257
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] radix@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

some leading members of GOP leadership voicing concerns about setting a precedent of ousting a lawmaker who had not been convicted of a crime.

The thing about ethics rules is that they are more expansive than legal rules. If you are just going to defer to the legal system, why have any ethical rules at all?

There are all sorts of things that are awful, but still legal. If a Representative marched down 5th Avenue in a literal swastika-and-iron-cross nazi parade, I would hope they would be expelled, despite being a legal (though reprehensible) exercise in free speech.

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

The same GOP tried to impeach Biden based on conspiracy theories they made up themselves

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

And because that's how they did it, they find it perfectly normal and natural to say that ANY action against trump whatsoever must be based on made up lies.

[-] Goronmon@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Can't believe this actually happened.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Wow, this guy must have pissed off too many of his fellow GOP House members. I would have expected them to close ranks and support him, at minimum until he was actually convicted. But, this speaks to him being pretty unpopular within his own party.

[-] the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just before the vote was about to begin, Rep. Max Miller of Ohio, one of Santos' Republican colleagues, sent an email to the full Republican conference, writing that he and his mother were victims of credit card fraud tied to Santos' campaign and that he would be voting to remove Santos.

"Neither my Mother nor I approved these charges or were aware of them," Miller wrote in the email obtained by NPR. "We have spent tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees in the resulting follow up."

It's literally because it was starting to affect them personally.

https://www.npr.org/2023/12/01/1215899764/george-santos-expulsion-house

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

Because he's embarrassing them. It's the one thing most people are unable to tolerate.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Because he’s embarrassing them.

I mean... Have you seen the remaining members?

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They don't want the focused gaze to slip off him and see them.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

114 voted no, so bipartisanish

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I don’t think bipartisan ever meant “every single Republican and Democrat agreed.” A handful of Dems voted no too

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Trump is going to tap him as his running mate.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

With half the indictments of Trump it’s obvious he’s weak sauce. If he had 94 indictments maybe he’d be the Republican nominee for president.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
257 points (98.5% liked)

News

23301 readers
1034 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS