this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
197 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
3912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Users of Meta's AI smart glasses in Europe may be unknowingly sharing intimate video and sensitive financial information with moderators outside of the bloc, according to a report from Sweden's Svenska Dagbladet released last week. Employees in Kenya doing AI "annotation" told the journalists that they've seen people nude, using the toilet and engaging in sexual activity, along with credit card numbers and other sensitive information.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Why um, why do "smart" glasses have moderators? πŸ€” Am I too far 'offline' to be asking? 😬

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Am I too far 'offline' to be asking?

This is surveillance phobic... and I'm down for it

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It may be time to train some llms to be anti llms... πŸ€”

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

AI training. They have the tag the videos for model consumption.

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Egads! AI - the new asbestos. They're putting it in everything! B🀦

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago

Reading this headline all I can think is "Are y'all really surprised?"

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 53 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

lol what kind of weird nerd is wearing smart glasses while having sex lmao

imagine you're over at some dudes house, about to get dicked down, and he comes out with nothing but these big fat blinking glasses on

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I assume it's people making (hopefully consensual) POV videos.

[–] skrlet13@feddit.cl 3 points 8 hours ago

Yea, it sounds more confortable than wearing just a camera tied to yourself. POV porn is popular afaik

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I know why they’re doing it. I just think it’s something only a doofus would do.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

Agreed πŸ‘

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Or someone making OF content for example.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Believe it or not but not all sex starts with walking into the bahtroom, closing the door, disrobing, and hopping under the covers.

[–] TALL421@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you have blankets in your bathroom

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No it's the "Baht Room". Like you've been Baht. You need to be punished. *wtsh *wtsh

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

Exactly. This obviously wasn't a brain fart + typo.

The kink shaming of some people.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

omg can I just make fun of techbros wearing Facebook smart glasses without everyone doing an 18-point analysis on it?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I feel your pain. Welcome to Lemmy.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I hate making out wearing glasses. That said, it is a porn category πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Glasses are like lingerie: They’re not for during, but before

Really? I think it's way more natural than wearing a go pro.

Bedroom is a very reasonable realm for smart glasses if they aren't connected to the internet and are used for local recording.

The really weird part is wearing them in public and either recording people without their consent or even giving the clear impression of recording people without their consent. Wearing smart glasses in a public place is just an asshole move.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Any camera/audio device with a wireless connection in your home is recording and storing your intimate moments.

[–] recked_wralph@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

I know that bandwidth isn’t hardly the finite resource that it used to be, but I still can’t get over how amazingly wasteful it is to continuously stream live video halfway around the world just so you can… ask your glasses to describe what’s in front of you?

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

I mean... If you can't trust underpaid workers in Kenya's sense of privacy, who can you trust?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Dicking down Riley Reid. Meta style.

Or being dicked down by Johnny Sins.

The glasses have potential. But anything with Zuck I don't trust. (I have to be inclusive here)

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'll say it. It Zucks.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

All Johnny Sins needs is a GoPro and a suction cup.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

I've already seen plenty of POV porn where the guy has two free hands, so I'm sure it's a gopro and head strap. Which I'm sure looks ridiculously goofy for anyone else in the room.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Nice to know that when you're standing at the urinal, some schmuck at Meta has seen your hog.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

I would let them do this for $40

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think I could get off if my partner was wearing these hideous things.

Or anyone else in the room for that matter.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

I always make sure to tell my audience to remove any smart glasses. It's just creepy doing it in front of them otherwise.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Finally, a way to indulge in exhibitionism without having to leave the house!

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago