this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
259 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28130 readers
2035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm still convinced that Gamergate was a trial run to see if open misogyny could win widespread support in the west and be used to indoctrinate young men into far-right ideology.

It worked.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was there

Gamer gate started out as literally gamers being pissed about fraudulent game reviews before it got overrun by right wing assholes

I guess it was similar to occupy Wall Street that got overrun by leftist extremists that started adding so much other crap on top of the basic message that was intended that nothing happened except rich coked up banket laughing at them from a balcony

But yeah, gamergate was not organized with that intent, the actual initial intent was to get honest game reviews

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was there

So was I.

Maybe they seized on one dude being pissed at his ex and making some accusations as a catalyst, and I'm certain well meaning folks got caught up in something they weren't fully aware of, but that's sort of the point with this kind of op. No one approaches you online and says "do you want to attack feminist game developers and entertainment journalists as the opening salvo in a culture was that will install fascism in the west?"

Even if it was co-opted, it was co-opted very early on and that doesn't change what it was for most of its miserable time as part of the public consciousness or the damage it did.

The entire right wing, despite being the party of “personal responsibility”, despises accountability and oversight. From body cams on police to the IRS to voting system transparency.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The only thing men have ever protected in regards to women and children is eachother from accountability. Strange how almost every woman you know has been SAed but almost no men you know have been convicted. It’s almost like the system is working as intended

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What accountability? They have no reason to be afraid.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 days ago

They were afraid it would create accountability. So they fought to prevent that.

[–] choui4@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

I, for one, am shocked!

[–] breakfastmtn@piefed.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Well shit, that was a absolute banger of an article. Thanks for posting it!

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whats up with all the weird spelling in that article? The = signs in place of letters are very prominent.

Is it some sort of anti-ai thing they're trying?

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That's from the Epstein Files. The way they were pulled from the emails messed up the formatting so half the emails in the Epstein files have weird random equals signs.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This sounds more like a technical problem on your end.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

Did you not even read the article you shared?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Ar= you sur=?