this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
659 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

22043 readers
3666 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

With an audio track I feel like a well timed bleep can actually make a scene funnier. Doesn't work as well if you're trying to play it serious though.

When it comes to text censoring isn't worth it IMO, at least the type where you blank out part of the word or use a derivative. Everyone can still tell what word you meant so if it was important enough to include then use the actual word. If it wasn't that important then you don't need to write the word you're worried about in the first place - there are other words that can be used for insults or emphasis.

[–] schema@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I always found it funny when I see a censored middle finger on TV in the US. It's like they are drawing more attention to it by censoring it. And everyone knows what's behind the pixelation. It's so pointless.

[–] ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

The video "the count censored" is quite good.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I always find it funny how in other countries, there isn't so much a stigma for kids being exposed to cursing and swearing in something like cartoons. I have always hated how music even has to be censored to appease the—let's face it—minority (probably religious) who happen to like everything else about the song except for language they deem unworthy. The artist expresses themselves with honesty. If you can't handle that, tough shit. Listen to a podcast or Kidsbop. FFS

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

I know, I feel bad. One of the favorite things I used to say back in the frumpin' day was "Dude, it's the internet, you can cuss here".

Then slowly over the years, site after site after site after site after site started implementing rules against profanity. Not even in a somewhat sane, reasonable, or consistent way either. Which made it all the worse.

And now, annoying as it is for me personally, I just bite my t0%#$#gue and move on.

Still find it incredibly ridiculous that you can get banned from a certain R-word site for using the R-word, but calling someone or referring to them as a "cocksucker" is apparently perfectly acceptable.

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 hours ago

I feel the same about trigger warnings where the warnings are more triggering than the content. The ridiculous ones have petered somewhat, but at its peak you'd see stuff like

TW: mental health, suicide, self harm, narcissistic abuse

Post: I feel sad today :( my mum is telling me to clean and she doesn't get me

[–] Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I actually like censored swear words in written text. At least when they are censored enough that you can't tell what the swearword is, but you know the intention behind it.

Deliberate misspellings are obnoxious though

[–] pulsey@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

what the fudge?

[–] Haunt@thelemmy.club 21 points 6 hours ago

The internet being censored is one of the most incredibly ridiculous things to happen in our lifetime. Nothing missed the point harder that corporate internet. Even that's an oxymoron.

[–] aeration1217@lemmy.org 11 points 6 hours ago

These memes with little strips of white over a word or letter are so cringe, it makes me feel awkwardness for others policing their own language.. online

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 13 points 7 hours ago

I so identify with this lady.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

It is annoying. You know what you wanted to write. We know what you wanted to write. The algorithm know what you wanted to write. And if you're so inclined, your god/gods knows what you wanted to write.

If you write "f*ck this sh!t", you've offended exactly the same number of people you would have with "fuck this shit". Stop acting like a posing saint and just say what you're saying anyway.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

But think of the ~~children~~ upper management! How else will they pitch advertisement opportunities to their providers while promoting healthy environment interactions and maintaining record profits for the next quarter??

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

👏if you want to censor something, don't write it 👏

Writing is a tool for communication. Writing something implies your desire to communicate it.

This might land a little controversial but I'll go one step further and say you should not censor racial/homophobic slurs if they are not being used for offense. For example:

"I hate my cop neighbor, I heard he called my niece a f***ot"

(I obviously censored it here because lemmy prob. has a filter for that shit.)

In this sentence, I am not attacking anyone and I am simply trying to communicate a bad act done by somebody else. The message of the sentence is not homophobic in any way and me censoring the nasty word definitely didn't change anything about the message. People can still hear that word loud and clear.

So if you think including the word would be offensive for people, and think it's not a crucial part of your message, simply don't write it.

"I hate my cop neighbor, I heard he called my niece a homophobic slur"

There you go. You did not communicate the word f***ot and your audience did not receive it. A successful example of self censorship

[–] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

bad word bad! no context! only hurt feelings! whos feelings? an imaginary person that might get offended! also they are underage.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you write "f*ck this sh!t", you've offended exactly the same number of people you would have with "fuck this shit".

More people. You've also offended the people who are fucking tired of this censorship bullshit, who would've been completely fine with the uncensored version.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

…but it was the right more people…

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How else am I supposed to say bri*ish?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Just say "the better English speakers"

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

Better? They can hardly pronounce their own language.

[–] aciddev@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 hours ago

"English (Traditional) speakers."

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, but when they censor words on Metalocalypse they use guitar rifts and I enjoy that over the actual profanity.

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Honestly, some writers have gotten pretty creative with censorship. Firefly's use of "in universe" curses are a good example.

Plus such classics as the tv edit of The Big Lebowski's "Find me in the alps!"

I would prefer no censorship, but that's no reason to disregard the fine work of creators trying to make the best of a bad situation.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Firefly's use of "in universe" curses are a good example.

Also, The Good Place

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

Oh! Good observation! And I agree

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We always told our kids that if we heard them saying something hurtful, they were going to get in trouble, whether or not they used a cuss word. If they used a cuss word in a way that wasn't hurtful, we didn't care. The caveat being that lots of other adults, including many teachers, do care, so they should watch their audience.

By the same token, if they were singing a song or quoting someone that used a cuss word, we'd rather they say the word than self-censor it. If everyone know what word you mean, what's the point?

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

By the same token, if they were singing a song or quoting someone that used a cuss word, we'd rather they say the word than self-censor it. If everyone know what word you mean, what's the point?

What if it's a white person singing a song that contains the slur against black people?

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

Honestly, I feel the same way. This "he who shall not be named" thing is dumb. If the song is offensive, it's still going to be offensive if you replace it be saying "the N word" or whatever. But I'd also go back to the "know your audience" thing. If there's someone in ear shot who is going to be triggered by a white person singing it, then maybe don't sing it.

[–] chaotic_disorganizer@lemmy.world 47 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yeah. Censoring isn't everywhere because people complained, it's because advertisers complained.

[–] loonmusic@piefed.ca 16 points 7 hours ago

The irony is movies shown on TV with people being murdered and blood flying everywhere and bleeping out the swearing.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 57 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 hours ago

Listening to music on yt, hit a censored word "God dammit!" skip rest of song, force search back to "lyrics" as they are seldom edited like that

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

they are called grawlixes in comics. i wonder if the artist used asterisks to avoid this conversation or because they didn't know.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 hours ago

I don't think they're referring to grawlixes at all, but rather the censorship when people are texting or speaking.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

TIL what those are called.

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

And don’t get me started on people who say ‘ahh’

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

what is that? what is that "ahh" thing?

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what that refers to, and I'm not getting it from the replies.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (5 children)
[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I am 20. I hate algospeak so bad. But "ahh" kinda stuck in my tongue

"ahh" feels like the sound you'd make when you try to say "ass" quickly

I feel like "ass" and "ahh" conveys different feelings so I use them interchangably. But I still cringe a bit because "ahh" originated from algospeak

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

In speaking I don't mind it tbh, I just hate how it's spelled, as I can't help but read it as the noise you make with your mouth open at the doctor, which sounds all kinds of wrong.

[–] aciddev@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

More like algospeak, there's a lot of adequate but quiet gen-z'ers, believe me they despise it as much as everyone else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even hate it so much if it were spelt better. Ahh reads like the noise the doctor asks you to make. I can't help but read it like that in my head, and my head doesn't like it. I'm not even sure what the phonetically correct spelling would be. Even aaa would be better imo.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Ahh is a word I use for thinking sounds (ahh, uhm, um) so I keep reading it as that and then I have to reread it. Annoying!

load more comments
view more: next ›