this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
84 points (92.0% liked)

Fuck AI

5316 readers
877 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If by "poll", you mean advertisement for their search engine, then yes. Yes, they are.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

They know we hate AI, yet the AI search is opt-out. Weird.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I gotta wonder how many more times this is going to get posted.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

I assume the answer is “yes”

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ehh your picture says Yes = 7% No = 93% lol

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The "noai" image search is returning some AI images.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Are you saying your image search on ddg with noai. price still finds ai generated images? That isn't what the "noai" is meant for, unless I'm misunderstanding you.

It's meant to tell ddg to not put your question or search through an ai that attempts to answer it, like Google and all others are doing now by default, at the top of the page. It can't magically tell if an image that matches your search was made by ai or not, of especially not without using ai for this (ironically).

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

nope they claim to remove AI results in search. it actually does remove some large ai content farms ime

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair it's an extraordinarily difficult game of whack-a-mole.

You want no more AI? Excellent we haven't agreed upon goal, now the problem is that new websites that crank out slop are constantly popping up to proliferate the internet with it. Oh and the slop is getting harder to differentiate as the technology improves because I'm going to be real I've seen some images that I was told by a third party were AI and I just couldn't tell anymore, and sometimes it doesn't come from one of these dedicated slop farm sites.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

true, it seems impossible to block tbh. right now some blocklists kinda work, but i don't think it will last for long.

[–] jax@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It actually does say "We've Removed AI‑Generated Images" on the landing page of noai.duckduckgo.com

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

It’s damn near impossible to know an image is ai generated unless the metadata clearly states it, or it comes from a known generation domain.

A human may (or may think they can) be able to determine if something is AI, but it would be impossible to detect everything, even if they went so far as to train an algorithm to do so… which would kinda defeat the purpose.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

If that's the case, then I misunderstood the point of the noai image search.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol. How is this “poll” not going to be overridden by industry bots?

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago

93% voted no. 4% is the lizardman constant so that leaves 3% done by industry bots.

[–] thesdev@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago