this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
153 points (96.9% liked)

politics

29363 readers
1792 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago (6 children)

NOT ONE PERSON has paid any consequences[*], just why in the fuck would anyone "move on" from the most notorious pedo ring in history?

[*] Oh, okay, one woman is in prison. No one else, even though we have all these names of men.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One woman is in a minimum security prison with work release.

[–] normanwall@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

She got moved there from a more secure prison after a confidential meeting with the guy who is the presidents former personal lawyer IIRC

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago

Yet Donald raped children?

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey, that prince got mean looks from his family. That has to count for something right?

[–] adb@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He had to relinquish his title! The horror! Have you no sympathy?

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I didn't know! What horror! It's a shame that cruel and unusual punishment must be legal there!

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hang on, after this latest tranche of photos, he's going to have to move into a 5 bedroom house! That's barely enough for him, his 2 daughters, and his ex-wife who took those daughters to Epstein's house when they were children and he had recently been released from prison for fucking children, should they want to stay. That's only like one bedroom for the help...

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

Because one of the biggest Epstein-collaboraters says so of course.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well, across the pond, a Lord has been unlorded, and a prince has been disemprinced. Or whatever you call it.

Edit: still across the pond, Starmer's scheming right-wing chief of staff has now also fucked off.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Its annoying that in the press briefings that journalists never ask the obvious questions of:

"so if there is not enough evidence to charge others then why aren't investigations being started into those who have been named? "

"Is the DOJ no longer willing to investigate credible reports of pedophilia?"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I honestly wish they would frame things by asking why they are so quick to go after the likes of Don Lemon or Adam Schiff or quickly name a victim of ICE thuggery who is now dead as being an "insurrectionist", and YET, they seem so hesitant to go after credible reports of pedophiles.

Why this huge disparity in leaping to judgement and action in these other cases, but this endless stonewalling on pedophiles?

I had to laugh when I saw James Bowman The Couch Banger saying that Donvict was correct in telling a female reporter to smile more because journalism is so adversarial. LOL, they are throwing softballs nearly all of the time. Even Kaitlan's question was rather mild, to be honest.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

"What are the DOJ's criteria for deciding which pedophiles to protect?"

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But lots and LOTS of people are resigning their jobs around the world. The last one will be the, uh, cherry on top.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there a list? I know I saw at least one headline of one of these perps resigning.

When do they go to prison?

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

LOL well CharlesDarwin, you know, they're too evolved for prison ... they just go hide somewhere until everyone forgets...

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Anyone remember Qanon and their obsession with a network of wealthy elites, trafficking kids for sex and who knows what else?

Yeah. Anyone heard from them lately? I would have thought they'd have more to say on this.

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anyone remember Qanon and their obsession with a network of wealthy elites, trafficking kids for sex and who knows what else?

Yeah. Anyone heard from them lately? I would have thought they'd have more to say on this.

It’s because most are wearing masks working for ICE.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Well yeah, we have to stop these immigrants from raping kids. Duh

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

They are all Homer sinking into the hedge now.

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Moot's name was in the files. Even he met Epstein.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They're still proving mathematically how the 2020 election was definitely stolen.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

The weird thing is that they were actually.righy! It's just that, you know, wrong political party

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

Turns out it was jealousy

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes I’ll bet the child rapist wants us all to move on.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

He also murders and eats them.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago
[–] Janx@piefed.social 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The guy who's mentioned the most times in the illegally-censored Epstein files thinks we should just let these child rapists live their lives!? Come. The. Fuck. On.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Lol the amount of times he's mentioned means these are the Trump files.

I'd really like to see how many times Epstein's name comes up, because it has to be close or less. 38k is fucking insane. How many is it without redactions?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Also, Dementia Donnie says that Kaitlan Collins should smile more.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

The only people that want to move on from the Epstein files are those that are in the Epstein files. Literally everyone else is ready to see consequences.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 12 points 2 months ago
[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago

I will not move on until Donald Trump gets the Mussolini treatment. 

We will move on once the files are released, and the guilty are punished... all of them.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's like if you had the 9/11 pilots saying to just move on

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's kinda what happened. If there is a country that had anything to do with it, it's Saudi Arabia, yet the US invaded Afghanistan and called it a day.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

iraq would like a word

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

The Taliban were hosting Al-Qaida, so there was some reason, if not to invade, then at least to make some incursions. Iraq, on the other hand, was one of the most resolute enemies of Al-Qaida. It turns out that secular totalitarians don't like religious reactionary totalitarians. But Halliburton wanted all those contracts to rebuild the Iraqi oil industry after it had been bombed.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

The fuck do mean not easy? A judge literally gave them a deadline to release this shit already. They're literally breaking the law.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

The more I read about it the more I think we should NOT move on, I thought it was just some crazy sex island and now it looks like he was basically controlling the world over there wtf.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago
[–] grumpo_potamus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Nah, I don't think I will.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

America should move on from MAGA

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

America will. Once justice has been served.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can't put america and justice in the same sentence, it's just not right

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

We'll see about that. It's not over yet.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

"May not be that easy"? As if we should comply with what Trump wants? What the fuck is wrong with the BBC? I mean, besides the fact that its management ranks are still stacked with Conservatives appointed during the 14 years of Tory misgovernment.