this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14325 readers
605 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net
Thordros@hexbear.net
14
I see the USN is trying to defeat the PLAN by making them all die of laughter. Surly 16 missiles and 2 pop guns should be good enough for surface combat. (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://xcancel.com/i/status/2011880808395784477

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

I think your link is broken.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

xcancel, not cancelx

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Downgrading lol

The Perry frigates had a 76mm gun. Replacing the CIWS with RAM is an interesting choice. RAM is more effective (except within the final mile or so), but has extremely limited usage. 21 cell launcher, with 2-5 missiles per intercept with incredibly limited ability to reload at sea, and no magazine (aside from the launcher itself). Compare that to CIWS which has ammunition for 1-2 intercepts, but between ready storage and magazines you’ve got ammunition for dozens of intercepts.

I still don’t think the US navy knows what it wants its ships to do.