this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
145 points (98.0% liked)

News

36375 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Tuesday, Texas held its Democratic and Republican primaries ahead of the upcoming November midterms. Democratic voters chose between Jasmine Crockett, the anti-Trump firebrand congresswoman, and James Talarico, the populist state representative, in an election that attracted national attention. Crockett conceded the race and endorsed Talarico on Wednesday, but only after claiming late on election night that she wasn’t ready to concede because of a voting issue in Dallas.

“We don’t have any of the results because there was a lot of confusion today,” Crockett told supporters at her election-night party. “We were able to keep the polls open, but I can tell you now that people have been disenfranchised.” Crockett received 45.6% of the vote, compared with Talarico’s 53.1%.

Voters in Dallas and Williamson counties faced challenges due to a change in voting location. Voting rights advocates say that the difficulties in voting amount to voter suppression – and they raise concerns about how smoothly the November midterms will go. (The Republican candidates, Texas attorney general Ken Paxton and the incumbent senator John Cornyn, will face off in a runoff on 26 May.)

Denisse Molina, who worked as a poll monitor with the Texas Civil Rights Project in Williamson county, said that she saw several voters go into one precinct only to be routed elsewhere. In one large voting site, Democratic and Republican voters were unsure where they were supposed to go because of a lack of adequate signage.

At another site, a leasing office at an apartment complex, Molina said there were only three voting machines available despite people from 13 precincts being routed to that location. About 200 people waited in line for hours – so long that voters began to leave.

“I had never experienced voter suppression like that,” Molina said. The difficulties Molina witnessed were not isolated. Across Dallas and Williamson counties, voters described classic suppression tactics: long lines, extended wait times and confusion about voting location.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Krasnov endorses Paxton no question

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Democrats were in charge of democratic polling locations in Dallas and Williamson County this year. Normally the polling locations in the primaries for republicans and Dems are the same by agreement between the two parties, and that usually includes county-wide voting during early voting periods.

But this year the republicans in just these two counties wanted hand counted ballots and did not want the locations to be the same. They wanted precinct-specific voting on Election Day, not county-wide. The moment this decision was made in January, it was the Dems responsibility to get the word out where and how to vote. They knew this was coming months before the election, and they dropped the ball.

Considering that Democratic PACs like “Lone Star Rising PAC” were running anti-Crockett ads in Texas — you should be asking yourself if this lack of organization by dem leadership in these two Crockett strongholds was done on purpose.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/georgetown/election/2026/01/29/what-you-need-to-know-about-williamson-county-election-day-voting-changes/

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Prolly shouldn't bother asking yourself if it was on purpose. Cause you already know the answer.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 7 points 22 hours ago

But if you know the answer, are you not also logically the best person to ask?

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

On top of this, it's not like voting locations are set in stone forever. Moving a polling place shouldn't immediately equate to voter disenfranchisement. Regardless of why or how that change happened, innocent or practical or nefarious, educate voters if you're already talking about a candidate you want them to vote for. The county/state isn't responsible for going door-to-door to tell people about a change like that, and even if they sent out a mailer, that's easily ignored.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

In Canada our polling stations are pretty set in stone. On occasion, due to community activities, they are changed but everyone also receives a voting card with the polling station clearly noted.

We also have a federal arms-length agency - Elections Canada - that takes care of all facets of a federal election, including boundary lines. Same with provincial elections. No politicians or political parties are allowed to be involved in any part of electoral rules, regulations or changing of boundaries.

I've always been amazed at America's electoral free-for-all that seems to encourage voter suppression.

Unfortunately, the way things are run electorally in the states is seen as a feature instead of a bug for most politicians here, and has been for pretty much the entire existence of the country.