this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
46 points (97.9% liked)

News

35598 readers
2527 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

And these numbers may just touch the surface. Police-reported crime is partly a measure of crime and partly a measure of reporting crime. In a high-crime environment, people often stop calling the police for “smaller” thefts — because the expectation becomes that nothing will happen, or because the hassle isn’t worth it. So even these ugly numbers likely understate how saturated daily life could feel with property crime.

Saved y'all a click

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 36 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

not to be rude, but this in no way encapsulates the main points in the article.

actual reasons given are:

  • better physical security (locks, lighting, alarms, controlled building entry)
  • surveillance technology (doorbell cameras, building cameras, smartphones)
  • less profitable theft (cheaper electronics, tracking devices, decline of cash)
  • higher perceived risk of getting caught

“The bottom line is that we changed our environment in a way that made burglary and robbery harder to pull off, less profitable, and more likely to fail.“

[–] NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I think "less profitable theft" is a big one. What is there worth stealing in a house these days?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 12 hours ago

Laptops. Jewelry, particularly gold.

Phones and ipads can usually be locked down. While that is possible for laptops, it's not typical, except for the log in. It's becoming more common, which is good for overall crime.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 6 points 11 hours ago

Well TVs... think about that again, Price of TVs has gone down, size has gone up. pick up a nice 50" or 70" TV for $200 or less.

Big, hard to move, fragile... Very bulky, very non descrete... and pawn shops are kind of over loaded with them so... big cut in price.

Games consoles are probably it, but obviously only a hand full per house, and thanks to the modern era having more digital games, accounts etc... New risks in ways you can get caught and you can't steal the games with it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

TVs, game consoles

Lets say the theft is successful of a TV or game console. The thief likely wants cash, not consumer electronics. So they need a way to convert stolen goods into cash. Any TV worth money worth bothering with is also very large and fragile which is a problem for offloading it. Sure, there's craigslist and facebook marketplace, but there aren't many that will buy a TV off of those because of the likelihood something is already wrong with it, and TVs just aren't that expensive new. Many consoles also have a theft reporting function that will block or limit how the console can be used. I imagine this also make theft of a console a high risk, low reward path.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But the data doesn't support any of those reasons. But they do have data showing less reporting... So.......

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 4 points 14 hours ago

actual data in the article:

  1. direct crime statistics: 80% drop in burglaries, 66% drop in property crime overall, FBI data showing 2023-2024 had the sharpest single-year decline on record

  2. academic citation: a 2021 paper that “directly links the startling drop in burglary to security improvements”

  3. specific numbers: Chicago went from 50,000 burglaries to much lower levels

[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

My place has been broken into, while I was home, and was armed. Walked him out the front door and went back to watching TV. Cops won't do shit.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It wasn't tech that solved this issue, it was legislation. The avenues for hawking your wares became much smaller and more scrutinized, therefore much harder to make a buck selling people's shit.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Interesting suggestion of profitability of stolen goods. Might also mention de-leaded gasoline tho…

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago

Article is a big pile of verbal bloat with a few bits of actual info to pick out. The comments here summarize it pretty well.