this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27463 readers
2954 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump never gave a shit about the gun lobby. They're just useful idiots to him.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's true about everyone.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Teh ironies! It burns!

[–] Human@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The government out spends the public. Dont expect gun lobbies to side with the people - they know where their bread is buttered.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In specifically small arms, I'm not so sure. I'd bet that the American public buys enough firearms every year to arm every American soldier two or three times over. Ruger and PSA aren't competing with Raytheon and L3Harris.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Americans buy a shit ton of guns every year. In just one day 200,000 background checks were submitted. If that’s at least one firearm per check (which I think you can put 4-8 per check) which is enough to arm the marine core.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/11/25/black-friday-posts-new-single-day-record-gun-checks-more-than-200-000/894706001/

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that’s at least one firearm per check (which I think you can put 4-8 per check) which is enough to arm the marine core.

Most military members don't even have a gun...

I shot like 3 shotgun shells and maybe 5 rounds out of a Beretta at boot camp, and didn't touch another gun in uniform for four years.

I even did a few months as security at a pretty secure base, they didn't even give me a whistle. Just told me to scream and duck so the people trained to use guns would use them.

I think that reality gets lost when people talk about how large the US military is.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right. I guess I should have clarified that it works be enough for each service member to be issued at least one firearm at the same time. From what I’ve gathered everything is shared, and those deployed overseas supplied their own magazines in some cases.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It all depends.

Infantry in a war zone have their own gun and it's their gun, with them 24/7.

Armed guards doing patrols with a rifle or sitting at a desk with a handgun likely just got handed one off a rack they turn in at the end of watch.

If you want to know why US troops (specifically Marines) have to buy their own accessories, Alexander Skarsgard explains it waaaay better than I can:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlZZnZG0cyI

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, "gun lobby" isn't the same as "military industrial complex"...

They have two very different objectives and surprisingly little overlap.

Most of the small arms the military buys, they buy so much it eats up the whole product line, and is based on contracts that go decades between reissue.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Mr "take the guns first, deal with due process later" doesn't care about gun rights? Really?!

As others have said, he never cared about them. And the signs were there to see. But too many people chose to ignore those signs out of convenience.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump makes an enemy of everyone sooner or later.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Mostly sooner. I can't believe people think they will be the lucky one that doesn't get shafted, but hope springs eternal and all that?!

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He doesn't care who he makes an enemy of anymore.

He's accountable to nobody.

Let's stop pretending these stories of people "turning on Trump" mean ANYTHING for actual policy or activity going forward.

The first time anything MIGHT have any impact is after the midterm elections, and that comes with such a laundry list of qualifications...

It will require people willing to stop Trump to win those elections, but that's just step ONE, and that's the EASY step. Next, it will require democrats to be willing to grow a pair and stand for at LEAST one principle, it will require the executive branch to not simply IGNORE any directives or legislation (which they are ALREADY doing - talk to me when the Epstein files are released as required by law), and it will require the Supreme Court to not invent batshit reasons to neuter congressional power.

We are not at a turning point. Things will not get better until they get far, far worse.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Hates gun lobby, hates veterans, hates reasonable people. Nothing matters.