this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
120 points (98.4% liked)

News

35867 readers
3463 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This doesnt stop until there are no more billionaires.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 39 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

imagine wrecking your life working to advance a thing for which the ultimate end goal is to replace you entirely

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

I don't have to imagine :(

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

imagine wrecking your life working to advance a thing for which the ultimate end goal is to replace you entirely

That isn't new with AI. Non-AI Automation has been the goal (and achievement) of business for decades.

[–] mitram@sopuli.xyz 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Automation is great , everything should be automated as much as possible.

IF everyone benefits from it in the form of higher wages/less working hours due to the higher productivity.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

IF everyone benefits from it in the form of higher wages/less working hours due to the higher productivity.

I know this is a common philosophical statement, but I haven't yet seen a great implementation of it in reality. I'm interested if your approach is viable.

Scenario:

Lets say we have a 25 year old worker named Jim. Jim was hired and his job for 1 year was to log into a system, look up specific values, and populate these values into fields in an Excel spreadsheet. At the beginning of the second year, a small Bash script (computer code) was written by an engineer and set to run on a repeating daily schedule that did all of the lookups and sheet population that was Jim's entire job. The entirely of Jim's job has been replaced by automation.

Result:

Jim no longer has any work to do for the organization. There aren't any other open positions at the company for Jim (or if there are Jim is not even remotely qualified to do those other jobs).

  • So how would you apply your philosophy to this situation?
  • Do you believe the organization should continue to employ Jim even without any work for him?
  • Should he be let go, but still paid? If so, how much, and for how long?
[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

UBI is the obvious solution to this and study after srudy has proven its efficacy.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm a proponent of UBI, but that has nothing to do with the "IF everyone benefits from it in the form of higher wages/less working hours due to the higher productivity" philosophy OP posted though.

With UBI, Jim would be getting basic income (like everyone else) irrespective if he ever had the job in the example or not, and irrespective if the automation occurred or not.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 minutes ago

Automation, in the case of UBI, would mean that the productivity gain would translate into less hour worked, with a minimum guaranteed revenue every month/year.

The reality is that automation efficiency is going straight into capitalists pockets. And people having a bigger workload for the same amount of money as before.

Without a societal shift, automation is not for the benefits of the general populace.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

“Learn to work like this now or you will be left behind.” The “experts” say.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

well there goes my chances of landing a job. I had one thing mention a flexible work schedule and I asked them about it like can I make my own hours or shifts or decide how many hours to work or what. Did not hear back. Don't know if they don't like my questions or if they would have blown me off either way.

[–] RelativePlatypus@piefed.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Flexible work schedule == working after hours, and on weekends. Always.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago

if it does they did not reply to explain that. I see flexible work sechedule and I assume they are listing a perk.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Interviewed at a place. Asked how many hours for a normal work week in engineering. They casually say 45-50. Mentally shut that door so damn fast.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 16 hours ago

Honestly I assume 50 if it pays well. Im increasingly seeing where I think they want to float on the idea the experience will lead to a better job with the good pay but want all that. And they are looking for experience that someone would have had to be in the field at least 10 years to get so the person should not need the exp to get better pay. If the corps want to make the recruitment process a sodomy contest then imma out.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I thought the point was to have AI do everything... if you're requiring 12 hour days, doesn't that just mean the AI id failing?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Turns out that the folks who came up with "Move Fast. Break Things." as a business stategy aren't very good at business stategizing.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Remember kids, this is why you never EVER listen to techbros about how to structure society.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

.

XKCD 2030

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago

MAGA is going to replace as many jobs as they can with AI and Robotics. Then MAGA will deal with the 50% unemployment rate by imprisoning people without jobs, are homeless, have too much debt, aren't otherwise employable, will go to work camps, where they will be leased out as slaves to corporations, causing another wave of job losses, and a 75% unemployment rate. And it's all going to happen much faster than anyone believes.

Better start to figure out your own business now, so it can be up and running when 90% of traditional employment is replaced by AI, Robotics, and Slaves.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

996 is the most inhuman idea. What is the point?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

To prop up the system that is needed to prop up the system.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 7 hours ago

Why would any human being consent to this being their life?

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

You have already answered yourself

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

Capitalism is a cancerous disease which will result in our self-annihilation if it isn’t stopped.