolitics (they're just more restrained now [and at times more violent since the walls are closing in] because of the rising multipolar world and the fact that, being amoral and selfish beings, corruption [read: inefficiency] is on every level of government).