this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
142 points (98.6% liked)

World News

54525 readers
2275 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The UK has agreed to a US request to use British military bases for "defensive" strikes on Iranian missile sites, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

But the prime minister said the UK had learned lessons from the "mistakes of Iraq", and was not involved in the initial strikes on Iran and "will not join offensive action now".

Sir Keir said the basis of the decision to accept the US request was the "collective self-defence" of allies and protecting British lives, accusing Iran of pursuing a "scorched-earth strategy".

The BBC understands the US is likely to use RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean for strikes on Iranian missile sites.

In his video statement on Sunday, Sir Keir said the US would use UK bases for the "specific and limited defensive purpose" of destroying Iran's missiles "at source".

He added that the move was in accordance with international law, and the UK government had published what it said was a summary of its legal advice.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akh@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago (3 children)

UK showing why it had no spine to stay in EU

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 18 points 5 days ago

Germany allowed logistics for this war, so UK is not the only one.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Okay let's be honest here, no major actor in the EU has anything resembling spine; they all go weak in the knees when Uncle Sam calls.

[–] urandom@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Spain appears to have a spine

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah but it's not really a major EU actor AFAIK. They're important to the EU but don't really shape its policies in the same way, say, France or Germany do. This is probably due to aforementioned spine, but either way if I'm not mistaken Spanish priorities aren't very relevant to EU foreign policy. I actually added "major" specifically to exclude Spain, though it is debatable whether that was accurate or not.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

Because Andrew was merely the crown jewel of Mossad's UK blackmail operations? We all understand that's Israel's control lever here right? Rich people on tape raping and killing kids.

[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Spineless Starmer and his Tory Lite cohorts...

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

The poodle tradition is still strong

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 23 points 6 days ago

Here is how you stop Iran targeting you. You tell the US to fuck off and leave.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

On brand for the UK.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Can someone find any way the US attack can be defined as "defensive"? Seriously, even as devil's advocate, I fail to see any. "Preemptive" is already questionable, but defensive is flat out lying

[–] sudo@programming.dev 16 points 6 days ago

Stitch your lips to our assholes because you are now in our murder suicide pact with Israel.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 days ago
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago

Seems pretty consistent for a Government that unwaveringly supports Genocide as long as the aggressors are of the "right" ethnicity and the victims are not.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 14 points 6 days ago

In other news, Iran today struck an RAF base in Cyprus

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/reports-of-possible-iranian-drone-impact-at-british-air-base/

Is this when the kids say FAFO?

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 7 points 5 days ago

yay. let's all lick dumpy's boots!

[–] vane@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

How many hours it took them to dump his phone memory and find some compromising materials ? 6 or more ?

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

slaves doing slavery