this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
152 points (96.3% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14389 readers
74 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-19 SFA 1x07 "Ko’Zeine"
02-26 SFA 1x08 "The Life of the Stars"
03-05 SFA 1x09 "300th Night"
03-12 SFA 1x10 "Rubincon"
TBA SNW 4x01 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 82 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This begs for a response by Robert Ricardo, offering an analgesic cream for those burns. 😂

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

Even a dermal regenerator is going to leave scars with that burn

[–] amikulo@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are these people even watching the show? (probably deliberately disingenuous)

Ake sits up and also wears shoes when things are serious. It a consistent visual cue. I'd be as mad as they were if cadets were dying and she were laying back in the chair just shrugging it off, but that's not at all what is happening. Part of her character is that she is serious only to the extent the situation requires, and I think that casual attitude makes sense for someone who has been around for hundred's of years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlanWake2112@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Online attacks against an actor on a Star Trek show is not very Star Trek philosophy. World needs more Spock’s and less Kahn’s.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 41 points 1 month ago

For the record, if anyone reading this is that sort of person, you can save us a lot of time and just go away now.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like calling Captain Ake "mumbles" is right up there with calling Picard "baldy". I get the feeling we're dealing with the kind of people who think one of those things is okay and the other isn't.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's pretty stupid to pick on Holly Hunter for her trademark.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I can understand her almost 100% not being myself a native English speaker, the problem is not her.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And if you don't, that's what subtitles are for. Hardly much to complain about.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 39 points 1 month ago

The fact that this is happening is a disgrace to those who behave this way: you don’t embody IDIC.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I haven't seen STA yet, but it seems like, with a few exceptions, the most recent Star Trek has always been controversial, since The Next Generation. I feel like Enterprise deserved it the most, and SNW escaped most of it. Discovery probably got it the worst? Though TNG was by far the least deserving of it.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Which I find kinda surprising, since I would call SNW fairly "woke" if you actually pay attention to the show. Maybe it's just because it's a male captain set in the TOS era, and it's a more traditional trek show?

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

SNW is a good balance. Discovery on the other hand, was way too emotional for me. Where is STSA on the crying-every-other-scene scale?

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

My main problem with DIS has a name: Michael Burnham. Not the actress, the script.

And about your question: no, the crying is only in scenes that work (traumatic or sentimental enough) unlike DIS.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I found Discovery the same way, it's the only trek series I couldn't make it through.

Picard suffered from bad writing unfortunately. Season 3 cashed in on nostalgia and I appreciate it for that, but the first 2 seasons were very meh.

Starfleet academy is great though, IF you're ok with a show targeted to young adults. If you're not ok with that, the episodes will be very hit and miss. The most recent episode was fantastic, once you get through the 3 minute long sex scene it opened with. Even that does serve a purpose though to show the bond that's developed between two chars.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont like DIS because it does not feel very trek to me with the ugly klingons and the overall dark stories and characters. Also (like PIC) its very storyline so i cant really just jump into an episode and be happy (or unhappy, whatever story the episode is)            

On the other side i think SNW is what should have been the first series after the pause after ENT. Its hopeful, most episodes can be watched alone and it still has a background story like VOY. And like every trek its woke.

I think that PIC would have gotten a similar (smaller?) shitstorm compared to DIS if that was the first after the pause. LD maybe too but less for the quality and more because its animated. And PRO for feeling more nicelodeon than trek (or rather a mix)              

If DIS came just later than others it would have probably been either more liked or at least ignored like a lot ignore PIC or Short Treks

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Discovery probably "got it the worst" because it came out during peak gamergate-era politics. Online fandoms were weaponized and radicalized into right-wing culture warriors. Discovery is easily the least preachy of any Star Trek series but because it had a black woman in a leading role it became an obvious target for ragebaiters to make stuff up about.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ironically my biggest issue with Discovery is that it's pretty right-wing with its CIA stand-in apologia and blatantly militaristic style in Seasons 1 and 2 at least.

That and the sheer degree of melodrama. Every episode needs to have scenes of at least one or two characters in total anguish. It just wears me down compared to other Treks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally, of the new Star Trek that's come along since the Kelvin timeline was started the only thing I'm taking into my personal canon is Lower Decks. The rest has been completely meh at best, downright awful at worst. Most of it I've simply let pass out of mind and memory.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] encelado748@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Discovery lacked much needed love for the franchise, with lot of nonsensical, lore breaking episodes. The same is true for Picard sadly. But I am finding STSA boasting some of the best episodes for a Star Trek season 1 series so far. Star Trek was always woke, and that is why it was so loved. STSA is no more woke than Voyager was. I see lot of respect from the writers to the previous series. STSA makes me think of TNG much more often than any other nutrek series (except lower deck, but that is nearly fanservice). Being into the future you have a lot of flexibility to do something new, and I like that a lot. Nahla Ake is a different character than Picard or Janeway, and that is fine. A great character nonetheless in my opinion.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's part of a general problem where old trek is basically competence porn (everyone is ridiculously competent at their jobs) while in new Trek everyone kinda acts like a teenager. Maybe it's a desperate attempt to appeal to a younger audience (I don't think that actually works tho), but it certainly doesn't appeal to fans of older Trek.

It definitely breaks immersion to have characters that have serious jobs acting like teenagers.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is literally about people who don’t know how to do the job, being taught how to do the job.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

How old do you have to be to stop swallowing your comm badge? Aren't they all adults in the show?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought the captain was the one that supposed to teach them how to do the job? Why is she acting like a teenager? How are they supposed to learn how to stop acting like teenagers and take their jobs seriously if the captain is acting this way too?

Yeah it's just a show, but characters in a show should be acting as if the world they're in is real. It breaks immersion when they don't.

There's a general fear of being genuine with characters in a lot of shows and movies, and it's gotten really old. It's really cringey at this point.

It would be nice to have a show about people on a spaceship acting like people that are really on a spaceship that have serious jobs. It's boring to have yet another show where it's just people acting like youtube influencers on some spaceship sets. People that actually like vapid youtube influencers will only just watch clips from these shows, so what's the point of trying to appeal to that crowd?

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Do you think she's acting like a teenager in a substantive way, or just in her style?

I like her irreverent attitude and I don't consider that childish. She doesn't act impulsively, thoughtlessly, or disrespectfully. She takes her job seriously. She intentionally goes against the grain of traditional military stuffiness because she is decidedly not trying to train a military.

The underlying military culture of classic Trek made sense at the time, but we can do better. I'm actually optimistic about SFA and that's almost entirely thanks to Hunter's portrayal of Ake.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I like star trek starfleet academy for the most part. What I don't like about the show is that I can't watch it with my kids yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I haven't watched STA. Is the captain really lounging in the chair and going barefoot?

[–] themoken@startrek.website 26 points 1 month ago (28 children)

Yes, but in context it's not a big deal. A lot of it is contrasting her with her peer, the chancellor of the war college, who is uptight. Ultimately, she's less military commander, or even explorer, and more chancellor of a school full of students and in that capacity it makes more sense to generate a relaxed atmosphere. When the situation calls for it, she can be serious as well.

She just has her own style, but people want to be negative because she's not Picard-ing hard enough or some dumb shit.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the contrary it is a big deal, it makes Ake extremely endearing and likeable.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

She reminds me of a few of my professors in both my undergraduate English program and my graduate religious studies program, all of them wonderful and safe-feeling people. She's the first school chancellor we've really seen in Star Trek and she feels very much like a university-level educator to me--with the whole starship command piece being additional to her main job.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›