this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
373 points (95.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

30213 readers
915 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

me like use nano. nano say how do thing. nano exit easy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 3 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

nano is usually built in. Adding another one is just redundant if all you're using it for is editing an occasional config file.

Honestly never understood the hate for it. Who cares? Petty, stupid, nerd-wars over little crap like a text editor is the reason average people don't even consider linux.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

I very rarely see people hate nano (except a few comments in this thread), and I always see nano recommended as the text editor when people give advice on doing things in the command line

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 59 minutes ago
Emacs evil mode enters the chat
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I first ran into nano when I gave Gentoo a try. I had to edit a few config files, so I ran vi... no vi. Emacs? No Emacs. Well, shit, what am I supposed to do? So I went back a bit and read more carefully, apparently there was a thing called nano.
So I ran that. Ew. It was a clone of an old DOS editor of all things. What kind of lunatic had ported that? Anyway I managed to do my edits with it, added normal editors to the system and was on my way.
It was also the last time I used it.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

nano is the perfect editor for people who only use editors in the terminal, once in a while to edit a config file.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't think it's the perfect editor for anything. They'll have to use vi sooner or later, they might as well learn the basics. Or just use kate.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 minutes ago

Use Kate in command line over ssh?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"I hated using it"
"But you have used it, yes?"

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yes. But I did wash my hands afterwards.

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 26 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I actually prefer micro

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I can use Vim, it was the choice for years. But I actually like using nano because it's what I need and all I need.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I no understand nano. I hate key combinations

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fortunately, every computer comes equipped with an "exit editor" button. It's on the back, attached to the power supply unit. You just flick the switch. Exits every editor known to humanity. /j

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Ah, the famous NCIS way of exiting editors.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I love nano. I used to do tech support for a Linux-based content management system (before SAaS take took off).. The customer sysadmins were sometimes whichever engineer was volun-told to do it, so competency varied wildly.

I helped mostly with installs. This might be the poor newbie sysadmin's first time on the command line. Nano was my go-to suggestion for editing config files--all the commands are right there! Much less intimidating than vi or emacs for a newbie.

Nano you can pick up in ten minutes and master in an afternoon. By that time you’re still reading the intro to vim or eMacs.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 81 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Vim users: "I feel bad for you"

Nano users: "I don't think about you at all"

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 102 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The image is misleading. The brain sizes represent the amount of grey matter it takes to operate the editor. The nano guy has plenty of brain power left over for things like hygiene, breathing and basic reasoning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I used some distro with vim back in the day and I just kept using it. I lose my shit when I use something with just nano and my muscle memory tries to do a vim thing.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 1 points 6 hours ago

If I can't :wq I have a panic attack

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago

Same. Makes nano a fucking nightmare.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I use micro. It's 1000x better.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Nano with a few config options by default?

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Pico...I'm going the wrong direction

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Today I learned about the existence of "milli" and "kilo", both of which are terminal-based text editors! Quite interesting. I wonder if there are any more SI unit prefix text editors...

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Holding out for a cursed deca

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Some real talk.

Can we just include the 4 most popular text editors on basic systems??

Like i wanna scream when there isnt my text editor installed on a lightweight distro.

Vi Emacs Micro Nano

For context,

Debian ships with nano and vi Openwrt only ships with nano

Like cant we just include small editors. In a perfect world i would want neovim installed. But i understand its larger and has alot more dependency's.

So having VI isnt as good but im willing to be reasonable.

JUST INCLUDE VI

the reason i learned vim is because VI is installed by default on almost every distro.

Im tempted to try emacs tho

EMacs is an operating system masquerading as an editor.

For OpenWRT Nano is a good choice. Nobody spends hours in a text editor on that system. You can ssh into it and use any fancy editor with a million plugins installed on your own computer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 22 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

nano is just a text editor, I use it as a text editor, it has keybindings on screen by default, no need to config or memorise, why bother? (for text editing, not whatever people use vim or emacs for)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›