this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
386 points (98.2% liked)

politics

27817 readers
3319 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The question has been framed in the streets: is a government that impoverishes healthcare and nutrition, flouts the law, enriches its officials, imprisons babies, and kills its citizens worth the money it collects, much less the respect and obedience it demands?

Democrats have nothing to lose by shutting down the government to force the majority party to respond to these questions and the one that looms over all: what, if any, is the political and moral future of the US?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This traitor isn’t coming to save us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 4 days ago (10 children)
  1. Shut down the US government.
  2. Each state puts forth a new constitution elevating themselves to country status.
  3. Form a new North American Union (like the EU) with Canada as Daddy
  4. ???
  5. Profit
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 7 points 4 days ago

2 would mostly only happen in red states. The rest mostly know how to cooperate.

And you know that California doesn't need Canada, even less when you consider the rest of the US west coast in with it.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Some states have proven that, without federal intervention, they cannot effectively govern themselves. Texas, for instance…

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Texas would last long enough to be dangerous to it's neighbors. I would not want to be in New Mexico if federal power breaks down.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Probably better to form an analogy to the old European Coal and Steel Community rather than to jump directly into an EU equivalent, also bring Mexico in since without the US being a thing they'll end up with the largest population on the continent.

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not smart politics, but I figured it'd be more complicated than a meme outline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ferretfacefrankburns@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Canada doesn't want to babysit you guys. Seriously, every time a yankee doodle dipshit proposes Canada to take over some US states, it just sounds like immature fuckups who don't want to take responsibility for yourself and move out of your parent's basement.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

You make some good points. Whats it going to take to close this deal though? I feel like you guys have a whole lot of negotiating power here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Each state puts forth a new constitution elevating themselves to country status.

I hope my state can successfully wage war against every state to the south of it.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

My state is completely surrounded by enemies.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Isnt that like kicking meth addicted people over? seems cruel?

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

While my theory is based on various sci-fi so should be taken with a mine of salt, my guess is that USA will split into three different countries: NUSA (lol Cyberpunk) which will comprise of the original 13 colony states and the upper North East, The California Republic which will essentially be the West and NW and in good relations with NUSA but with different legislature, and the South which might be called anything from Texas, New Texas, Republic of Texas, or New Louisiana Territory, which will essentially be a war-torn area full of religious extremists not unlike Middle-Eastern areas after the West had their way with them. It will be full of forever wars by religious factions funded by the MIC shareholders of various other countries but in the public face it'll be covered by the media as religious extremism and/or patriotic fanaticism while ignoring the material reality and history of the situation.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The south could bring slavery and cousin/sister shagging back like they have always wanted. I say let them have their theocracy. We build a wall around the enture south and make it into a reality tv show for the world. and, profit.

When season 45 ends we can then just give whatever rubble is left to cuba to figure out.

[–] TwodogsFighting 2 points 3 days ago

That's just the plot from escape from new York.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

And Mexico as Madre?

Claudia Sheinbaum is pretty cute. I'm in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

If you don't feel like your representatives are adequately representing you (God knows I don't), this is a good time to find a primary candidate to support (monetarily or with your time) - or even file to run yourself. Every house representative is up for reelection in November.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

HFC - High-Frequency Caving

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

Shut it the fuck down until the weasels in the GOP actually have their arm twisted to engage with empathy. I'd be personally affected by a shutdown, but it's a sacrifice I'd make for a long time if it means any kind of progress against the fucking fascist pedophile protectors in office.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The Democrats faux concerned the air traffic controllers not working and not being paid, to kowtow to the Republicans in the last shutdown. The Dems had its members "break rank" who happened to be politicians, whose election won't be coming soon or are retiring. The Democrats will pull the same manipulative tactics. They won't be in this game for so long if they are not that devious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Didn't Schumer already cave? Or did I misread a headline?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

IIRC, he's starting negotiations in the middle and is eager to give up even more.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Man, I wish Democrats were the heartless, scheming, cut-throat, socialist maniacs that I was told they were growing up in a Republican household...

The country would be in much better shape if it were true...

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Here's the thing, they are, possibly even better than republicans, they're taking the same corporate pro israel bribe money, they just didn't also align themselves with the insane neo Nazis, Christian terrorists, and loudmouth idiots.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You forgot the part where I said "socialist." I don't want them to be heartless and scheming if they're not doing it for socialist reforms.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

You are correct, I did in fact miss that. Shouldn't be trying to be thoughtful while I'm in bed trying to sleep 😅

And hell yeah, the only reform is socialist reform. It's unfortunate that the party is almost all corpo Dems, definitely needs more push from the left

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No taxation without representation. We know Trump/ Elon / Putin hacked the election. This is NOT the will of the American people. Cut them off of our tax dollars. They want small government so bad, see what they can do without revenue from blue cities/ states.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Everywhere could be better off without a government, not just the US.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

No, we don't live in fantasy land. That could only work on a very small scale and even then, there are political leaders.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

My pet rock can run things better than Trump is doing.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 3 points 4 days ago

Propaganda from “liberal” media trying to calm you down. Fight.

load more comments
view more: next ›