this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
394 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1145 readers
789 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 1 points 7 hours ago

No more borders ! No more nation states !

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I am so sick of the open borders boogeyman I have turned into a radical open borders maniac. I will become the stupid strawman that they have erected!

Open the borders in all of America now motherfuckers. Stop restricting the flow of people. It is a human rights violation to fuckup their countries and then force the people to stay there. Literally the only way to solve this is with open fucking borders.

Anything less than this is an admission that we are the oppressors for all of America.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i'm not saying open borders.

i'm saying no borders.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The entire earth belongs to everyone. It's madness to close one section of it off and say that nobody else can ever go there without your permission.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

and no states.

and no police or prison.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought these are supposed to be wrong??

As a rule of thumb any meme format will always be used to convey the opposite message

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not wrong, more like simple minded. Open borders is a bad idea on things like security. If you think people are all nice and good and wouldn't abuse open borders, I don't know what to tell you.

You need a process for immigration that is helpful but ooen borders is dumb as fuck.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

looks at EU thats a lot of countries that allow citizens moving freely through them. Strange how it works so well.

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be clear the issue isn't only the people coming not being integrated correctly but also the abuse of migrants fleeing desperate situations by people within the hosting country.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The exploitarion largely stems those migrants not being 'citizens' so do not execrise the same rights. And they cant speak up without threat of deportation. It only drives the point borders enforce exploitation.

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be convenient for your point but at this juncture I'd recommend you look it up if you really care because I have no willingness to carry on with this discussion.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not the one to make the original claim. So instead asking me to back up mine, you back up yours first. Should be easy right?

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Immigration and Customs Enforcement" doesn't really sound like border enforcement is part of their remit, more sounds like they should be making sure people DO immigrate to the US, or more realistically ensuring people follow the correct processes to immigrate.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Their predecessor, Immigration and Naturalization Services, was split up after 9/11 with the creation of Homeland Security. ICE was established as the immigration law enforcement division, and Customs and Border Patrol as another, somehow worse enforcement division. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the department that actually handles legal immigration.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Sadly, not how it's going. Especially with dead and / or arrested citizens.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

It's dumb to think you can close 12,000 miles of borders, and even dumber to pretend freedom of movement isn't a right everyone, not just the wealth class, has.

[–] amikulo@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It really felt like flipping a switch similar to when I left Catholicism. Once I started questioning borders, I very quickly got to the point of being utterly baffled that people buy into the idea of borders at all.

yeah, the cult i left was similarly all-encompassing. you look at the world and say "why the fuck are we drawing lines"

[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

I think it's only a question of WHEN the population decline in the developed world affects economies enough that countries offer immigrants incentives and actively recruit people to move there.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

I don't advocate open borders as a final solution, but it would probably be better than what the federal government is doing today. And it would be better than letting ICE continue.

[–] SystemL@literature.cafe 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Legitimately asking here,

Would this mean you'd like anyone to come into America without going through a process? Like just allowing the people to walk in and out?

Or is it you want to reform the border?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Would this mean you’d like anyone to come into America without going through a process? Like just allowing the people to walk in and out?

Yes.

What are you so afraid of?

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You ever been to Europe? Lots of borders you can cross without even realizing it. It's anti-human to allow goods and services to traverse borders but not people.

[–] deeferg@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Counterpoint, Europe has its own borders and you can't cross those if you're not from inside of the EU. And even that is a specific subset of EU countries.

Akin to inter-provincial/across state line travel. I think a lot of people outside of Europe just view it the same as a provincial setup.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

They've got agreements between these various countries. No reason we can't expand that list of countries.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But not from outside the EU. Europe in total is still smaller than the US.

If yoz want an accurate comparison, you have to imagine the EU as one country and the members as states, or the US as a union and the US states as countries.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those are all still separate countries though. I don't see how their size relative to the US is relevant. The countries have agreements amongst themselves that include an open border policy. There is no 'natural' reason why such agreements can't be expanded, or implemented elsewhere.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not disagreeing with you there. Just that the argument of comparison to the US is lacking.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Why does size matter? What exactly changes? If every country joined the EU. What then?

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Within the EU sure, because they're "softer" boarders because of the way it's structured. Closer to crossing state lines in the US. They don't allow free movement with non-EU nations.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It sounds like you're saying "of course you can have open borders if you have open borders". No kidding.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

More "of course you can have open borders if you can pick and choose which borders"

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

They don't allow free movement with non-EU nations.

The cool thing is, we have a recent of example of an EU nation going from open borders to closed borders. Remember Brexit? Remember how much of a disaster that was and continues to be?

[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I am sorry, but I struggle to see the real harm in abolishing borders.

And please don't say crime. Americans, that have lived there before do just as many of them as immigrants (normalized for income) and pretending otherwise would be delusional and racist.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Crime mainly flows out of the US not into it. US citizens are some of the worst reactionary criminal hate filled losers on the planet. If we needed borders it would be to keep Americans out of other countries for their safety.