this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28838 readers
1868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/33746

The extremes to which the Republican Party will go to sway the 2026 elections in their favor was highlighted again on Sunday after US President Donald Trump said he will sign no other legislation into law this year until the SAVE Act—a bill that would deeply erode voting rights and threatens ballot access for tens of millions of Americans—is passed by Congress.

"It must be done immediately," Trump declared in a characteristically unhinged social media post on Sunday, referring to the SAVE Act, versions of which have passed the Republican-controlled House but so far stalled in the Senate.

"It supersedes everything else. MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE," Trump continued in an all-caps tantrum. "I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION - GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY - ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL: NO MEN IN WOMEN’S SPORTS: NO TRANSGENDER MUTILIZATION FOR CHILDREN! DO NOT FAIL!!!"

Voting rights experts and Democratic lawmakers have denounced the SAVE Act as a dangerous threat to millions of eligible voters, calling it a clear effort by the GOP to tip the scales in their favor by depressing voter turnout in 2026 and beyond.

"In every form, the SAVE Act would require American citizens to show documents like a passport or birth certificate to register to vote. Our research shows that more than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents," warned Eliza Sweren-Becker and Owen Bacskai of the Brennan Center for Justice, which advocates for robust voting rights, in a blog post last week.

"Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport," Sweren-Becker and Bacskai continued. "Millions lack access to a paper copy of their birth certificate. The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but younger voters and voters of color would suffer disproportionately. Likewise, millions of women whose married names aren’t on their birth certificates or passports would face extra steps just to make their voices heard."

In response to Trump's threat on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) characterized the SAVE Act as "Jim Crow 2.0" as he condemned the president and his GOP allies.

"If Trump is saying he won’t sign any bills until the SAVE Act is passed, then so be it: there will be total gridlock in the Senate," said Schumer. "Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances."

Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, said Sunday that the SAVE Act—which Trump said last week must be passed "at the expense of everything else"—is not a voter ID bill, but rather "voter suppression" legislation bill masquerading as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

"If it was a voter ID bill, it would provide people with the proper IDs to vote, with no barriers — but it doesn’t," noted D'Arrigo. "The voter fraud rate is .0001%, and this bill would potentially prevent up to 69 million women, 40 million who don’t have access to their birth certificate, and 140 million without a passport, from voting."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Not that legality matters, but how is the Save (Donvict) Act even legal? Aren't elections up to the states to run?

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago

If you take away the ballot then you leave us only the bullet to vote with.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I could think of a few Dems who will sign it. Just give it enough time. Schumer will probably join them too eventually.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 22 hours ago

Schumer may "hold out" himself after he has quietly arranged for enough other Democrats to cave. He has done that before. He thinks he's being very cunning and people can't see right through him.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 17 points 23 hours ago

As if anyone takes schumer seriously about not passing anything until such and such happens, man has never won a game of chicken in his leadership, everyone knows he will cave, that's why he was chosen by the donors to lead this controlled opposition shit show.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If Trump had ever taken a civics class, he'd probably have learned that if a bill sits on his desk for 10 days while congress is in session, it will pass without his signature.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You don't even need the civics class, just watch that one schoolhouse rock video.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Or The West Wing. :)

Tomayto, tomahto

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

He’ll just use an illegal executive order to stop it once he realizes, and no court or congress will do anything.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Given Schumer's record, Dems will cave in about 2 weeks. Sigh. Kiss your voting rights goodbye, US married women, and so many others.

[–] sandwich@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

This is my biggest concern. I sincerely doubt they’ll hold out.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website -1 points 1 day ago

Meh, in the end US voting rights have mm ratings...

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I swear to god if anyone breaks party lines on this...

This feels like a profoundly make or break moment for compete fascist control of the government

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure fetterman already said he was for it. Not sure if you still count that party lines or not at this point.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Is for the SAVE act? Thats pretty fucking damning, seeing as how its blatant voter supression

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

TLDR: Toddler in chief is threatening to not sign any new laws.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

I assume not doing something under any circumstances means doing it as soon as his donors think it's helped clear the news cycle of something they don't want in it