this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
103 points (96.4% liked)

Canada

11677 readers
488 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The truth is that homes deliver enormous non‑financial value — stability, community, belonging. Those are reasons to buy. But as financial assets, they come with structural constraints: They are expensive to maintain, difficult to trade, impossible to diversify, and usually purchased with significant leverage. The investment component is real but volatile, and its return path can be long and uneven. For home buyers now facing losses, this is not an individualized failure. It is the predictable outcome of society promoting an undiversified, illiquid, highly leveraged asset as if it were the ultimate life goal.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-the-myth-of-homeownership-as-an-investment-is-wreaking-untold-damage/

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheDoctorDonna@piefed.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's almost as if homes shouldn't be a commodity.

Homes aren’t a commodity, they’re a depreciating asset. Land is what has real value in our society, and this is a cultural development dating back to Enclosure in the Middle Ages. We realized back then that if you don’t own your own land then you are effectively a slave paying rent to someone else for the privilege of having a roof over your head.

I’ve seen other solutions proposed around here, such as government ownership of housing where we all pay rent to the government. What I don’t get is how people can say that with a guy like Trump in power. Do you want Trump to be your landlord? That sounds horrible!

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Value is not living with in-laws. Priceless.

[–] kablez@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Cries upside down (Australian)

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pass a law that corporations or businesses cannot own family dwellings and BOOM!...rent decreases and purchase opportunities throughout the land.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I haven't seen stats showing businesses own a large amount of single family dwellings or apartments in Canada. Individuals seem to own a lot of condos for investment (with businesses owning a bit less).

Do you have stats showing corporations owning a significant portion of Canadian real estate?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I will never understand why Canadians think their shit doesn't stink.

Is it the cold? It's the cold, isn't it?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

I just deal in gut feelings and hunches. Sorry, no numbers for you.

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago

This article is 4 years old chances are it's in full swing by now.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Like, then don't buy it as an asset, buy it as home? Its not like people can just wait for some 20 years without home for crash to happen, and crash would likely be tied to some event where everyone loses their jobs or banks fall of whatever.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Reminds of the people worrying about their car "losing its value". It's a car. It's a utility. I will use it until it falls apart. That's It's value.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

The run up on housing prices forces most Canadians to put too much cash into rent or home ownership. I think the piece is more pointing out there's a problem. The fix has to come from policy makers, not individual buyers.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Which is why I like the Japanese home loses value over time approach.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Japan had the same problem as Canada before they rezoned housing federally for density, wiping out hundreds of miles of single family homes to build highrises.

If you see a aerial view of Toronto there really is no city, relative to most metropolis in the world. The problem is entirely government created.

https://www.stockaerialphotos.com/media/08759b93-8ae3-4841-bbd1-cd2886594e0a-toronto-skyline-2016

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

Wonder if high speed commuter trains could solve chunk of this issue without destroying homes just to put up high rises elites will keep empty like in NYC.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

OMG three pieces from the Globe about Canada's fucked up housing policy and how it's screwing us.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they are done boosting it, you know the housing crash/long winter is incoming.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I'm pretty sure the Globe has had thick pieces about the housing crisis since the run up before COVID. And they've been calling out our shit productivity for decades.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago

Right... And rent prices are stable? Jesus fuck. At least try to draw a comparison.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

You need shelter. You can pay money and have nothing at the end, or you can put it into equity. Owning a home is the best investment you'll make in your life. The maintenance costs are trivial. Beg, borrow or steal whatever you need to afford the shittiest little thing you can afford and upgrade later.

House prices going down in Toronto are not a reason to ignore the value of home ownership. They're an opportunity to get yourself out of rentals. This author is on drugs.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You need shelter. You can pay money and have nothing at the end, or you can put it into equity.

I generally agree, a home should not be primarily thought of as an investment.

It's a roof over your head that you have more control over than if you were living in a rental.

And after a period of time, you actually own it and no longer have to keep paying someone else for the privilege of having a place to live.

[–] farting_gorilla@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Minor nitpick, most places (US-specific) have property taxes you have to pay every year, so even if you own your own home, you're paying something to someone every year for the right to have a roof over your head.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're also (indirectly) paying those same taxes if you are renting, so it's not really a deciding factor in favour of either housing option.

[–] farting_gorilla@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not arguing either way with that, just pointing out that our current system (in most of the US at least) demands that you pay someone to live no matter how you do it

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Well, yeah, but the amount you're paying goes down dramatically after some time if you're buyer compared to renting.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Owning a home is the best investment you’ll make in your life.

Sure grandpa, let’s take you to bed

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like your grandpa didn't pass on his brains to you.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

He did me one better. His hard work paid for some financial literacy so I’m grateful

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

90+% of people in China own their own homes, and a lot of that is apartments. Not treating housing as a financial instrument doesn't mean "everyone rents"

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

We need shelter, but our governments have stopped ensuring it's attainable.

Tax policy encourages people to treat their home as an investment by exempting it from capital gains. Other tax policy has made the construction of rental units less attractive to developers. Our federal, provincial, and municipal governments stopped building affordable and low income housing. (There's also the zoning/NIMBY crap, but that's been discussed to death)

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

The Federal government is currently buying half of all mortgage bonds to inflate prices with cheap debt and printed money, as new housing minister who ruined Vancouvers housing market Gregor Robinson says housing is an investment.

Don't elect liberals if you don't want the poor to be destroyed by a regressive home prices.