this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
75 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54043 readers
2363 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah well peace doesn't make itself you know.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 58 minutes ago

Peace can't exist without war, don't you know? ... wait a second ...

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Are there a lot of fishermen out there for Hegseth to soften his murder boner on?

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Kind of off topic, but I've seen the the Ford carrier in Virginia before and it is HUGE. It's crazy how big this ship is. It's like the Empire State Building tilted sideways. When you see it irl, it really puts in perspective just how powerful one ship can get.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 23 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

Do we really need to bomb Iran again?

Can’t we just… not?

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 2 points 54 minutes ago

If we want to see this stop, we need a revolution. We need to build a worker-led anti-imperialist movement.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

trump can’t reply as he’s deep throating netanyahu

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Surely Netanyahu has kompromat on him too right?

[–] RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Epstein was working for Israel. They've got it all.

[–] Sundiata@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

while getting banged from behind by putin.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Nah Putin is watching from the cuck chair

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 6 hours ago

We're still looking for the WMDs.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Hey, what you don't trust me?

[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There used to be a satirical musical group called the Capitol Steps that sang a song called "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Iran" sung to the tune of the Beach Boys Barbara Ann. This was at 20 years ago. Unfortunately, Covid killed the group (as in made it no longer viable because people quit coming to see them, not actually killing them).

I wish they'd try to make a comeback.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 6 hours ago

yeah US Senator John McCain of Arizona himself loved to sing that little ditty

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/s8hEtI9AI0U

I'd love to see the end of the Ayatollahs myself.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 10 points 6 hours ago

Many people do, but there are legitimate concerns about

  1. if an invasion could even actually achieve this,
  2. the humanitarian cost of it (aka A LOT of innocent people dying or losing everything),
  3. the long term effects of destabilizing a whole region and
  4. the damage to the rules based global order caused by yet another war of aggression from a side that is supposed to support and not undermine that order.
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Theoretically... what would happen if Iran or someone else happens to magically sink this thing, fighter jets and all?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

More pollution in the Mediterranean :(

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Without reading an article, but I will assume you mean a magical macguffin weapon just.....sinks it and no one knows what happened. The response depends on a few things.

Without its strike groupThreat assessment will show its defenses were overwelmed by the macguffin weapon. Maybe even conventional missiles - these things aren't invincible.

With Strike GroupThe normal Carrier travels with 12-15 destroyers and other auxiliary vessels to provide screening and defense overlapping. If the carrier is struck and damaged/sunk in the center or back of this strike group, without loss of other vessels, an immediate retreat and Threat assessment will be done to see how the macguffin weapon got past everything else. This would be the concern - again Carriers aren't invincible, but how your macguffin got past so much radar would be important and the MAIN focus, if the macguffin did not do it in an immediately obvious way.

Strike Group disabled/sunkIf the entire strike group is damaged/sunk, the entire fleet will pull back to begin assessing risk of the macguffin. Damaging a fair number of ships run by the United States in a short order should be beyond poor nations capabilities, so the macguffiin weapon would necessitate reevaluation. Delay of at least a week to assess where/what the macguffin weapon is, (Assuming its a singular object) and then if the target, say Iran, is able to be struck within a specific loss ratio of troops.

A macguffin weapon like a Deathstar type where it can fire at single target position would give most Threat analysis away and the immediate questions to answer would be 1. How much energy/fuel/ammunition does it cost to fire. (If a broke country can afford a mega laser - how don't I have one?) 2. How does it target (radar can be blocked, is it manually aimed as direct fire/ parabolic like artillery) 3. How can it be avoided (like blocking radar to aim, or like can a physical obstruction block the firing angle. 4. Can it be destroyed (is it susceptible to a strike team on land to sabotage?) 5 Is there more than one.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

If it looks like something that could happen again, rather than a one-off fluke, USA would have to change their whole naval doctrine. The strategic arms balance of all countries would need to be reassessed.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t want to see people die, but the US needs to suffer a wound like this.

[–] pastaq@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because that worked out so well the last time...

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

The last time they needed desperately to bring the public support for a war around bcs the ppl were very much against a war (with financial/imperial goals).

Ohhh ... yeah, I see, poor ship.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Monkey paw finger curls

Hiroshima, August 6th, 1945

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Could be used as another USS Liberty, though I'd assume they would go for a cheaper carrier, and it looks like Israel is getting all the support from USA it needs.

[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It will probably trip and fall then jump saying it's OK. Gerald Ford actually like Dana Carvey's portrayal of him.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Oh. You're right. Dana did Bush the first. Wouldn't be prudent.