Oh, look, dealing with a bully by negotiating with him hasn't worked.
What! A! Surprise!
Nowadays I'm fully convinced that the politicians in the EU Commission are either profoundly incompetent, rotten as fuck, or both.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Oh, look, dealing with a bully by negotiating with him hasn't worked.
What! A! Surprise!
Nowadays I'm fully convinced that the politicians in the EU Commission are either profoundly incompetent, rotten as fuck, or both.
Bet the EU felt satisfaction using the same words Trump and his cronies were using when they were trying to change the deal last year. I certainly would.
Let's see how long that satisfaction lasts once they notice that Trump doesn't fucking care. Magats don't have principles, why should they care what they said yesterday?
The EU's position here seems entirely reasonable; they made certain concessions to the US in return for certain concessions in kind.
While the tariff rate they're facing now is the same as what they agreed to, it's also now the tariff rate that the US is applying globally. That means the EU is no longer receiving any special consideration, so why should they give any?
A sustained selloff of US bonds by EU + UK, Norway and Switzerland would get their attention
But would this be asking rich people to sacrifice their wealth for a greater good.
Not really. How would it? Buy new shit, fuck the bond. Do gold instead, or something…
Already happening. Gold is USA's top export product at the moment. And it does seems to be USA bond for gold.
I mentioned this the day he did the press conference to announce the 10% worldwide tariffs.
The tariffs were originally sold under the guise of managing fentanyl trafficking by forcing new trade agreements to be crafted piecemeal with various nations instead of the large multinational agreements of yesteryear.
They were sold on Trump being such an incredible dealmaker and his constant refrain that countries were coming to him and begging him to make deals.
He literally blew up every deal that was in the works not because anyone else in the world did anything wrong, but because he is mad at his own Supreme Court rightfully telling him to pound sand. He is punishing every idiot who took a chance to work with him, not because they didn't follow through on their agreements but because he is the biggest baby bitch on the fucking planet who cannot handle being told "no" whether it's a whole country, a court, or a thirteen year old girl.
Master dealmaker my fucking ass. Any country that was in the process of making a deal with him already had a lot of evidence he would blow up his own deals at his convenience, but this should be the final nail in the coffin of anyone even trying to work with the US and expecting the US to be acting in good faith.
Yep. This is it. The real consequence. What little credibility they had left, they lost it.
crediwhatity?
There is one critical mistake in the EU position. Their argument requires honour. The US has none.
*Trump has none.
No. If a Trump can arise once, it can arise again. This lands on the USA, not Trump. They have proven that their system lacks the ability to hold to an honourable agreement.
funny, people been saying the same thing about Hitler since the 1950s.
I'm starting the think it's not a system problem and is a human problem. if true that would mean that "a Trump" could exist anywhere, not just in the US.
It took Germany 50 years to rebuild trust.
Sure "a tRump" could exist anywhere. Except not just any country has the military firepower and global power that America has (or had).
So a tRump existing in Moldova or Colombia is far less likely to have the ability to affect world affairs than the current American incarnation can.
Trump, his administration, the supreme "court", congress, the house of representatives, the GOP, their donors, their voters, their sellouts...
Don't forget the people who do nothing but 'slam' the other side on social media and then tear their clothes as victims online.