this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
837 points (99.6% liked)

196

5774 readers
1538 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] confused_polarbear@slrpnk.net 3 points 19 hours ago

I am a billionaire… I have 1 billion microplastics in my body

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago

Their parents created so much value for humanity that it overflows to their children.

(capitalist ideologues really believe this)

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I don't know if forcefem will help but I guess it'll at least be good for diversity

[–] morto@piefed.social 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be much different even for billionaires under 90

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Yeah, as far as I'm aware, 100% of them came from at least a middle class family. They start with a fair advantage over the poor still. Most are born to extreme wealth though.

[–] tackleberry@thelemmy.club 22 points 1 day ago

The system we created ensured the wealth is concentrated among a few of us, has always been this way even when monarchs ruled a majority of our population.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Outlaw billionaires, tax them out of existence, and use the proceeds to fund needed social programs like medical care for all and universal basic income.

They can still be richer than 99% of us as multimillionaires, and the more wealth these elites create, the better our society becomes through the tax sequestration - it’s a win win.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd prefer abolition of the system entirely that makes this possible. If we just tax the rich, they will be able to reinstate the system however long it takes.

Make it as unattractive for them as possible to even consider working against society's wellbeing. That must mean social ownership of the entire economy, in the hands of all through mutual aid, give-it-forward, communes, and trade unions.

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

What's the difference between millionaire and a billionaire? About a billion dollars.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They can still be richer than 99% of us as multimillionaires

Miss me with that weak socdem sauce 🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s an olive branch, but yeah I hear you.

I hear you too but I'm just tired of giving these people more olive branches for them to strangle us with 😮‍💨

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 10 points 1 day ago

Plus, we already know it works.

We just need to tweak it to take into account the ways the rich cheat the system.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It still weird me out that there are only something like 600 billionaires in the US. This seems like such a solvable problem.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We could easily solve that with just a single guillotine.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago

Or, hear me out:

Woodchipper.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At 5 minutes per execution, it could be done in just over 2 days. If you wanted to ensure that nobody missed any of the event and limited it to 8 hours per day, you could get it done in 1 week.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You could do it even faster, just assemble 6 guillotines. Then you could execute 72 per hour instead of 12. You'd then be done in 8 hours and 20 minutes.

Special holiday!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dude, you are living in the past. Band saw and conveyor belt.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Hold on. Who'd build and own the band saw and conveyor belt?

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago

You got any plans this weekend?

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm no dude, but yes, that sounds absolutely revolutionary. Industrial oligarch eliminationmaxxing!

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago

...now that's industrial thinking!..

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

if we did one per minute, we are looking at about 10 hours of solid thwacks. give or take. im sure we could shave that down by a few seconds per, they are a physically weak people on average. so i imagine we could get it done in half the time if we shave it to 30 seconds per billionaire. and have them all lined up. ready to go.

thats an afternoon. about 5 hours at 30 seconds a pop.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

I appreciate the Silcon Valley-esque efficiency calculation but honestly that's not a super high requirement. 5 hours, 10 hours, a week, whatever. No need to speed run this thing. Honestly if we were good in a year I'd be thrilled.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hunger games, billionaire edition, the winner gets a quick death.

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Imagine if they dropped all their loot upon death, i would love to see the lootsplosion of money, gems, deeds to property, stock folios and legendary/epic rarity artworks & artifacts.

Unfortunately very small EXP rewards as they never levelled up through the grind.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You had to do research for that?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's a counter-example that proves the rule:

  • Born in 1992
  • Graduated from MIT in 2014 at 22
  • Joins a proprietary trading firm after graduation
  • Founds a quantitative trading firm in 2017 at age 25
  • Founds a cryptocurrency exchange in 2019 at 27
  • On the 2021 Forbes "30 under 30" list at 29, and is recognized as a billionaire
  • Found guilty of wire fraud and conspiracy in 2023
  • Currently in prison

Sam Bankman-Fried got to $1b before 30, and he didn't inherit his wealth (but he certainly started with a lot more wealth than most people). But, the way he managed to hit $1b before 30 was via massive fraud. Without massive fraud, I don't know how you go from an entry level job at 22 to $1b just 8 years later.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm fine with taxing the ever-loving shit out of their estates. If the heir class are not fine with that, we can go to OP's suggestion.

History would seem to suggest they are not fine with being taxed as a general concept

in other news, grass is green

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

The percentage of sociopaths involved with creating a society should never be greater than zero.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder what the suggestion may be.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it involves cutting edge technology.

[–] WillStealYourUsername@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably a headless sever as well!

edit: whoops, *server

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's against most rules for advocating against certain things, however for educational purposes only I would suggest a slow roast with a barbeque glaze, and if you'd like to put in some effort an apple and sage stuffing could really help bring some flavours out (be sure to remove that giant stick they all have up their arse first, though).

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

That stick is for the rotisserie!

Remember BBQ derives from French

"barbe à cul" = "beard to butt"

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I have a suggestion, we should make billionaires pay……their fair share of taxes.

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

It’s not just this, we need to end all means of them living off borrowed debt. If you own that much money, there is no reason to be borrowing anything from anyone you have more money than

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›