this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
288 points (95.3% liked)

Today I Learned

27892 readers
447 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m sorry but if you’re drilling and selling massive amounts of oil I don’t care how many electric cars you drive. All that oil’s on you.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That raises a question... What creates the emissions, the selling or the burning?

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

Definitely burning. It is possible to make reusable plastics out of oil, e.g.

Of course, plastics might have their own problems, but they aren't always CO2 emissions.

It seems unlikely we'll be able to completely eliminate plastics (current medical practices is the sticking point I see), tho we can certainly make a more "circular economy" around them, to reduce the need for oil extraction.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it the casino's fault the gamblers have such an easy time ruining their life and reaching bankruptcy? Is it the fault of the celebrity for making such an enticing commercial and being in partnership with the casinos?

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Regulation is better than prohibition, it seems like sometimes if you cut off supply, demand means the supplier changes (eg. vapes, gambling)… whereas some things are easily replaced, there’re viable/easier alternatives (eg. coal, types of betting). What is deemed “personal responsibility” in one locale is exploitative in another; capitalist or predatory? It’s not easy

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, regulation is better than prohibition, but it seems highly unregulated nowadays.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

The oil is sold because there is demand

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And how much oil did they sell?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago

At least 1.

[–] Steve@communick.news 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Isn't this just news, rather than TIL?
Maybe I'm wrong

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Every piece of news is something new I learned today.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

reddit.com/r/til has a 3 year minimum, i don't think this community has that rule

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 19 points 2 days ago

Maybe it should

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 36 points 2 days ago

This isn't a TIL; it's news.

WOW, AWESOME! I bet they do the exact opposite The USA does with benefits for truck & other gas powered automobiles.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oil executives are able to get the US government to invade other countries and dismantle functioning public transport, domestic auto sales are a piece of cake.

True, Iraq wars & Venezuela invasion & capture of their leader & his wife.

I was thinking that making gas powered automobiles more expensive own-use would only make it so The Rich-Super Rich Economic Classes/Owners are the only ones to own-use gas powered automobiles. So it would the best just to outright ban gas & gas powered automobiles from being sold in the countries & brought into the countries.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We used to do EV and Solar rebates, until the leadbrained voters decided they wanted more lead apparently

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Please tell me they didn't buy Teslas.

Edit: also "98 diesel cars were registered" which are worse than petrol cars. Still very low numbers.

Most misleading headline ever, wow

[–] TheMainIngredient@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow....

How are petrol sales and what the infrastructure look like now? Is there much change there yet?

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There's still tons of petrol cars. This is obviously just new cars. Not cars in general

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some gas stations, mostly ones without the store, are closing in saturated areas but most are still there just with charging stations in the lot next to the pumps.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Good god. Imagine not wanting to buy an ICE because you're annoyed how hard it would be to find a place to get patrol.

This is the future.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

WOW, that's truly amazing. That rate keeps up for long enough, they'll replace almost everything for electric.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's what happens when you make it cheaper. Everyone else has dropped subsidies.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't even need to subsidies electric. You just need to tax all carbon and pollution at the actual cost to society.

The only reason petrol is preferred elsewhere is due to the lack of infrastructure. You can get petrol/gas everywhere. Charging your car is less reliable and needs effort to find. While it's not really a problem for most people's driving habits day to day, it's a perceived problem.

As energy prices continue to rise and solar continues to drop, it will become more and more economical to have electric car and solar charging.

It is not just lack of enough infrastructure, but it is more foundational so that The Rich-Super Rich Economic Classes/Owners have members who own oil & gas monopolizing companies.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what subsidies the oil and gas but it's the external expenses to society that are the biggest subsidy. That's what carbon taxes or carbon trading schemes are designed to address. This, the true cost makes oil and gas uneconomical compared to green energy.

It's like Walmart underpaying their workers, so they are entitled to food aid. The tru cost of living is not reflected in their wages. We all end up subsidizing the company instead of them paying their fair share.

Carbon trading schemes are just scams, to avoid paying what they owe.

Other than that we agree on the rest.

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

We've been at it for decades and keep going, even if the benefits are being cut back, as the price of petrol keeps rising through taxes.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I was optimistic for a while that we could be dragged kicking and screaming into the future, and the scary part is that musk made it possible. At this point I don’t expect that news from the us in my lifetime