Yes.

We have so much technology and innovation and a line of millions of people with ideas who want to make games.

Yet we spend our billions in the video game industry to zhuzh up ps2 games made by a studio of 35 people including support and sales.

Why? Because it’s slightly easier to market, despite again the billions available to spend making new and exciting games.

Yes. Especially when it’s only like 2 or 3 years after first release. It’s just double dipping at that point.

Yes. It's like "let's not pursue new ideas, it's too risky. Let's repeat what worked once" - like in the movie industry as well. It's boring and uninspired.

Remakes: Yes Remasters: No

I don't like when they remake a game I loved but they add a bunch to it like new gameplay mechanics, or make changes to stories or characters. That being said not all remakes are bad, probably most are just fine, but really not my cup of tea.

I greatly prefer a straight remaster. Just update the graphics, remaster the sound, maybe add a little more details to the game world, and I'm a happy dude.

For older games that are difficult to install or run by modern means., I think remakes and remasters are completely justified. Upgrades for older games to support newer technologies is nice, but something like TLoU Part 1 getting two remasters on a platform that has no issue running the first remaster already seems more exploitative and a waste of resources than conservational. If it sells like hotcakes, though, who am I to judge?

Nah, there's just not enough of actual old titles that could do with a remake or remaster.

half of all remakes are worse than their originals. all we need are modern ports of older games so i don't have to emulate

Until I get my Legend Of Dragoon remake, there aren't too many, no. After that ya'll can do what you want

TLoU2 didn't need remastering. At least not this soon!

Yes but I'll still take a Tiberian Sun and Red Alert 2 remake.

I hope remasters continue for games that are from the era where they relied on specific OS library hacks to get the game running. Those games are hard to run on modern OSs.

I'd argue that video games need remakes and remasters far more than movies do. Video game technologies change a lot in 10-15 years, so a remake/remaster is an opportunity to improve controls and fix issues with running the game on hardware that hadn't been concieved at the time of the game's release. Plenty of old games have severe bugs, outdated controls or general issues with newer hardware (can't handle widescreen monitors, buttons don't scale for high resolutions, etc.) which can make replaying them a pain.

You sit down to watch a 25 year old movie and it's pretty easy to watch, but you sit down to play a 25 year old game and it's going to vary wildly if you can even get it to run in the first place, let alone if it'll run well

I don't like remasters, especially those which are usually just re-release with hi-res textures. They are charging like $30 and above for hi-res texture, and some of them has unstable framerates. At certain point of time, using emulator yields better graphics & performance than some of those remasters, especially for PS1/PS2 games.

On the other hand, I actually like remakes way more.

Remake not only exploits that nostalgia, but also tend to make game plays better with added QoL functions, sometimes with new gameplay mechanics. Some of the remakes that I really like:

• Yakuza 1+2 Kiwami
• Crisis Core
• Tony Hawk's Pro Skater
• Resident Evil 1+2 (have not played 3+4 remakes yet)
• Live a Live
• Mass Effect Trilogy (thankfully it's not just a hi-res port)

Remake is great when there's a significant technology and time gaps between the games, which is why TLOU remakes drew some ires.

Yes. One hundred percent yes without exception- YES.

@chloyster we can't get a remake of KOTOR but somehow we are getting this piece of crap on THE EXACT SAME SYSTEM it was released on.

I feel publishers are doing small stabs at originals while doing full milk-yo-wallet efforts with remakes/remasters. Pretty conservative approach, imo.

I'm reminded of AlphaDream, which died as a company shortly after releasing a remake of a game where the original was still playable on the same console.

I just wish the games that are remade/remastered are basically just graphic updates, with some bug fixes and minor qol additions. That's it. Not like what they did to ff7.

Hell, diablo 2 Remaster was good. The addition of being able to swap between new and old graphics on the fly is amazing tbh.

My only problem with the remakes and remasters is that they keep censoring shit that wasn't even controversial or offensive in the first place.

Heck, with patches these days, you don't even have to wait for the remaster for censorship CoughSkullGirlsSuperHotVRcough

The only remakes that were worth it are the RE:makes

Yes, if it meant that Sony made PlayStation exclusive games available on PC immediately, rather than upon remastering.

No if it meant I'd just never get to play any of thos games.

Ok is this eurogamer cookie request a fucking joke? They care about privacy and they will share information with their 756 partners?

No

Yes. Just move on and make new games worth playing, instead of rehashing the past. And more often than not, fucking it up in the process. Only our modern society would accept and accommodate a remade game that's 100% worse than the original.

Plenty of new stuff is still coming out so I can see no reason to be upset about remakes and remasters.

Yes

I’m fine with remasters that allow us to play old games on modern hardware. I’m somewhat ok with remakes to an extent. I’m not ok with the constant remakes of games that aren’t old enough to need a remake or the original game still holds up. Most recent remakes aren’t needed and feel like cash grabs