this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
53 points (94.9% liked)

Privacy

44437 readers
495 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Water Purifier, Ceiling Fan, Washing machine Dish Washer Fridge

How do I disable them ?

It can be turned against us -

Location Beacon Wire+Speaker - Audio Spying Customer Tracking Killing a product early to increase sales Selling Customer Habits Radiation

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] artyom@piefed.social 56 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lots of reasons. But primarily to force you to download an app that hoovers up your data, sells it to advertisers, and serves you ads at the same time, all while holding your expensive appliances hostage behind a monthly subscription that they can raise at any time. So, primarily, to fuck you.

[–] tdTrX@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Original question is what are all the possibilities It can be turned against us ?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

I don't understand. I think you have a spelling or grammar error in there but not sure where.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Do you mean hijacking? If so, any IOT device controlled via a webservice is very susceptible to lackluster security at the manufacturer level. If anyone is within signal range of your device, they can also hija it.

Do you mean being harmed in any way by the manufacturer? They are using the devices to collect and sell any and all possible data they can collect about you.

[–] Greenbeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

because they want your data

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Honestly I don't mind that, at all. What I mind is if it's mandatory and only through proprietary applications.

WiFi, BT, Zigbee, Z-wave etc are not per se a problem. The question instead is who practically owns the device. If the behavior is force on you as a customer, then it's easy, it's not YOUR device. Consider then buying OSHW or whatever alternative you need, including potentially non connected devices that you yourself connect on your terms.

Edit: check which devices are compatible with GadgetBridge and/or HomeAssistant then reviews from actual customers. That should help you find out which devices can match your requirements.

[–] FrostyTrichs@crazypeople.online 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

@tdTrX@lemmy.ml your account is (accidentally?) flagged as a bot so your posts won't be seen by anyone who has disabled bot posts. You might want to check your account settings.

[–] justmorg000@feddit.online 4 points 5 days ago

Simple, get an engineering degree and disable them. Alternatively, you could refuse to buy devices with those features. If you can't find new ones that exclude those features, maybe buying used devices is your best move.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

in addition to what folks said: also to show you ads.

[–] helloworld@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I prefer cables over Bluetooth and wifi:

  • Ethernet over WiFi
  • USB cable over Bluetooth
  • cabled headphone over Bluetooth headphone

While this increases convenience this also introduces new attack vectors (denial of service by jamming for example, tracking, or impersonation and mtm attacks).

Every person who uses wireless devices constantly emits signals into space. These can be obviously monitored, according to the laws of physics the inverse square law limits the range of such detection capabilities. Also depends on the electromagnetic noise in your environment: Jammers/other people.

  • Geolocation with wifi environment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_jammer

[–] jtzl@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

Why? Cuz companies mistakenly think stalking customers is savvy business.

I've heard that new apppliances, etc will have 5g built in to circumvent you when you don't connect it to your WiFi. So if they then have a microphone installed it'll still upload that data without your permission.

Bot account

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can still buy all of those without any "smart" capabilities easily.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Still, that's a keyword.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Just... don't connect them to the internet? Or if you must connect them for dumb shit like system updates, put them behind some access control where the only access they have is the server they get updates from.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Just… don’t connect them to the internet? Or if you must connect them for dumb shit like system updates, put them behind some access control where the only access they have is the server they get updates from.

I regret to inform you that preventing devices from getting online is getting more difficult: three years ago Amazon began allowing other companies' products to use their BLE-and-LoRa-based mesh network to get online via your neighbors' internet-connected devices.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

FFS. Gonna have to wrap the washing machine in silver foil and get in the neighbours to pour water on their router! Joking.

[–] Baaron87@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Would be easier to create a “guest” network to connect those appliances to and make it a LAN (local area network) only. Can’t phone home. Can’t download updates.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

easier to create a “guest” network to connect those appliances to

I guess you missed my earlier comment in this thread; to reiterate: some devices will now get online via your neighbors' devices even if you don't give them wifi access.

[–] Baaron87@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah, no I saw the comment but missed the part where Amazon is letting other companies use the sidewalk protocol. I’m fortunate enough to have neighbors who don’t use Amazon’s stuff, but if other companies are using their tech it’s a moot point.

I wonder if any of these appliances would stop functioning if the bluetooth and wifi module was suddenly disconnected? Not actually asking, just putting the thought out there. I miss “dumb” products.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

As we saw in this story from a few months ago, yes, absolutely, manufacturers will stoop to the level of disabling devices which are prevented from exfiltrating your data. I'm pretty sure I've heard of TVs doing the same with the network modules but I'm too lazy to search for it now.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

dumb shit like system updates

You can't do that, if you allow that then how can you be sure the next "update" won't make your experience worst? Optional update controlled by the user is great, mandatory ones mean "your" hardware is actually not yours.

For hardware that does insist on connection and even enable mesh networks, it's safer to not buy those.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

I've never used the feature but my toothbrush has Bluetooth for some reason lol