181
He may or may not have the votes, but he certainly doesn't have the evidence. However, that no longer seems relevant for Republicans.
They believe in the rule of law, just like they believe in Jesus. More of a mascot than a coach.
They see impeachment count as a political issue ever since Trump was rightfully impeached twice. Now they can't be the only party with a president impeached so many times.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Another pandering to the base waste of time and taxpayer money.
Yet they keep getting elected.
The problem with morons is they enjoy being pandered to. When a large portion of the voting electorate possesses less critical thinking skills than the average elementary school child, you can see how pandering to what they perceive to be their "in-group" is THE MOST effective strategy. Until education, gerrymandering, and the problems with the electoral college are addressed in this country we will always be in a perpetual position of potential minority rule by the stupid, lowest common denominator of the voting public.
I really believe you should at least have to take a pop quiz on your party's current platform before you're allowed to vote.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
My tax dollars being used for an investigation that has turned up ZERO evidence in the 3 years it's been active is MUCH MORE IMPORTANT then my tax dollars being used to fund teachers doctors first responders roads infrastructure lead pipes . . .
load more comments
(4 replies)
Why govern when we can do performance art! Yeah!
I see they still dont have a single accusation for Joe. Hunter is not an elected official.
But what about ummm.... Hunter's dick?
Hunter's hog is a matter of congressional record.
Every day we see another mass shooting in the US, and this is what these idiots are working on.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Good to see Republicans are working on the important things this country really need first...
“Elise and I both served on the impeachment defense team of Donald Trump twice, when the Democrats used it for brazen partisan political purposes. We decried that use of it. This is very different,” Johnson said.
Oh ffs.
To be fair, it is very different. Trump committed some actual crimes. Serious crimes.
Republicans looked the other way, and for good measure plugged their ears while screaming nonsense like a bunch of toddlers who didn't want to hear that it was time for bed.
All the votes and none of the evidence
"claimed the inquiry wouldn’t be used as a partisan political tool"
lol.. not 'used as' one.. it is one.
How has the White House been stonewalling anything? They've been staying out of it entirely, as has the DOJ seemingly. It's just that y'all conservatives have been failing at proving anything whatsoever about Hunter and have just been making yourselves look like idiots.
Because voting genuinely matters.
They tried to make it not matter but it really really matters. Dems need the voters
load more comments
(1 replies)
Johnson - 
Does he have any actual evidence?
They have tons of evidence:
- Hunter Biden is the son of the current President.
- The current President isn't a Republican.
See? Tons!
It's all on Hunter Biden's laptop.
"We have hearsay and conjecture, those are kinds of evidence"
Mike ‘lying for the lord’ Johnson
Not this stupid shit again...
Anything they can do to diminish the integrity of the word is in their game plan.
load more comments
(3 replies)
They’re insufferable
He also believes in god… so…. His credibility isn’t great.
A formal impeachment inquiry vote on the floor will allow us to take it to the next necessary step, and I think it’s something we have to do at this juncture.”
While comforting that the republicans feel another fishing expedition would yield result, this is was what was promised last time.
That there would be undeniable proof Biden was corrupt.
And it yielded nothing. They had full access to his bank records/ taxes and couldn't find anything?!
Either I have to assume that Sleepy Biden can hide his secrets better then the whole republican party, or I have to assume that the republican party isn't competent enough to find the evidence.
Something something the enemy is both strong and weak
I thought they've had an impeachment inquiry underway for over a month now, or is that the Senate?
The Senate does not have the power to impeach, and it's controlled by Democrats, so it wouldn't be there. There was something in the works under McCarthy, but can't remember how far it went.
They admitted it was made up as a distraction if I remember correctly.
" Bacon added. “But high crimes and misdemeanors? I don’t think we’ve seen that or enough data to really make a good case and I feel like [Johnson] really agreed with us on that.”
They are just going to keep saying shit because it gives the republican voters something to be angry about and keep the rift.
I've said it before and now again, I will not vote for Hunter Biden for president. The Regressicans need something to do to maybe help someone in this country instead of smiting heathens.
Yet another Benghazi sequel, to establish false equivalency in the minds of low-information voters.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Poor guy lost one of his own yesterday and now he desperately needs some payback pandering.
This is so annoying. Like what are you gonna do it for? Biden being old? Having grey hair?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Won't happen.
Has the votes, too bad he doesn't have the high crimes and misdemeanors.
Same dude who voted against expelling Santos and fucked up his own intended funding delays. His track record is pristine so far.
He might have the votes, but is completely out of evidence...
🙄
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
181 points (94.1% liked)
politics
19104 readers
1775 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS