this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
549 points (97.6% liked)

News

35668 readers
2807 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

American Government under budget and ahead of schedule for the first time in living memory and y'all are out here complaining.

Incredible.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they have any shame or fear of repercussions. At this stage, the law doesn't apply to them.

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Of course not and it never did, the law is written by them.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

Damn conspiracy theorists... just because CCTV didn't have NTP enabled...
~/s~

[–] cutemarshmallow@europe.pub 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not that i'd ever want to talk to him, but I wonder what he thought of death given his wealth, power, and apparent obsession with eugenics, and the fact that he was facing life imprisonment. I wonder if he evee even thought about how long he wanted to live or how he would go.

[–] MoreMagic@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

He either wanted to die, or at least was cool with it. A couple of weeks before his death there was a failed suicide attempt, or failed murder. Either way - during the interview after that event, Epstein was calm and smiling. He showed no distress what so ever.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 135 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Fun fact: Anybody can type any date they want into Word. They could have dated it March 15, 44 B.C., since that string of characters isn't document meta-data. When I worked at a law firm, it was common to create a new document by opening an older file, editing it, and saving it as a new one. Quite possibly, the legal assistant edited an August 9th press release to create the draft, and forgot to change the date before saving. Further, this press release comes from the U.S. Attorney's office, which is a different location, with entirely different staff, from the corrections center. It would make exactly zero sense to get the U.S. Attorney, much less the legal assistants, in on a conspiracy. Keep the number of conspirators to a minimum; that's like Conspiracy 101.

There's are a lot of odd circumstances around his death, but as evidence of something fishy, this is super weak.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

i'm trying to remember, wasn't Barr running the US Attorney's office? or was it just the bureau of prisons and the entire rest of the department of justice?

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I agree. It’s not like they would leak that they would kill Epstein to the person drafting press releases…

[–] febra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I personally don't know how the US government functions, but I know people that worked for various big insurance companies and they had a system in place with all the templates and things such as the date would be autofilled by it. I wouldn't expect the US government to just have a random folder with random templates that they pick and edit in Word.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 155 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This is 1000x more likely to be a clerical error or time zone thing rather than a conspiracy.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)

His body was supposedly discovered on August 10 at 6:30am. Which time zone are you suggesting?

Edit: also it says Friday, August 9, 2019 which is much harder to make a mistake.

I don't see the document in the article, here it is: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013180.pdf

This looks like it was a draft. Here's the final version https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/statement-manhattan-us-attorney-death-defendant-jeffrey-epstein it is slightly modified and adds "of apparent suicide"

Occam's Razor says that explanation with fewest assumptions is likely the right one. With all the other coincidences that led to his death, his apparent suicide requires a lot of more assumptions.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Occam's Razor says that explanation with fewest assumptions is likely the right one.

Yeah, the Occam's razor answer definitely isn't that someone reused an existing document from the day before and forgot to change the date. That's just unbelievable. It's more likely that this was a premeditated murder and someone filed the paperwork a day early on accident.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yeah:

  • someone reused an existing document and put wrong date
  • the camera observing his cell failed
  • the redundant camera observing his cell also failed
  • the remaining cameras that could capture something apparently turn off for 3 minutes every day (that's apparently normal for security cameras)
  • they accidentally removed him from suicide watch
  • he managed to kill himself despite cells being designated to prevent that
  • he was missing a cell buddy just for that night
  • three fractures on his neck which are unusual to hanging

Each of them could be explained somehow through assumptions, but there are quite a lot of assumptions, don't you think?

I would imagine that in 21 century, FBI would have system to enter such notices and it would populate it with current date, because why would you want to modify date if you aren't doing anything shady?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The first bullet point is infinitely more trivial than the others, and knowing way too much about document management and content management, I'm aware that it's common to make date errors in templated forms. That one doesn't meet the reasonable-doubt test.

The other bullet points, though... a lot of things about that situation stink to high heaven.

Don't get distracted by the small stuff. If you're wrong about it, bad actors will claim that that's proof that everything you're saying is wrong too.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

You have a valid point.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (15 children)

The questioning about this article is less about whether he did or did not kill himself but more so whether the date error is evidence he didn’t kill himself

Even if we were 100% sure he was murdered, why would some lowly typist know about it in advance and pre write a report. Like obviously the admin is incompetent and left so many glaring holes but why would they tell a non essential person?

At the end of the day it’s basically impossible that he actually killed himself of his own volition but to say that a date error is proof of that is incredibly flimsy

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

time zone thing

really? what time zones did JEE fly across in his prison cell?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was going to post the same thing. I cannot tell you the number of times I've misdated a document because I used a previous document as a template and forgot to check the date.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

am i the only person who had the foresight to make blank templates? that autofilled the dates?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would say "you'd be surprised" but you evidently are also a corpo or ex corpo, so... no, you wouldn't be.

Yeah, most of your (ex)coworkers are in fact devious, petty, self-centered idiots.

Yep.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ex and ancillary, but yeah.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Well uh, as per my last email:

... sorry, lol.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The they also changed the cause of death after they found Epstein in his cell

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lmaooo as if anyone really doubted that he was killed... I mean come on people.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The only thing that makes me hesitate on that one is.. Trump or the Clinton's or whoever could have had him assassinated in prison, I don't believe they would have gone through the added effort of keeping him alive. He's gonna have a hard time sourcing kids now so why bother? Certainly not because any of the list of suspects values friendship or loyalty

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Trump or the Clinton’s or whoever could have had him assassinated in prison

I'll never understand the theory that Hillary Clinton - a woman who hadn't held political office in over three years, had nothing personally to lose by Epstein yapping, and had no material contacts in the current federal government - managed to get this job done.

But Trump, the sitting President, with an upcoming reelection fight where he was underwater in the polls and surrounded by Epstein associates, was the guy who stood beyond repute.

Given the number of people Epstein touched, and the rank incompetency of both Trump and Clinton, I'd sooner put my money down on Thiel or Gates or even Prince Andrew as the mastermind. But dropping Clinton and Trump into the same lineup? Come on. One of them definitely had a bit more leverage with the fucking NY Prison Bureau.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago

only the right wing msm was framing that way, so rebuplicans believe it. even his multiple assasination attempts were more than likely staged. its also a very PUTIN-LIKE MOVE, he stages false flags all the time to gian legitimacy, or a distraciton.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Bill barr you fucking idiot. 😂

[–] OldGrayDog@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Assuming he is actually dead.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›