this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
19 points (95.2% liked)

Formula 1

10959 readers
104 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


๐Ÿ“† F1 Calendar
๐Ÿ FIA Documents
๐Ÿ“Š F1 Pace


2026 Calendar

Location Date
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 06-08 Mar
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China 13-15 Mar
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 27-29 Mar
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ Bahrain 10-12 Apr
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Saudi Arabia 17-19 Apr
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 01-03 May
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 22-24 May
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco 05-07 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 12-14 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 26-28 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain 03-05 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 17-19 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 24-26 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 21-23 Aug
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy 04-06 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 11-13 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 24-26 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 09-11 Oct
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 23-25 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 30 Oct-01 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 06-08 Nov
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States 19-21 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 27-29 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi 04-06 Dec

Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโ€™t want to become formuladank.
  8. No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It feels a bit more like Formula E on steroids.

Energy management leads to amazing racing in FE and negates much of the dirty air driven boring processional races.

The first few races will likely be a bit chaotic but once the teams get on top of it all, the most talented drivers will be able to get ahead of less smart drivers in better cars.

[โ€“] Microw@piefed.zip 2 points 6 days ago

I also think that what the drivers are experiencing at the moment is due to the teams having built their cars and started driving very close to the regulations. They havent really experimented with energy management yet. It's clear that drivers like Fernando, Lewis and Max dislike driving slow in the corners. So their teams will need to find ways to become faster in the corners and recharge the battery elsewhere, if they want their drivers to enjoy racing.

[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

How many cars did he slam? All of them??

[โ€“] santa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Good article. Keep in mind that journalists of articles donโ€™t write their headlines. That is typically done by their editor.

[โ€“] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Is it that good though? They basically just wrote down what he said

[โ€“] CJCKit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Verstappen makes mild comments about how the new regulations mean he doesnโ€™t get to drive in his preferred styleโ€ฆ

[โ€“] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Even if we take your generous interpretation of what he said, is he wrong? It's pretty clear he can still be "fast" in the new car, but it doesn't mean he enjoys driving that way. There's nothing wrong with saying he doesn't enjoy the new regulations. Hamilton and Alonso both have given similar opinions and when the three most decorated drivers tell you it sucks maybe there's some truth here? Maybe the regulations have shifted too much from being fast to being energy efficient.

[โ€“] CJCKit@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Definitely not wrong of him to say. If anything, I was commenting on the disparity between the headline and the article. As suggested above, it seems the headline was written by someone different to the main text.

[โ€“] baru@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In a Dutch interview he said it's way slower. You're really twisting his words.

[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

In a Dutch interview he said itโ€™s way slower.

It's not like that the TV audience is ever going to notice that, given how much TV direction prefers to take out the sense of speed.

[โ€“] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Lewis Hamilton said something like that too I think.

[โ€“] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if increasing energy capacity would improve things and if the FIA could amend the regulation in that direction next year

[โ€“] Goodeye8@piefed.social 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My understanding of the regs is that giving more capacity doesn't really solve the problem because the problem isn't capacity, it's the recharging speed. You can deplete your battery on a straight and be fast but if the battery doesn't get recharged by the time you get to the same straight you're not going to be consistently fast. To be consistently fast the battery would need to be fully charged every time you want to use it. That's why you're seeing lift and coast. Not because they ran out of power but because lift and coast recharges the battery more. If the batteries would charge faster we'd probably have drivers complaining less about the cars.

[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

My understanding of the regs is that giving more capacity doesnโ€™t really solve the problem because the problem isnโ€™t capacity, itโ€™s the recharging speed.

But the teams wanted exactly that when they fought tooth and nail against front-axle recuperation out of fear that Audi would have some secret sauce there.