this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
313 points (99.7% liked)

News

35774 readers
1954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

US President Donald Trump, on Friday, February 13, threatened to try to bypass Congress and force new voting laws ahead of the November midterm elections, where his Republican Party fears losing control of the legislature. Trump said he would soon issue an executive order attempting to impose the rules if Congress does not pass a law requiring photo identification to vote and other nationwide reforms.

Any attempt would likely be met by a legal challenge that could ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court. "There will be Voter ID for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "If we can't get it through Congress, there are Legal reasons why this SCAM is not permitted. I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order," he wrote.

While many jurisdictions across the United States require photo ID to cast ballots, not all do, with Trump and many Republicans arguing without evidence that those areas have permitted significant voter fraud.

The Trump-backed "SAVE America" election reform act passed in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives this week. However, it is expected to fail in the Senate, where the Republican majority is too slim to pass the law without Democratic support.

In addition to requiring a photo ID to cast a ballot, the bill would also require proof of citizenship to register to vote. There is no evidence of meaningful fraud in US elections and critics say that the bill's measures would instead push millions of people away from casting ballots, because they don't have a passport or a paper copy of their birth certificate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we like still doing the constitution?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, states don't get to run their own elections no more

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So we’re just accepting pedofile rule or we’re going to overthrow this bitch?

Non-stop Mr. Burns shenanigans from this guy. Where’s Maggie Simpson when you need her?

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I'm not gonna lie here... as someone who lives in a country that requires photo ID when voting, I am more upset with the fact that you guys don't have a national ID of some kind that is issued for free to everyone regardless of whether they can drive or not. This is a preexisting vulnerability that he's exploiting.

EDIT: "In most cases, you will need either a driver’s license or a state ID to register to vote. If you do not have either of these, you may be able to provide other types of documentation, including a bank statement or utility bill. But the required documents you need to register vary by state. Check with your state’s election office to find out what documentation they accept."

I see some states may have made an attempt at it?

If I'm woefully uninformed, please disregard.

[–] catmandru@thelemmy.club 4 points 22 hours ago

In most cases, you will need either a driver’s license or a state ID to register to vote

That is true in all states here. Republicans are obsessed with having ID at the poll itself. Everything they say about non-citizens voting without ID is a strawman argument because a majority of us Americans are dipshits and believe it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Evidence of citizenship and identification are 2 different things. You can have a driver's license or state ID without being a citizen. Proof of citizenship is more difficult - especially for married women whose names won't match their birth certificate.

The most common reason to prove citizenship right now is when starting a new job, where they'll ask for either a passport or a social security card and state-issued photo ID.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how does a utility bill or a bank statement prove your citizenship in the US?

Those don't prove citizenship, they prove residency, which is something completely different.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago

Which is really covering the greater risk of illegal voting. Way more illegal votes cast by people who move and vote in their former home (possibly in addition to their new home) than non-citizens trying to vote.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You literally already need to prove you are an eligible voter to register to vote.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But if we don’t go further we wouldn’t be able to disenfranchise voters at the ballot box, where they would have no recourse. Think of the children!

[–] Sgarcnl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean the children that got diddled by Trump and Epstien?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Correct. When Republicans say “think of the children” the sick, the evil fuckers mean sexually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fine. I bypass Trump and order new guillotines. The French has made some seriously nice ones this year.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

they were all in one place a couple times last year, we could hit them all in one fell swoop.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 96 points 2 days ago

Proof of citizenship is already required to vote. That's what you're doing when you register to vote. Then, a secondary validation of a sample of ballots is typically completed to ensure that there isn't fraud.

Obviously, they're just trying anything and everything to not lose the midterms, and their voters go rabid over just the mention of voter fraud. I'm just rambling to the void because this new wave of fraud allegations is so fucking stupid and see through.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

THE PRESIDENT IS NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE LAWS! THAT IS NOT HOW THIS WORKS!

God, the US is so beyond fucked.

I already know exactly how this is gonna happen... He's floating it now, he'll DO it in August, a Federal judge will stop it, the Supreme Court will let it stand pending appeal, and then they won't take up the case until December, by which point it won't MATTER what they rule.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 day ago

Not only does the federal government have no authority over elections, the executive especially has no purview there.

That would be completely antithetical to the nature of democratic elections.

But these fascists don't like democracy.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Didn't he try this last year in March, they took him to court, he lost, and his administration didn't even bother to appeal it because they knew he was going to lose? Is this his dementia brain not remembering things?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/preserving-and-protecting-the-integrity-of-american-elections/

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Trump isn't the one pushing this. He says what he's told to say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I was just reading a story this morning, that the GOP is now looking to scuttle the SAVE act as functionally it’d require passports in most all states except a few.

Why are they trying to scuttle it? They finally saw the data that most people who own passports are actually left leaning in nature. Throughout the south, majority of republicans don’t have passports.

This law could inadvertently flip all of the Red strongholds in attempt to get swing states. Gotta love it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

GOP dont travel anywhere outside the us, or even thier state. thats why they have a bubble of communities. if they did they are likely to "Broaden thier horizens about different people" strong if on likely.

it make sense, since the process of getting a passport for the FIRST time is pretty arduous process and takes a long time. plus you have to set up appointments with the usps or some other agency which can be booked weeks or months in advance. plus there is likely even less location in red areas that would do passport processing, which are possibly done in BIG cities. its not as simple as mialing in or going to your local dmv.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

problem here is their states will just vaguely follow it and their courts will say thats fine but blue states saying fuck you would be ruled against. I mean hopefully the courts throw out the congressional over reach and keep states rights but we really don't want the law passed. All the republican laws are there to serve their ends and only will be required to be followed by the executive to the extent it does. enforcement wise. judicial wise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 52 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

These news stories are treating this like a real legal issue, but Trump's EOs have as much jurisdiction on voting procedures as they have in deciding what I'm going to have for dinner. It doesn't need a legal challenge because it doesn't apply to anyone who actually decides what IDs are required.

It should be reported, but as authoritarian ravings completely inconsistent with our voting systems rather than a looming legal clash where we need the Supreme Court to decide what's right.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 32 points 2 days ago

Part of the point is to get that incorrect idea into the minds of the population. It's seeding other 'Jan 6' events in states that correctly ignore Trump's nonsense.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The coverage is fine but the phrasing of these articles is downright subversive. Every single headline should be "Trump pretends he can cancel midterms" or "Trump hallucinates authority to change state voting laws"

Things like "...threatens to order new laws" or "...floats canceling election" or "...nationalize voting security" only serve to muddy the conversation. These things are explicitly not within his power and never will be possible (barring a farce amendment push, which can't happen before November). He cannot do them even if he pretends to do them.

The only thing that could happen is blatantly unconstitutional election interference (probably by force). Add that as a tagline to every article. Then when people show up to ICE goons monitoring their polling place their first thought won't be "hmmm, must be [Trump's new law/a canceled election/national voting security]". They'll properly think "why tf is this guy here?...".

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Trump says it's chicken tonight!

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

After all this bullshit he still doesn't understand how any of this works does he?

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine getting as far as Trump has and not understanding anything just buying your way through life. Then even if he breaks all the laws he still doesn't get any legal punishment beyond paying more but he has tons of money. He's literally looting the US Treasury right now.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as in trumps case, scam your way through life, or failing upwards, and laundering money from russia.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

He's proof the estate tax needs to be 10x what it is.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

He cannot “order new laws”. He doesn’t have that authority.

Unless we are in a fascist regime.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

again. this is a way to legitamize congress having involvement in elections when its up to the states. If he gets away with it great for him. If not it looks like congress doing it is legitamate because him doing it illegally was stopped but states control their voting not the national governement. They have to be constitutional so the courts have some sway but not the legislative or the executive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We saw during the Insurrection that he had several strategies going at once. When he finally called off the attack, we thought it was over, but he knew Plan B - the False Electors Plot - was still in play. This will be the same, they will have multiple strategies.

They are working on a Martial Law plan for before the election, they are working on a Voter ID plan, and possibly armed ICE Apes at polling places for during the election, and I've heard about them seizing ballots and voting machines from Democratic districts and doing a MAGA vote count, for after the election.

And they're probably working on other ideas, too.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

he saw it failed(because pence wouldnt refuse to certify plus the "attack on capitol" made him look really bad" so the stolen election ploy was his contigency plan.

load more comments
view more: next ›