this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
291 points (99.7% liked)

News

36043 readers
2756 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Bureau of Labor Statistics found that U.S. employers added 181,000 jobs last year, far fewer than the 1.46 million jobs that were added in 2024.

The U.S. economy experienced almost zero job growth in 2025, according to revised federal data. On a more encouraging note: Hiring has picked up in 2026.

Preliminary data had indicated that the U.S. economy added 584,000 jobs last year. But the Bureau of Labor Statistics revised that number after it received additional state data and found that the labor market had added 181,000 jobs in all of 2025.

This is far fewer than the 1.46 million jobs that were added in 2024.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

They're all working for ice, govt socialism redistributing our tax dollars.

[–] TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

A ton of corporate jobs are being offshored to places like Thailand and India. All these corporate bastards want to do it make as much money off the backs of others and don't care who it fucks over.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Uh huh, hey, why don't these job numbers reports ever talk about whether these new jobs are keeping up with the cost of living? Seems like it'd be important to discern how many jobs are paying minimum wage and how many are paying enough to actually afford to survive longer than the next 24 fucking hours. Oh, and how many of these new jobs are union jobs that protect worker's rights? Pretty fucking important bits of information to just never ever report...

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago

That's a very good point.

An "Income From Work" report would show far better how most people are being impacted.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

A quick proxy could be overall wage increases for the year. I'm sure average wages for new jobs may be findable somewhere, but BLS recently released this:

Compensation costs for civilian workers increased 3.4 percent, not seasonally adjusted, for the 12- month period ending in December 2025. Wages and salaries increased 3.3 percent and benefit costs increased 3.4 percent over the year.

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/eci.pdf

From BLS report USDL-26-0184 on Feb 10, 2026.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks. And fair enough, I'm just feeling sore about the state of things lately I guess. Wages and workers rights could always be way better in the US imo, so whenever these jobs reports come out, I get cynical. Sometimes unnecessarily so.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Cynicism is warranted. If you also look at inflation/CPI, it held pretty firmly at 2.7% for the year. That puts a 3.3-3.4% increase in salaries and benefits in a bit more perspective. I'm not even sure that 2.7% figure is very realistic. The way they measure CPI is pretty outdated. There are a lot of services we consider necessary now that aren't covered, and those things have been going up a lot in recent years. Just as an example, my cell carrier bill went up 14% last year. I'm looking at other options, but it's just one example of a service provider that either increased prices or watered down their product to try and squeeze more profit out of us in recent years.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

but DIDN'T THE DOW BREAK 50,000 DOLLARS

[–] dejova281@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, in my bank account.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 60 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Those tariffs are really juicing the US economy straight the moon.

Since most companies give crap raises I regularly browse available jobs and can say that both quantity and quality of available jobs is way down compared to 2024.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

💎🙌🚀🌕

Hodl for the sweet sweet trickle down boys and girls. Just a bit longer…

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

The trickle down IS happening right now. Do you not like your golden shower?

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 13 hours ago

It took me 8 months of looking to finally get interviewed. Luckily, they hired me, otherwise I would probably still be applying.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I was told that Biden had the worstest economy in history and that Donvict was here to fix everything!

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago

When, uhhh, when WAS the US economy good for most? Has to be pre-pandemic at minimum.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I hate to tell you, hell, I hate that I even have to say it at all, but you were lied to.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

Even my $5k DOGE check? It’s not in the mail?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As someone looking for a different job, it shows.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago

I wish you the best of luck finding something that works well for you. You got this.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Didn't the orange moron fire the guy who gave mediocre job numbers last time.

Let's revise those numbers for reality.

-1,810,000 jobs

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Yes. She would have not been directly involved in the production, amd she was fairly new to the position anyway in the grand scope of the methodology and procedures behind this type of report (she was about a year and a half in), and statistical agencies and the civil servants who work there take methodology VERY seriously (I know, I've worked with these kinds of agencies) and they'd have a LOT of reviews and checks in place for something this high profile to ensure it's as accurate as it can be.

If anything it was more a slap in the face of the non-political government workers who geek out on statistical methodology and just want to produce the most accurate stats they can.

Have no knowledge of this website, but here's an article about her firing:

https://www.epi.org/policywatch/firing-bls-commissioner-erika-mcentarfer/

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

We're at such a weird time, low job growth, but productivity is still increasing due to technological automation. We need a new New Deal.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 9 hours ago

Its fine guys.

All the young smart people have left.

Also we have these special "wellness camps" now for poor people, mental health addicts, and young women at risk of pregnancy.

By reducing the number of people competing for jobs, there will be more jobs to go round.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago

But the Dow is over 50,000 doll.. I don't know why you're laughing at me...