this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
241 points (86.4% liked)

politics

28225 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

The revelation about the sulphuric acid sparked wild speculation on social media as to what Epstein needed it for, including to 'destroy evidence or even human remains' - despite there being no evidence of criminal use.

I think you may be confusing "wild speculation" with reason.

What would be the other conclusion you draw when you hear a sex trafficking pedophile who murdered and tortured his victims, ordered multiple drums of sulphuric acid to be delivered to his private island the same day a federal investigation was announced?

But further emails in the documents, dating back to 2013, suggest Epstein used sulphuric acid on the private island to purify water.

RO stands for Reverse Osmosis - a water purification system - while sulphuric acid is widely used in water treatment, specifically to soften, adjust pH, and enhance the efficiency of other chemicals during purification processes.

Oh well as long as that's what he'd always been ~~dissolving bodies in~~ using to purify water, nothing to see here. Just like there was nothing to see in the entire decade between first being arrested for sex trafficking a minor in 2008 and charged with "soliciting prostitution of a minor," continuing to do insane business transactions with powerful elites and banks who still won't release records of those transactions, and ending up dead in his jail cell with a federal record date of death listed the day before he actually died at the exact time security footage resets itself, and both guards take a meal break so there are no witnesses. Oh and 2 minutes are missing because glitches happen.

There's no need for wild speculation because there's always some perfectly logical explanation for why none of this is what it looks like.

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago

They raped and killed. Now we are all out of rape and time to _____ the guilty

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Sulphuric acid does not dissolve humans.

Be easier to just toss the bodies in the ocean, the acid is for pools

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes it does, it's a matter of volume, exposure, and time. Dahmer used hydrochloric acid which is more effective.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's also used in desalinization. A technology that's pretty useful when you're on an island surrounded salt water

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Yep and far more likely the reason for the order.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What was the point of the video?

[–] Zanathos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It was probably tied to the article. The video is meant to show potentially doctored footage of another inmate walking into Epsteins jail sector the same night and time of his death, but the jail record claimed no one else being in the sector at his time of death.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 202 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The records seem to indicate it was used as part of the island's reverse osmosis water treatment system. There I saved you a click.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. But how much? It's just used for that doesn't tell me if that's a normal amount for reverse osmosis or if it's triple the amount of a normal scenario.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

It would depend on how much water they treated.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I kind of consider that to be plausible. 330 gallons sounds like a lot but it's only 6 barrels and there's way more effective ways to get rid of bodies (which I think is the implication). Also, justice isn't being achieved, not because of lack of evidence here, but because disgusting crimes are being covered up, and disgusting people being protected. I'm ok focusing on "why aren't any men in jail for this right now?"

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What's funny is the UK? wants someone to step down cause they hired someone on the list. They fired him a year ago but they still want him to step down. Well US is like whatever. Who cares.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I've been boggled by American inaction in this and I wonder if it's because there's no recall function in our system? Maybe folks are just waiting for the midterms, but we aren't seeing civil consequences (firings, boycotts, etc) either. It genuinely seems like there's something uniquely American about the lack of consequences here

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 39 minutes ago

I’ve been boggled by American inaction

I mean it's pretty clear why: Trump's name appeared more than a million times in the unredacted Epstein files according to Rep. Jamie Raskin

The highest office in the country benefits from the inaction.

I know it's not really the same thing in the UK, but even within the royal family and public opinion, if it had been Charles instead of Andrew, do you think he would willingly be giving up his royal title and everything that goes with it, even if other members of the family were pressuring him?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Also you’d buy in bulk because the cost of delivery is probably the same.

[–] epicthundercat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We wouldnt have to speculate if the DOJ would do their job in a way that allows the population to trust them. We dont get that though, so we have to be the justice ourselves to a degree by demanding total transparency and that also means questioning to ensure information comes out if its there. Thats my take.

People are being left to fill in the gaps and that causes mass confusion and makes people question real evidence. Its not okay

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't disagree at all. The process we're forced to go through because we seem to be the only ones that care is maddening

[–] epicthundercat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its so depressing, honestly and its purposeful. They want confusion. The American government is pretty damn good at Gaslighting and confusing the public, honestly... It wouldnt be the first time... and I have never been one of those tinfoil hat types. You can even go back and think about the Tuskegee experiment, MKUltra ect... among others... Its messed up how much they view us as manipulatable pawns... and this isnt to say other Governments dont engage in similar crap, too but ours is pretty dang experienced in the art of deception now.

P.S. MK Ultra feels cheesy to bring up at all due to the stigma but it happened and its messed up but its an example of purposeful manipulation.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The volume is a tote, aka an IBC container

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_bulk_container

Super common and readily available for both legitimate and/or illegal purposes.

[–] commie_rogers@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Document specifically states 6 55-gal drums.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Must not have a forklift on the island in that case

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

are you telling me epstein couldn't labor traffic one forklift certified worker

[–] commie_rogers@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Non sequitir.

The presence of an IBC tote would imply the presence of some equipment necessary to move it (at least a pallet jack, possibly a forklift), maybe.

However, the inverse does not follow: absence of a tote does not imply the absence of the equipment needed to move one. The presence or absence of the equipment is logically independent of the absence of the equipment (even though it would be be implied by the presence of the equipment).

This is called denying the antecedent. The conditional does not imply the inverse. In symbolic terms:

Conditional: p → q
Inverse: ¬p → ¬q

(p → q) → (¬p → ¬q) is false.

If you're going to make claims on the Internet, it's worth learning at least a little propositional logic.

[–] STUNT_GRANNY@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also, forklift attachments exist specifically for grabbing and moving barrels around. One of them is called a parrot beak.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

Couldve also used a barrel dolly. Frankly I don't really care if Jeffrey Epstein was forklift certified.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] commie_rogers@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

It sure seems like it sometimes 🤣

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yea seems a lot easier to just take a body out to sea and drop it. They won't even know where it ends up between the depth and the currents. I doubt a body would even last that long on the sea bed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] idyllic@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

It may not be for dissolving bodies. But since the timing is suspect and indicative of some coverup, I would guess probably destroying trace DNA evidences.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

yeah, it just seems licentious since most of us have no reason to buy sulphuric acid, let alone such large quantities.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (9 children)

It’s also, like not even that much for this kind of janitorial purpose. To add to that, while it sounds insidious, sulphuric acid isn’t the nefarious thing it sounds like.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

If only the current American administration could be bathed in it.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good goddess that thumbnail is horrifying.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

I'm guessing similar shots of the orange choad were the only things his team of buffoons managed to not release in the "redactions" they've been doing

[–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sulphuric acid is not the clean and easy method to dissolve a body as you might think and Hollywood might suggest.

[–] CarterH739@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I second this. Sulfuric acid was my entire job for eleven years. It would definitely do the job, but it's not as simple as dropping a body into a drum with it. You'd need a lot more of it, heat, pumps for a circulation system, filtration for the parts that it won't eat through right away (hair and fingernails, possibly teeth). There are much more efficient ways to get rid of a body. Especially on an island.

[–] PoliteDudeInTheMood@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

If he was ordering hydrogen peroxide as well that would be more in line with the complete destruction of organic material

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"Would you like a free bath?"

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Downvote this whenever you see it, it's either bait or just dumb reporting.

load more comments
view more: next ›