this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
152 points (98.1% liked)

3DPrinting

21957 readers
17 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vorpal@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

Another tip, to save some plastic on prototypes: if you have a paper printer you can make a technical drawing in your CAD program, set scale to 1:1, print it out and compare (make sure to measure to check that the printed size is actually 1:1). If need be use scissors to cut out the profile.

This won't take plastic shrinking into account, but in my experience it can remove the first few iterations at least. And it is way faster, and paper is less bad for the environment.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There should be a law that if any part is discontinued the 3D CAD files should be in a public database.

[–] tehfishman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Why stop there? All design files and code in the public domain and accessible in a public database.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

I think this is exactly why several states are trying to pass laws to basically kill the 3d printer market... It's never about safety, it's about right to repair.

[–] discomatic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Well I could listen to this guy talk all day.

Is there a program somewhere between TinkerCAD and Fusion?

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Damn this was the best video on the subject. I could find zero faults with his method.

I love how he did the thin slice method to check all the numbers. I love how he wrote all over the prototypes. I love how he called out specific checkpoints to revalidate.

Perfect tutorial. 10/10. No notes.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Zach Freedman always has quite thouroughly thought out videos. Not always interesting for me personally, but quite a few bangers.

And he launched Gridfinity into the ecosystem it is today.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Zach is a national treasure.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Agreed. One may be able to use a scanner to avoid pains making quality pictures.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

I love this dude so much

[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really liked the video and the way he explained the process. Loved the tip about using translucent/white PLA in the first few test prints and making marks with permanent markers.

[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Apparently the legality stuff is iffy according to YT comments and the tips in the video should not be construed as legal advice.

[–] Koprov@piefed.social 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nobody's going to know what you're printing at home unless you're using one of those spyware filled, cloud connected printers.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

You mean the most popular brand of all aka Bambu? I can‘t recommend them even if they don‘t snitch at you right away. The ecosystem they‘re setting up is bad for consumers as is.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Firstly, never take legal advice from youtube or even here. And it's very unlikely you would ever be caught doing it as long as you don't sell the parts. Nor should you ever reverse engineer life threat level parts. Because you ain't that smart or good. And if you are that smart, you know better than to do so.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

One thing I think he missed, in my experience, is many of the critical dimensions may be in the user manual as a drawing. For example, the hole spacing for mounting the drives is standard so either the mount or the drive manufacturer might have called out the position and size. This would be way better than measuring, especially if they are using metric and you dimension in inches.

Great vid though.

The few 3d models I've posted, if they require extra hardware I almost always post the mcmaster link. Not because they are the best hardware supplier, the cheapest, or they pay me.

No, because all their hardware has dimensional drawings for it. So the person looking at it can find their own that matches the spec.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you are reverse engineering something like those used sleds, it's unlikely you are going to have any kind of paper to give you those critical dimensions. As he said, those sleds were bought second hand. You ain't ever going to get any kind of manual with them.

As far as measuring goes, It's all G20/G21. I'm pretty sure the overwhelming vast majority of 3D printing people own a 6"/150mm digital caliper. Metric or US Customary numbers are available at a mere push of a button. And you should also own a 6"/150mm stainless steel scale. Evem Mitutoyo are less than $20. Though I prefer Shinwa brand myself because I find them easier to read with my old feeble eyes. Buy one or several. But to be honest, just about everything in the US these days is metric. We just don't brag about it.

Those are the 2 basic tools you need at your desk when you are reverse engineering a part or design something the new the world has never seen. Add a pencil and a sketch pad and you are set.

The sleds might not have a dimensional drawing, but the drives that go in them with all their screw holes would. There might even be an existing 3d model of a drive that they could have used to check interference of their design against in fusion.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Or find a 3d model of a drive and see how that matches up before you print anything.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Damn, that's a really good point.

In this specific situation, looking up the specs for hard drive screw mounts means you can skip a lot of the manual measurements.

You can certainly still measure to double check specific placements, but the spaces between the holes, and the height above the deck should be standard.

Heck, just knowing the measurements of the hole spacing and the internal dimensions of the hard drive space can be used to double check all your other measurements and have more points of reference.