this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
28 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14348 readers
88 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-19 SFA 1x07 "Ko’Zeine"
02-26 SFA 1x08 "The Life of the Stars"
03-05 SFA 1x09 "300th Night"
03-12 SFA 1x10 "Rubincon"
TBA SNW 4x01 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here’s a TrekMovie exclusive that lives up to the hype.

Strange New Worlds co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers has revealed/confirmed that the show’s bridge and other sets at CBS Stages in Mississauga have remained intact pending decisions by the new Paramount owners on the Year One continuation into the 1701’s first missions under Captain James T. Kirk.

“That makes this the big decision for them, because, it’s about, do you hold on to the sets, currently? As I said, they have not been destroyed, so we’re waiting to find out what they want to do.”

So, while Paul Wesley has already committed to season three of AppleTV’s historical romance offering The Buccaneers, it seems that a continuation of the Enterprise’s early years is still a live possibility.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When I was younger and TNG was coming out, I thought "oh wow this is so cool, every 20 years we go another 100 years into the future of Star Trek!" And here we are almost 40 years later, still rehashing the same characters from the same eras over and over. The only breath of fresh air is the last bit of Discovery and Starfleet Academy. Give me a flagship show set in the 26th century or a show about the Temporal Cold War. Something new!

I recall that feeling!

I also recall that there were many TOS fans my age for whom the Kirk-Spock-McCoy triumvirate defined Star Trek.

I never thought that way myself but it’s been a dividing line in the franchise from the start.

I love SNW for what it is but I have to say that I was disappointed that Akiva Goldsman — who said he was himself disappointed when he joined Discovery’s writers room in season one to find out that they originally had no intention to include Pike — turned out to be more focused in telling the pre-TOS backstory of the TOS main characters than in telling the story of the Enterprise under Pike’s command.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was surprised how much I liked Paul Wesley's portrayal of Kirk. Wouldn't be upset by this.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Same. I really liked him.

[–] MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This was an problem that Picard showrunner Terry Matalas ran into when he pitched his Star Trek: Legacy spinoff series set on board the USS-Enterprise-G (formerly USS Titan), as all of those sets were destroyed immediately after Picard season 3 wrapped up, adding significant startup costs to recreate everything for a new show.

Ah so that’s why that sets are relevant. No sets no spinoff.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, so that’s why…

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Picard was produced in California, seemingly a condition of Patrick Stewart.

Paramount was able to get a one-time California state grant to defray costs but it was produced on leased soundstages rather than Paramount’s own.

This meant that there was a very short window after production ended before the sets had to be broken down. Some of the set elements and properties were packed and shipped (perhaps to Toronto?) It seems that the Enterprise D bridge reconstruction was transferred to the Roddenberry archive.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's some serious clout to swing around, but I hope it wasn't medically advised. 🥲

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It seems that CBS senior executives really wanted a show with Patrick Stewart as Picard.

Many attempts to pitch a show were made but it wasn’t until Chabon flattered him into reading a concept that Stewart would even meet with the creators.

CBS and other studios had access to the state grants to incent the major streamers to keep production in California and made the choice to blow theirs on Picard.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Ok, phew. 😅

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I had this idea over a year ago.
Let SNW transition into a new TOS. I'd like to see it. I'm happy that they're considering it.

The SNW co-showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers have been chatting up this idea for almost a year it seems.

The announcement that Thomas Jane was cast as McCoy, and appears in the SNW series finale at the end of season five, suggests that, unlike Matalas’ Legacy concept, there was some series buy-in at senior levels prior to the merger.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh for fuck’s sake. Can we end the prequel train already?

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Strange New Worlds is great. Prequels can drag a franchise down if they're low-effort cashgrabs but SNW is the most consistently good Star Trek has ever been.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I do enjoy Strange New Worlds. It’s almost what I want out of NuTrek, I just wish it was a new crew on a new ship. Keep the cast, I like them, but I don’t like that NuTrek is 82% based on nostalgia

[–] kbsez@mstdn.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

@caseyweederman @Mongostein

Indeed.

Strange New Worlds has been some of the best Trek we've had in 35 years.

I'll also put S2 of Prodigy in there as well. It is patiently criminal that show got canceled.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Agreed. I want more Prodigy! And more Lower Decks. Starfleet Academy is pretty good so far too.

[–] billmason@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago

Personally I'm happy if there are no more pre-TOS series. And I really am "meh" about Paul Wesley's Kirk so I don't need a series with him in the lead.

I mean if they make it, I'll check it out. But I'll be perfectly fine if they just don't.