this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
188 points (97.5% liked)

News

36943 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

United States President Donald Trump has suggested that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is investigating the wealth of Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar as his administration grapples with the fallout from the killing of demonstrator Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

The Republican president also said on Monday that he is sending his border czar, Tom Homan, to the state of Minnesota, which has been witnessing protests since federal immigration officers fatally shot Pretti, a 37-year-old nurse, there on Saturday morning.

“Additionally, the DOJ and Congress are looking at ‘Congresswoman’ Illhan Omar, who left Somalia with NOTHING, and is now reportedly worth more than 44 Million Dollars. Time will tell all.”

Omar’s net worth has increased into the millions of dollars in recent years due to her husband’s wealth. Omar serves in the US House of Representatives, representing Minnesota.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Trump thinks everybody is dirty, and can be scared by an "investigation".

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 80 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Every accusation is an admission.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Projection. Republicans ought to run a movie theater.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They'd burn through the fucking screens.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Republicans are running a movie theater. Except they run it like a ~~Boulder~~ Aurora Colorado movie theater showing The Dark Knight Rises.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Well we know the buying a property and claiming it as your primary residence was. As she showed the application for the loan to a source right after being accused of it. And then another news company followed up on it and showed Trump filed applications to buy two properties in Florida claiming they were going to be his primary residence.... While simultaneously claiming his primary residence was elsewhere. (I think Mar-A-Lago, but can't remember)

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everyone except himself, of course. Every single investigation into him has been a "witch hunt"!

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Didn't he even make a task force called the Office of the Weaponization of Government?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago

My first rule of life: People are most suspicious of their own behavior. Cheaters think every one is cheating on them, thieves think everyone is stealing from them. If someone baselessly accuses you of something, they're most likely doing it themselves.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That’s how mafia states like Russia work.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

When the investigators are ideologically committed to punishing political opponents for any perceived slights, one doesn't have to be guilty of anything to be worried about being investigated...

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Corrupt people think everyone has to be corrupt, liars think everyone has to be a liar, so on and so forth…

I guess Trump made this specific accusation because he saw the headlines about him making at least $1.4 billion in his first year back in office, and felt he needed to poison the well.

I know the DOJ has no credibility anymore, but god, imagine a world where they did their job and investigated the $400 million jet, the hundreds of millions of untraceable crypto and meme coins he's started that foreign actors could use anonymously in violation of FECA and Constitutional emoluments restrictions, the "Board of Peace" donation fund controlled by Trump personally...

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Doesn't she have a rich husband and got married?

She has already submitted her tax returns, unlike a certain someone who promised them a decade ago.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

"we're investigating the 400th richest member of the house"

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I'd actually support this if it wasn't obvious retribution. We should constantly be closely watching how all elected officials are making money.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I appreciate your sentiment, but Ilhan Omar's "sudden wealth" is entirely attributable to her marrying a wealthy guy. That's it, that explains it all. She married well. The right is only making a stink out of it because their camp is full of people too stupid and hateful for the truth to matter.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if everything was completely above board, there should be nothing left for the public to find out about their representatives' finances. If they don't want scrutiny, don't run for office.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

If he really cared about this, he'd go after Schmuck Schumer's fortune. But then again, Schumer is one of his most useful assets in the Senate, he doesn't want Schmuck to go anywhere.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

I wouldn't mind this if it affected everyone equally.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 16 points 2 months ago

And Donny is still a very good mate of the pedophile Epstein.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well he needs people to be looking literally anywhere other than at him right?

•"What's with the obsession over the nothing burger Epstein files? I'm looking into corruption thanks to DOGE!"

•"What's with the obsession over DOGE? I'm bullying the president of Ukraine with V.P. Permaliner because we hate Ukraine and love Putin, right America?

•What's with the obsession over Ukraine? I'm cracking down on immigration with quotas!"

•"What's with the obsession over quotas? There are no quotas! Also don't worry about those JP Morgan bank records of transaction between Epstein and Peter Thiel. Have some compassion, my dear friend Charlie Kirk was just publicly assassinated within hours of the Senate finance committee bringing up those records. It's totally not weird."

"To honor him as a martyr for free speech, I will be cracking down on free speech. I officially declare anyone on the left who refuses to pretend he was the second coming of Jesus, an official terrorist. Also heads up because I need to pretend I don't know Netenyahu is about to kill a bunch of scientists in Iran with Palantir drones, and then I'll also bomb Iran for some reason, and help defend murder of civilians in Gaza who are seeking food at the aid stations I set up for them with Netenyahu's permission."

•"What's with the obsession over free speech, Israel, and the people who definitely aren't starving in Gaza? I'm sending the national guard to invade U.S. cities and show I'm tough on crime!"

•"What's with the obsession over the national guard and CIA trained child soldiers? I'm invading Greenland!"

•"What's with the obsession over Greenland? I'm sanctioning the murder of a U.S. citizen for free speech! And yes. I will be doubling down on it being their fault for thinking they have first amendment rights! Didn't you see the literal memo? It's called NSPM-7. That soccer mom was a terrorist!"

•"What's with the obsession over government sanctioned murder of U.S. citizens for first amendment rights? I'm threatening Iran because of how many civilians the Iranian government has murdered over free speech. Could be a lot worse over here, just saying"... "Anyway, I'm also sanctioning the murder of another U.S. citizen! And yes. I will be doubling down on it being their fault for thinking they have second amendment rights! You got a problem with it? Because we can just go down the line in order one by one. Their rights don't count!"

•"What's with the obsession over government sanctioned murder of U.S. citizens for second amendment rights? I'm looking into a 'lady congressman's' wealth bc she's a Muslim from Minnesota and she said some very hurtful things about me."

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

look at yourself, ya big dumb prick

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

Every accusation is an admission.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago

She can just say her taxes are under audit and will be released in 2 weeks. Rinse and repeat. That's how this works, right?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How DARE she NOT be a BILLIONAIRE!

-Republicans?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

More like "How dare a minority woman have any semblance of wealth. That's a man's job!" while not understanding she married a rich guy.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

This from the most corrupt politician in US history... get fucking real.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Five bucks it’s just progressive PAC money and Small dollar donations as far as political contributions are concerned (which surprise Donald is totally legal or are you advocating that we get money out of politics and have a campaign system that is publicly run and financed.)

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Omar's husband owes a few business, that's where the money comes from. Trump may be confused because those businesses are profitable, and not just a front for money laundering like most Trump ventures.