this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
270 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

13785 readers
300 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 9 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

What I don't understand is, have these people never heard of OAuth? I don't know what it is, we have decades of this and people act like it doesn't exist and don't see the value in it. Even Lemmy, try to suggest why it might be valuable to separate identity versus community hosting, it's like you have to walk people through it step by step.

There's no way I'm giving platforms like this even more private information, but if governments put forth both publicly available OAuth servers along with the possibility of privately purchasable OAuth servers for this sort of thing, I would have no problem with it because then you have the possibility of vetting age authenticators like you would VPN providers, and the data would never leak into the social networks that abuse it. It's like the regulators and the Internet has conveniently forgotten about OAuth and certificate authorities and has just said, "Yeah, let's just have users leak their data all over for this" as if there were no better way. Maybe that's the point, because I suspect organizations like Palantir will be quite happy at things like this.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 3 points 10 hours ago

If governments

America has left the chat.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Honestly, we should start doing hardware-based age verification instead. Have the government run a simple yes/no service for individuals to be able to verify their age. The service simply asks if you’re over 18, and the government responds with a simple yes/no.

You verify your identity on the device once when setting it up, it asks the government if you’re over 18, and then your user account is verified as an adult when the “yes” response is returned. The only time it would need to be repeated is when someone turns 18, which would be something the user would need to manually prompt their device to retry. And notably, the government isn’t being pinged for every site you visit, they only got pinged for the initial device setup. So they don’t get access to any of your browsing data.

Now your phone can automatically send a “yes, I’m over 18” signal to any site or service that asks. And kids won’t be verified, meaning they won’t even be able to see the “are you over 18” prompts; they’ll simply be booted off the site (or in Discord’s case, restricted) as soon as it automatically asks their device for an age verification. No action is required on the user’s part, and the site/service didn’t need any invasive info about who you are. As far as an adult is concerned, they got direct access to the site without any kind of annoying “are you over 18” prompt. And as far as a child is concerned, they got automatically redirected right back to Google’s home page as soon as they clicked the porn link.

For shared devices (like computers) it could be handled on a per user basis. You verify your age on Windows/Linux/MacOS when creating the account, and then whenever you’re logged in, any site can simply ask if you’re over 18. Don’t want your kid to stumble across porn? Don’t verify their account. Now safeguarding kids on the internet is as simple as parents safeguarding their computer password and refusing to verify their child accounts.

It’s basically the best of all worlds:

  • The government/private data brokers don’t get free access to your browsing data, like what would happen if every individual site asked the government for verification. This is our current reality, with data brokers hoovering up photos of IDs to feed to their data scientists.
  • The adult user only needs to take action once to verify their age, and then after that the age gates are automatically opened. You don’t need to verify independently with each site, because your device handles that automatically during the initial handshake.
  • Sites don’t get any additional personal info about you, except for the automatic pass/fail hardware response saying that you’re over 18. They don’t need to collect your info to pass to a third party verification system. They don’t need to ask the government, because that has already been done. And they don’t need to worry about things like GDPR compliance for collected info, because there is no additional collected info.
  • Your browsing info isn’t shared with third parties, because the sites/services you use have no need to ask third parties for verification.

Of course it’ll never happen though, because it would restrict what kinds of info data brokers could collect and sell.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

They have and they don’t want it because it doesn’t give them access to everyone’s biometric data.

I could see this coming a long way off with Discord. It’s a honey trap. They swallow entire communities whole like some gargantuan leviathan of antiquity.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 21 hours ago

Trusting the teen abusers with biometric data? https://lemmy.world/post/42942639

[–] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Discord was always an overhyped crap.

[–] Gyangrene@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Trying to get my friend group to switch over to Stoat (formerly Revolt) as soon as possible – I think Matrix is a harder sell for people not already in the federated spaces, or non-tech savvy people, but I'm hoping it fits the need.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

I am on matrix partially and am going to go on stoat.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Something is busted because I wanted tonregister, it said it would verify my email, the verification expired before I even got the email, hours later.

[–] Gyangrene@piefed.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

From what I can gather, I think the Stoat team is likely experiencing insanely heavy and unexpected traffic to their platform, and their server is still trying to catch up - I am also running into the same problem, but I assume the team is working hard behind the scenes to get everyone in and stabilize the platform as soon as they can!

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stoat seems to be very early in development still. Matrix has gotten easier for non-technical users recently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Discords about to lose a lot of users

[–] Xylight@feddit.online 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt it. this doesn't really affect the majority of people, it just makes all accounts "teens" by default which blocks suspected nudity and age restricted channels

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago

With discord pushing more adverts now at least they can't advertise gambling sites to teen accounts

[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah just like Reddit and Twitter and Threads etc. etc.?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frank@lemmy.fraxoweb.com 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I already built my Matrix server. I'm ready for Discord's enshitification

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a way to get it to look like discord?

If not, I've been looking into Root and Stoat instead. Those both look nearly identical. Stoat can even use discord bots.

[–] frank@lemmy.fraxoweb.com 1 points 14 hours ago

You mean Matrix to look like Discord? It depends on the client that you use I guess. I use FulffyChat and it's identical to Discord and Stoat (having tried it myself).

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is that an open source alternative?

[–] frank@lemmy.fraxoweb.com 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ISolox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Does Matrix support screen sharing yet? IDK why I'm having such an issue getting a solid answer other places.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Read: Discord is de-anonymizing all users.

Leeeave.

[–] CidVicious@piefed.zip 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Went ahead and canceled my nitro.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Also cancelled mine. I don't suspect this change will actually directly affect me personally, but it's the final straw on a big pile of straw. I know plenty of people here will admonish those of us that were paying for it in the first place, but better late than never I say.

Not entirely sure what I'm going to transition my group to. It's quite likely we won't actually have one replacement, but many. We used text, voice, video, and screensharing on Discord (plus many other, though less important features). I don't know of an alternative that does all of it.

[–] Pheta@fedia.io 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure about what you mean by video (using cameras, or posting videos) But I did check out Teamspeak, as I used to use it a long time ago, and it's a nice medium between ease of use products like discord and security minded folks who use things like Matrix.

Either way, Teamspeak did add screen sharing, and the cost to host a server is about the price of a nitro sub. That's if you don't self host, which is always an option and makes things free.

It's probably going to be the best option to convince my friends to finally leave discord's ecosystem. Haven't liked it since they started adding in bs like quests and the shop, it's only a matter of time before it enshittifies so bad my friend group will be looking for a way to jump ship.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

I mean video calls. I play ttrpgs online and that's a must for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Frankly it should be illegal.

Not just "never required." Explicitly disallowed.

load more comments (1 replies)

Considering my friend whom I never thought would migrate contacted me first about this I think Discord is pretty fucked.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think this is the a major step in discords plan to be a service to games (ie business-to-business).
They are positioning themselves to be an age-verifying platform for games, alongside in-game chat, in-game VoIP, in-game store and game community.

At some point, games are going to have to require age verification. It's just the way the "protect the children" bullshit is going (instead of "enable the parents to raise their kids", which is far to socialist and progressive) Or game shops will. But if you don't sell your game, that bypasses game shops. And if cracks can bypass purchasing, then... It's on the game to comply with laws.
If there is in-game chat: needs age verification.
If there is in-game voip: needs age verification.

At some point, discord is going to roll out this massive suite of dev tooling that "just works" for devs creating multiplayer games with voip, chat, in-game purchases, gifting in-game purchases to friends, friends lists, out-of-game chat, game communities etc. while also offering age verification.
It already does a lot of that.
They are getting ahead of the age verification laws so they offer a very simple path for developers to "just pay discord" to skip a HUGE legal minefield, and get a bunch of functionality for whatever cut discord decides .

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's for everyone who wants to access adult content or get messages from people they might not know, according to their release.

[–] CidVicious@piefed.zip 30 points 1 day ago

Discord's filters are kind of infamously bad about what they detect as "adult content." I, for one, will not be supplying an ID to anyone. They've already given me several compelling reasons not to to give them money, but it seems that this one finally pushed me over the edge.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Which includes many of the wargaming, traditional art, and queer Discord servers my partner and I use. Never assume that when a bad actor says “adult content” they mean hardcore porn and snuff, they mean everything that doesn’t conform to their ideal christofascist ethnostate purity. And now they have a list of all the “dangerous” nonconformists while blocking everyone else from being exposed to “dangerous” ideas. This should chill people to the bone. Nobody should be okay with this anywhere, in any capacity, in any quantity, whatsoever.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 hours ago

Isn't it only servers/channels marked as NSFW? If you don't mark it as NSFW then it shouldn't make any different to how it is now.

Also it just detects things it can read. Stick it in a file format discord doesn't understand, or link to an external site.

Even if it is hardcore porn, that still doesn't mean I'm going to give them an ID/pictures to verify who I am just so I can see the art people draw of ███████████████.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the "stone the gays" people are the ones who get to decide what is and isn't adult content

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

Charlie kirk getting his neck exploded wasn't considered adult content by discord when I tried it.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who doesnt love getting spearphisted by all these random girls on discord that send friend requests without ever talking to you?!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I only have the app because a handful of people have asked to add me on it. I can't recall the last time I actually opened it, let alone used it to talk to someone. Actually, I think the last time I used it was not for socializing, but to get support for a game mod. (For some reason, instead of having an FAQ page, the creator directed people to their Discord. I feel like that's more annoying for the creator, answering the same questions individually over and over again instead of just having a webpage that users can read and find their own answers on. But, okay, if you wish.)

Totally not worth the privacy invasion. Brb gonna take two seconds and delete the app from my phone.

Edit: it is done

[–] commander@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know Element sucks compared to Discord but with more users and potential funding interest from that user base growth, it can get a lot better and snowball to fast improvements. Blender was the butt of jokes until version 2.8. Like 15 years of being easily dismissed as major commercial production worthy. Element can get better. It's the story of pretty much all the well regarded general consumer targeted open source software we use today

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›