this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
100 points (93.9% liked)

Videos

17890 readers
538 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

TLDW; some troll is suing YT-DLP using DMCA 1201 to make ripping tools illegal. If that shit holds in court, it can set a dangerous precedent. OBS Studio can get taken down because it lets you record your screen as it shows copyrighted material, so it could count as "ripping software".

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

I'll start suing people for watching content because their eyes and brains are copying the content to memory.

this is fucking insane.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I’ll stop recording data you send me, when you stop recording data you take from me

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

unfortunately the suit isn't against the people doing the recording. it's against the people writing the software that enables you to record.

that said, I wonder if it'd be possible to then sue meta or google for illegally recording your "content", aka data, based on 1201.

[–] indomara@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wtf. People have been recording tv and media to watch later since the days of the VCR ...

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is why this will fail even if it passes.

It is never impossible to record a screen.

[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 23 points 1 day ago

"You wouldn't download a screen recording"

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have to update my yt-dl constantly. A clone won’t do shit because YouTube will update.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 20 hours ago

Someone around the world would pick up the mantle, there are thousands of ctontributors. The point is that the code isn't lost in the blink of an eye.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seems like a bit of a jump? Why would this impact screen recorders and stuff like OBS? Those tools can be used for plenty of use cases outside of the one mentioned.

[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

If we treat “ripping” content the same as breaking a digital lock under DMCA-1201 we could see restrictions with screen recording software or worse. Certainly yt-dlp would be the first to go.

It’s not guaranteed though, and the title is quite clickbaity. The lawsuit mentioned merely sets a bad precedent.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How would this kill screen recorder though?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

your screen displays any DMCA protected content, which the copy protection software is circumvented by recording your screen.

the funny thing is, it's not just software like OBS. this could have implications of something as simple as a phone camera.

could you imagine suing Samsung because they allowed their phone camera to record protected content?

I know I can, because it's going to happen if this troll sets the precedent.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone have a TL;DW or related article?

[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Content creators can download videos and criticize them, which is well and good, but you can't just steal the content. You need to be actively pointing flaws or pros, or it isn't fair use. If this particular lawsuit is won, it'll set a precedent that enables taking someones channel down simply because the video was downloaded or captured. It would circumvent fair use.

Here's a snippet that gives the TLDR.