this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
55 points (77.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39270 readers
1333 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Me: Cars

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Limfjorden@feddit.dk 78 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Cars are too prevalent in most countries, but they are undeniably very useful when used correctly. I would probably say the social media does more harm than cars, but idk if it's the worst invention. Lots of candidates.

[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What about the idea of burning oil products in general? Sure, that made powerful and light engines possible, and they have transformed economies, logistics, trade, and entire countries. However, if we hadn’t invented that, progress would have been a lot slower.

Nevertheless, I would argue that the past 200 years of industrial progress weren’t worth the climate crisis.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only correct answer in this thread.

It's the biggest industry in the world by a very large margin and the most destructive one on a global scale.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even advertising isn't necessarily bad, having people telling you about things you might like used to be a good thing.

I personally think it's people like Edward Bernays who had the idea of, I guess, 'Malicious Advertising'. They really solidified the idea of applying propaganda techniques to advertising strategies and that just kind of become expected and the norm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PHLAK@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This begs the question: What level of advertising is okay?

Some level of advertising is surely okay, right?

If I open a bakery and put a sign out front that says "Baked good for sale!" I don't think anyone would complain but that IS advertising.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Religion. So many of today's issues stem from the magical thinking inherent in religion.

[–] 65gmexl3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

nuclear weapons, too feckin dangerous to have

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I'm in mixed mind about them because you're right, they're too destructive, but for the time being their existence has prevented conflicts from breaking out, and since wars are typically only waged with the promise of financing it afterwards via looting or expansion, nobody is really willing to render land unusable in the process of conquering it.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

The problem is that it only takes one ruler insane enough to use them to wipe out most of humanity.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

So far crypto currencies. So far they seem to expend a huge amount of electricity and used mostly for speculation.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 16 points 2 months ago

Easy question:

AI

Net negative pushing us toward unavoidable global ecosystem collapse: it produces nothing but the unfulfilled promise of eventually replacing human workers, which it has never shown the capability to do and according to the researchers who founded the AI companies will never do due to "AI Scaling Laws". It has increased power consumption and costs by over 30% in some US States.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago

A financial system that breeds billionaires

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a three way tie between:

  • Leaded Gas

  • Aerosols

  • Nuclear bombs

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Interesting fact, the same man, Thomas Midgely Jr, invented both tetraethyl-lead as a fuel additive and CFCs, almost killing everyone on earth twice over.

Karma got him in the end after he got tangled in one of his contraptions after he became bedridden with polio and died of strangulation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Midgley_Jr.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago

Slavery. Even after banning it pretty much everywhere, people still find ways to treat others as disposable property.

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

24 hour news networks.

News used to just be the news when there was a half hour of local, half hour of national twice per night with a morning show for fluff, weather, and brief news updates. 24 hour news needed to fill the whole 24 hours and also pay for itself by getting eyeballs on advertisers. That’s when all of the sensationalist stuff started taking over.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Never actually did anything and never actually claimed to. Most people assumed it was a headache relief but the company never said that. They just said to put the shit on your forehead

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

Shareholders.

[–] xep@discuss.online 9 points 2 months ago

It's likely LLMs in their current corporate circular funding form and cryptocurrency.

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Disposable vapes come to mind, although the real answer is probably some extremely depraved torture device.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The wheel. Everything went downhill from there.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 18 points 2 months ago

In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Social media year over year shows it was a mistake.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That was actually a great invention, considering it replaced the unlimited hour work week (60-96 hours being normal in Victorian times). I agree that we should go further though.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Always room for improvement, but to think the 40 work week was a bad idea shows how little history they know.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Either leaded gasoline or pfas

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago

Weapons of mass destruction, obviously.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

Weapon of mass destruction

[–] Janx@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Leaf blowers. They solve nothing permanently, it just moves around the leaves, meaning the blowers will be back again tomorrow, waking me up...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] ving_thor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Leaded Gasoline comes to mind...

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

[Gestures broadly to Thomas Midgley Jr.] [Link]

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

industrialization.

it's caused unfathomable damage to us, our planet, and the organisms we share our world with.

it's also saved just as many as it's harmed, but there is an upper limit when our planet dies and we all die with it.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nisemikol@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 months ago

I think it has to be something that poses an existential threat to human life on this planet, so cars (and other inventions dependent on fossil fuels) is a pretty good pick for the top of the list, IMO. I saw someone in the comments pick animal agriculture, and that, too, contributes to the existential threat of a warming planet; so that, too, feels like a good pick for the top of the list.

For me, though, nuclear weapons has to be the worst thing we've ever invented. No other invention is capable of ending human life on this planet so quickly and so thoroughly.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Property ownership

[–] pir8t0x@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Coffee pods. Just when we were getting close to maybe reduce or reliance and dependency on plastics BOOM! coffee pods everywhere, by the trillions.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›