this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38511 readers
1190 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A while ago I asked whether you are a do the good thing first or save it for later sort of person, like eat the best part or whatever.

Now I’m curious if it was a zombie apocalypse, would that change your calculation?

So not in daily life, but if you found something good but you know you’ll likely die soon.

Do you consume it all now (not just food, but media or friendship), or do you dole it out to yourself to make it last?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

With drugs? Use it all now. Its how you avoid chemical addictions. Stretching out your drugs so you have a little every day in fear of running out is how a little bit every day turns into a lot everyday witbout noticing. Whereas something like percocets that you get from someone filling a script once a month, you do them all the weekend you get them and dont do any for the next 28 days, and youll be able to stiff arm any chemical dependencies at a distance for far longer.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

based on my gaming style, i finish the game having never used my rare consumables because the time never seems quite right.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm increasingly of the opinion that finite consumables are bad game design.

It's bad design because it fails to account for that exact psychology you described - us humans are loss-averse creatures, and so we hoard them without any benefit.

Much better systems IMO are those which have consumables that naturally replenish over time like mana, or that you fill between fights like the estus flasks in souls games when you rest at a campfire.

These are better because they still challenge the player with managing limited resources, except it's only limited for the duration of a fight or area, not across the entire game like finite consumables are. It encourages players to use them because they know they'll get it back, and indeed if you don't use your mana pool when it's right there to use, then you're underperforming.

So yeah. Finite consumables were a natural addition in the early days of gaming which model how real life works, but these days we've got much better and more engaging ways of handling the same problem.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 54 minutes ago

Per-encounter resource used are generally better for me, yes.

It's one of my big problems with DND. Almost the whole thing is centered around per-day so there's this constant pressure to avoid actually using anything. Like, you could end the fight with a 3rd level spell, or you could slowly end it without spending any resources. It takes longer to play but is otherwise mechanically superior. Deeply anti-fun for me.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I would call the fight with Everae Altana in FFX one of the exceptions, but a couple Phoenix Downs aren't exactly rare.

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't change me. I always like to save something good, gives me comfort knowing i have something up my sleeve i can use if i need to.

But if im dying? Probs use it all at once or give it to someone who isnt dying (unless im all alone)

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago

This is such a lovely answer, thanks.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Have you ever arrived at the final boss and notice you still have every single consumable you've ever picked up in your inventory? And then you still try to defeat the boss without using any? Yeah...

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I do that not because I don't wanna waste something when it might come in more handy; I do that because 90% of the items are simply junk and don't help even when I use them and simply forget to sell them because I rarely go to shops since they never sell anything useful anyway. 🤷‍♂️

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Yes, I would consume my friends immediately

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Imma cannon ball into a lava pit.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This makes me think you’re empathetic enough to not be able to think of a world without other humans. I like that. It’s a good place to be.

It was actually a metaphor for post modern avantgarde multipartner relationships with ai robots.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 1 points 15 hours ago

Save it for later if it's unopened, but use it up if the seal has been broken.

I aim for largom but sometimes weak, haha

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

One of my biggest problems in life is trying to do things / use things up all at once. Probably an aspect of ADHD.

This is definitely the case with media:

  • getting too into a game has, multiple times, caused me to put university on the shelf for a bit.
  • occasionally get periods of time where I feel the need to grind stardewvalley valley and play no other game. It's also one of those games where I compulsively start new saves before completely finishing the last one
  • when I find a really good series to watch I just watch an episode every day. Sometimes that becomes my main recreation. MadMen was the best example of this because I watched it with zero break days (except a family holiday?) from start to finish
  • When Daredevil: Born Again came out, the release time for each episode was like 4AM in Britain and I'd been planning around it releasing at midnight or evening like they usually do. For some reason I HAD to see it before I did anything else. 4 AM wake-up on a wednesday for about 5 weeks. Damaged my sleep schedule significantly and left me not enough energy to even go to university on those days.

If a book doesn't make me want to read it all now, it won't get read at all. Because it's competing with flashy phone screen for my attention.

Not sure how friendship gets "consumed all at once" but I think I'm actually a "save hings for later" in that regard, same wth romantic relationships. Just can't plan ahead with dopamine-wells such as entertainment and snacks. I can save non-snack food for later, and I actually excel at it.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 2 points 19 hours ago

I'm a "if I set this down I'll never see it again" person. A "start with the minimum I think I'll use and get more as necessary or I'll become an accidental hoarder" person.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

USE IT ALL NOW, RIGHT NOW! IF I DON'T USE IT NOW IT WILL BE FORGOTTEN.

Yeah in like a llife or death situation I'd be more pragmatic but as it stands I can't just let things sit.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I just wonder if it’s fine to leave something for those who come after you, though …

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago

Thankfully the resources I consume are rarely needed by others in my local vicinity

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I hate how my brain will sit there and say “that’s good, you played enough of this game, you’ve read enough of this book, save the rest for later, next time,” when I’m literally doing sweet fuck-all afterward, no plans, nothing to do except continue the thing I was doing, but no. Brain wants me to stop.

There’s your answer.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Depends on my mood, but the important thing is that I am comfortable doing things in whatever order I feel like.

At a buffet I may eat desserts first, last or in the middle. If I have a limited amount of something I do consciously decide whether to eat them all at once or save some for later. Sometimes I make the wrong choice and that is ok.