501
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by tun@lemm.ee to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world

Nobara OS, Arch Linux and Pop!_OS beat Windows 11 by a slim margin in fps (delta 8) in Windows native games - Cyberpunk 2077, Forspoken, Starfield and The Talos Principle II. Windows 11 wins in Rachet & Clank.

ComputerBase's testing was done on an all-AMD test rig, featuring a Ryzen 7 5800X (non-3D) and a Radeon RX 6700 XT.

Update: Windows 11 wins in one game.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Carol2852@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 7 months ago

Soooo when did Arch become a gaming focused OS?

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 95 points 7 months ago
[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago

Pretty much this.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 73 points 7 months ago

Is arch really gaming focused though?

[-] lea@feddit.de 37 points 7 months ago

Arch is focused on being cutting-edge and lightweight which happens to be perfect for gaming performance in most cases but that's all.

[-] p5f20w18k@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Arch is focused on however you put it together

[-] oo1@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago

Arch is focused like the same way a beach is a camera lens.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Exactly. The only thing Arch focuses on is not focusing on anything. They ship packages as vanilla as possible, have pretty much no default configuration, etc. In short, they try to make as few assumptions as possible.

It ends up being pretty good for gaming because Linux is pretty good for gaming. They're explicitly not doing anything special here.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 20 points 7 months ago

SteamOS is based on Arch, likely why they picked it.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

That's like saying PlayStation 5 and Switch are based on FreeBSD, so you should game on FreeBSD (well, not quite, but hopefully the point is clear). FreeBSD isn't good for gaming, it's just liberally licensed and easy to build on top of, hence why it's used.

Valve has reasons to use an Arch base, and none of them have anything to do with any specific benefit regarding gaming. It's easy to fork and maintain customized build files for since it makes so few assumptions (packages are as vanilla as possible in Arch, so it's easier to maintain a patch set).

Valve likely has patches in SteamOS that haven't made it to upstream Arch, and there's likely a number of packages that are quite outdated vs upstream Arch, so installing upstream Arch will give you quite a different experience vs SteamOS.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 months ago

shrug, I've been using arch and Manjaro for years and gaming in them. They are what you make them, and AUR is massive and solves a lot of problems I have in other distros so that's why I use it.

[-] pe1uca@lemmy.pe1uca.dev 38 points 7 months ago

I recently switched to ubuntu in a gaming laptop, right now I've been using it just for jellyfin and some other coding tasks, but it definitely runs smoother, more stable, quicker, and cooler than windows did for the same workload.
I was surprised at the difference of even just having the machine idle, on windows it was noticeable warm, now on ubuntu it's almost as if it has been turned off.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Honestly, at this point -- If Valve made a more generalized Linux OS... or even at the very least started making honest proposals at unifying how the OS ran, so that their efforts in getting gaming to work on it could be more widely productive; we could see a radical shift in adoption.

Now now, I'm not saying YEAR OF LINUX ON THE DESKTOP!! - but Valve would be a great mother for fostering an ecosystem that would potentially make Microsoft compete by not making their OS shittier year-by-year.

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 7 months ago

If Valve made a Linux OS... or even at the very least started making honest proposals at unifying how the OS ran, so that their efforts in getting gaming to work on it could be more widely productive; we could see a radical shift in adoption.

Sorry, does SteamOS 3 not count? Is Valve's massive investment in Mesa, Wine, Wayland (HDR, Gamescope, etc) not exactly what you're talking about? I feel like we're living in parallel dimensions or something lol

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

Steam deck was definitely a move in this direction. From what I hear people like it. If they like it, I see more traction to it as people understand that it's not windows. Ya never know. 2035: year of the Linux desktop!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 28 points 7 months ago

Assuming this is the usual case where most games are within noise of each other, the ones that don't run under linux are excluded, and nobody acknowledges that the need to precache/predownload shaders provides short term benefits.

Its like people miss the good old days of "This is the year of linux gaming. Everything works and is perfect. Okay, those games don't work. But every game I care about works. Except the ones that don't". Like, we really are in a golden age of gaming parity but pretending there isn't still work to be done serves no benefit.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Yup. Just use the same benchmarks major sites use and note any interesting differences. They usually pick games for specific technical reasons, so most of the work figuring out where Linux is weak is done for you.

I personally play on Linux because I use Linux, but because I think it has better performance than Windows or whatever. That should be the selling point, not slight differences in performance. Show that Linux is largely on par with Windows, and then go through all of the other benefits to using Linux, like privacy, package management, and user choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 27 points 7 months ago

Computerbase is very solid and well known in Germany and have been covering Linux quite a bit for a while now.
Performance of course can fluctuate heavily between games but the amount of progress that Linux made over the past decade is nothing but astonishing.

[-] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago

that's kind of my take on it too. Linux has come so far from what it used to be like. it's not quite ready to see mass-adoption, but it's making some amazing strides. so many different parties have been contributing to a massive effort to iron out some of the issues with Linux. once performance improves significantly over Windows, and compatibility gets a little more wide-spread, you'll start to see people willing to put up with the teething problems, in the name of superior performance.

THAT is when Linux will see more mainstream success.

some year, i don't know when, really will be the year of Linux.... maybe.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 23 points 7 months ago

Description is false. Windows won in R&C. This was not an across the board win for Linux. Good news doesn't need to be sensationalized.

[-] tun@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

Updated the summary about Windows winning.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

These tech YouTubers should do Linux comparisons. These are not small differences when comparing, let's say, Nvidia 4060 and the RX 7600. It could make the AMD GPU edge out the more expensive Nvidia offering

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Ok, but what about Nvidia GPUs? Those are what the the vast majority of gamers use.

[-] limitedduck@awful.systems 12 points 7 months ago

Nvidia has been kind of a mess for me on Wayland, especially the lastest 545 drivers. I just switched to AMD and literally all my issues disappeared, including one I thought was a KDE plasma bug

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cycloprolene@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

93A1A71EABD6B6CD658458CC1F4

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] icdl@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

I've been using arch and manjaro for the past 3 years with awesomewm and gnome (can't get awesomewm to behave with second monitor while gaming so I switch to gnome when using the second monitor, using laptop) and this has pretty much been my experience. Windows is bloated and it never"just works".

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Windows almost always just works.

This seems crazy to say when talking about Linux. Especially when saying you have to switch to use dual monitors.

[-] Neomega@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

I have to agree. I love Linux but Windows really does just work. Especially when it comes to gaming. I applaud anyone that enjoys Linux gaming but don't act like it's anywhere near as simple as on windows.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Yeah. In all the time I’ve been using windows I never had a problem that people constantly report; even BSOD happened quite rarely. I never got my pc to randomly shut down and update either…

Like, I switched to Linux cause i saw it as cool, wanted to try it out and liked how customisable it was and mostly to spite the megacorp

[-] TwanHE@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Honestly since windows 10 the only blue screens I've gotten are due to my own doing.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago

Nearly always something random breaks for me on windows, and it's a huge pain to fix it. I hate dealing with windows, Linux is easier, because it isn't a black box.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A stupid amount of non tech users manage to use it absolutely fine, so I'm not sure what you're doing wrong tbh.

Linux is 100% not easier and not advertised as such.

[-] Shareni@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A stupid amount of non tech users manage to use it

Meanwhile, most of those users are running systems that are so deteriorated that it takes them a minute+ to open a browser.

On a machine that they only use to browse internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LoremIpsumGenerator@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I'm not familiar with the games mentioned in the article, but Linux is great for gaming. I run Manjaro on my T540p laptop and have never had problems with Angband or Nethack. I can even run DF with tilesets if I'm feeling spunky. Mind you, I do have 8 gbs of RAM and a pretty sweet Intel integrated graphics setup, so that may be why it's so smooth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 7 points 7 months ago

Hasn’t this been happening for years?

Intel’s clear Linux had similar articles published about it years ago.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
501 points (96.5% liked)

Linux Gaming

14248 readers
97 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS