this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
153 points (99.4% liked)

News

36160 readers
2980 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

American sympathies in the Middle East have shifted dramatically toward the Palestinians, according to new Gallup polling, after decades of overwhelming support for the Israelis.

That shift accelerated during the war in Gaza. Three years ago, 54% of Americans sympathized more with the Israelis, compared to 31% for the Palestinians.

Now, their support is about evenly balanced, with 41% saying their sympathies lie more with the Palestinians, and only 36% saying the same about the Israelis.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 10 hours ago

Ghislaine Maxwell is effective Queen of Israel and by extension the US and UK. That should shift opinions.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Isrealis got a little bit with the initial attack but it did not take long to be like wow. this is worse than us. that being said what I want is to have nothing to do with the region and that includes the saudis.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Honestly I'd like to back a country and people a bit further north. That being the Armenia and the Kurds, upside is we can also piss off the Turks while being in the moral right.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

My perception going back decades was that Israel was beset on all sides by people who wanted to destroy it, and it was a big shit show, and they did problematic stuff but that's what they had to do to stay alive because other nations wouldn't even acknowledge their right to exist.

That is very much not my perception any more. There is no sort of hand waving away their culpability in intentional genocide. They know better than anyone the kind of evil they are inflicting, and they continue to do so.

I don't in any way condone Hamas or their tactics, but I get it. They were being slow-genocided for decades and they strike back with the very limited means that are available to them. Asymmetrical warfare is fucking ugly. It's ugly to do, it's ugly to fight against. But I get they needed to upset the status quo. I think in that they succeeded by showing the world exactly who Israel is. I hope the future is kinder to the Palestinian people than the past has been.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

That is my own experience as well. It took a while, but my eyes started to open in similar ways. Thank you for taking the time and putting words to it; you're braver than I am to do so.

The only thing I would add is that Trump has gone out of his way to inflame differences, like in his first term when he moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem knowing it would reignite what had long been settled by truce: something like 50 people died the day it opened. And that wasn't the only thing; I'm just going off the top of my head. It's been thousands of small and large insults, aggressions, injustices directed at the Palestinians all along. And now look at what it's become. I can't even begin to imagine the pain of the Palestinian people.

For me anymore, it's not even just about Israel. It's about the utter corruption of both Bibi and Trump, and for me personally, a suspicion I can't kick that they and a few others literally planned this genocide together so as to make a couple miles of highly-desirable waterfront property available for development. Last I heard, even Tony Blair was helping them plan it out.

So it makes sense now, to me anyway, why pro-Palestine protests and protesters have been met with such intense, personal, over-the-top hostility and even legislative action in both the UK and the US: it's because they were pointing directly at the large scale murder-theft of their people and land openly taking place before all our eyes and interrupting the age-old move along, nothing to see here charade put on by corrupt leaders only playacting at peace.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Israel was beset on all sides by people who wanted to destroy it, and it was a big shit show, and they did problematic stuff but that's what they had to do to stay alive because other nations wouldn't even acknowledge their right to exist.

This basically describes hamas in Gaza now.

There's a lot of parallels between Israel during the six day war and hamas during Oct 7. Both were surrounded by hostile country/s who would not recognize their right to exist and had an army ready to attack on their borders and were blockading them, though Israel was only being blockaded on one port. Then they launch a surprise attack on their neighbors. The difference is Israel succeeded and Hamas didn't.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

It’s been an imperialist settler colonialist project since day one the religious aspect was just convenient to roll into the racialized supremisist ideology that justifies annexation of land and genocide of the indigenous that drives the imperial colonization machine

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

No lies detected.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m very much in the same boat. Much of the discussion I’ve had on the topic in the past has centered around how they were thrust into a weird and fucked up geopolitical situation as a direct fallout of the Holocaust and one of the final gasps of overt British colonialism… but these days, it’s WAY harder to use those facts as an excuse anymore (as in: the behavior of the Israeli government has gone so far beyond pragmatic defensive measures that could be reasonably appropriate to that context, to the point that it now looks and feels deeply hypocritical with regards to how things started for Israel in the first place).

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Israel never had pragmatic defense. It always used the security concern BS to continue settler colonialism

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

You should read about the zionists leaders and how they always wanted the whole land in long term and Herzl advocating for ethenic cleansing

[–] core@leminal.space 11 points 1 day ago

Yes, growing up the narrative was very much Israel is a heroic underdog valiantly fighting to exist while everyone else in the Middle East tries to destroy them with everything they have. And the US has to help them b/c Holocaust, Christianity, strategic military value, hand wave reasons.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

Great post, speaks for a lot of us.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Add to that that with Syria, the last external threat to Israel is gone. It's like Israeli politicians and the military still think Israel is the David threatened by a Goliath, when they have become the Goliath and their actions against civilians now look what a superior force does to a helpless victim.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

They were Goliath from day one, notice how they won every single war in short order, none were even close, because they've superior technology, the most advanced weaponry in the world, without even paying for most of it.

You say still david, they never were, and only a sheep would have thought so.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's why they're picking fights with Iran. You wouldn't do that if you were actually scared

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

David is an apt comparison actually, celebrated for genociding the Amakelites but made out to be the underdog by history written by the victors.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you condemn the IDF for carrying out the Hannibal Directive and killing all those Israelis on October 7th?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think they effectively already answered this. What point are you trying to make?

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com -4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They said the opposite. They said they understood why the German Nazis exterminated Jews for burning the Reichstag building.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I have never in my life uttered a single positive or empathetic word about Nazis. If you're trying to put words in my mouth through some twisted false-equivalence, miss me with that shit.

Any goodwill or empathy I feel toward my fellow humans, Nazis are always the exception. It's a free world, do what you want — unless you're a fucking Nazi then you should die mad, and preferably screaming. Violence is never the solution — unless the problem in Nazis.

If this is a case of mistaken identity, fair enough shit happens. If not, then in all sincerity, fuck yourself with glass until you bleed out.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I probably should've included the word "basically" in my comment, though I do stand by what I said. You understand what Hamas is said to do on Oct 7th, and I compared it to the Holocaust because the Jews burned down their Reichstag building. Jews didn't burn down the Reichstag building, the same way that Hamas didn't kill all those Israelis on Oct 7th. The IDF carried out the Hannibal Directive, and killed their own people using Apache helicopters and tanks, and used that as reasoning the comitt a genocide against a semite population, much the same way the Germans did to the Jews during the Holocaust.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well then, I stand by option B above.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com -2 points 16 hours ago

That's fine. I don't expect to convince genocide apologists.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

What the fuck is wrong with 36% of people?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Those without empathy and their abused victims.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

That’s the 36% that still support Trump. I don’t know if they’re actually able to wake up. I kinda doubt it

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

36% is too high after a goddamn genocide. Zero sympathy to israelis till occupation end

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

No more zios no more liberals.

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Because people who are not happy with the slaughtering of arabs/muslims (even those racists who hate arabs) are the same who have empathy and logic that human suffering is bad and those who inflict it are evil, no matter the race or religion.