It’s almost as if the priest is suggesting that God wants us uneducated to be better subservient to him, and that seeking knowledge is punishable (by death technically).
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
785 points (98.0% liked)
Comic Strips
21956 readers
2185 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Kinda the point of Satanism.
Monotheistic religion formed in a dialectical relationship with the state. Obedience to God reinforces obedience to the King. No gods no masters is quite literal. Monotheistuc religion is a superstructure created by the material conditions of nascent monarchical statehood that reinforces the conditions that created it.
load more comments
(27 replies)
Tangentially related, but specifically the religious people who are sure that you need religion to know good from evil and act morally genuinely scare me.
They're just admitting they believe noone really tries to do the right thing for the right reasons. You know, like, these are the conventions we set so living in a society can even work. Some are coded in laws. Lots of them are implicitly agreed on.
But no, according to them instead we're supposed to do it for fear of "bad afterlife" or of a spank from sky daddy.
That tells a lot more about what "moral" means to them than anything.
They’re just admitting they believe noone really try to do the right thing for the right reasons. You know, like, these are the conventions we set so living in a society can even work.
Worse, it suggests they have no empathy.
Sure, that too. But empathy is a rather complex matter.
I just can't trust someone who can't see any other reason than "because divine retribution" to treat others well.
"What's stopping you from murdering and raping if you don't have religion?"
"Absolutely nothing. I rape and murder exactly as many people as I want to. The number just happens to be 0. "
I've been saying this for years. If you are "being good" in order to appease a deity or to secure a comfortable afterlife, you aren't a moral person. Goodness should be for its own sake. Do unto others isn't about ensuring better treatment of yourself, its about treating people the way you wish to be treated yourself without the expectation of quid pro quo.
The apple was just sex-ed. They just over-euphemized it to make sure kids could read it, and now everyone gets confused. The apple probably wasn't an apple originally, it was probably a pomegranate, a fruit known for dripping red all over you like blood, and the woman was the one who ate it. So to remove some of the whitewashing of the story, imagine a fully naked Eve with pomegranate juice dripping all over her body, kinda paints a different picture, right?
That's very insightful.
So in other words the pomegranate dripping blood is allegory for her getting her starting her menstrual cycle, hence becoming a woman and being sexualized from now on?
I can see that. I had learned that most of Genesis shouldn't be taken literally anyway. They're mostly allegories or parables.
In text its just a "fruit" specifically the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The need some people have to identify it with a specific fruit is very strange to me.
The bible taken literally is madness. Even new testament. If I were to be religious, I would assume everything is a metaphor.
Gonna come at this from kind of a scholarly angle here... Yes. Yes absolutely.
And just for fun, I'll use the Bible to argue in your favor.
You raise the point that even the New Testament (the half that pivots from "follow these rules" to "don't be a douche") shouldn't be taken literally. Some might argue that that's the only part that should be taken literally, but let's take a look at how Jesus chooses to illustrate that message: by doing miracles and relating parables. He's not regaling crowds with true tales of history, he's telling them made-up stories to convey a point about morals.
Hm... Made-up stories to convey a point about morals...
Stories, perhaps, like someone turning into a pillar of salt because they chose to dwell on the past instead of moving on? Or about the value of perseverance and solidarity in the face of continued adversity? Not giving up hope, even when you've lost everything? How murder is just straight up bad?
Lot's Wife, Moses & the Pharaoh, the entire book of Job, Cain & Abel; all from the Old Testament, and all far less believable than the Good Samaritan... But somehow, those stories are to be taken as truth, while a story about a nice guy existing in Samaria is an allegory for the goodness in all of us? It's all parables, all the way down. The New Testament is just parable-ception - it's a made-up (or at least, very heavily embellished) story about a nice guy who tells stories about nice guys.
All religions are mental illness adjacent.
Depends how literally you take it. Ironically, generally the people who take Genesis the most literally take Jesus saying "this is my body" and "this is my blood" the least literally
Imagine believing the earth is 6000 years old but that transubstantiation is bullshit.
load more comments
(4 replies)
The Bible literally says it should be taken literally.
That's what makes it so funny.
Even the name says "take me literally".
Back in the day, a man would take an oath on his testicles, "I swear on my balls it is true"
Old and New Testament means "Old and New I swear on my balls this is true"
load more comments
(2 replies)
Here’s the thing that doesn’t often get noted with this story - the Serpent tells the truth. God lies. And, again, the Serpent is the bad guy?
Most people won't go beyond the "sepernt = bad" logic ingrained in human brain.
The gnostics figured out an explanation for this 2000 years ago.
According to them, the "God" who created the material world and is talked about in the Old Testament is an evil and/or ignorant lesser deity and that's why the world sucks.
The "real" God rules over the immaterial (souls, knowledge, and the likes) and is called "the Invisible Spirit".
Both the snake and later on Jesus were agents/emanations of this "Invisible Spirit" sent to bring knowledge ("gnosis" in Greek) to humanity in order to help them break free from the prison that is the material world.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it doesn't matter how logical and internally consistent your ideology is, the one who is more organized wins out in the end. This doesn't have anything to do with any currently ongoing political situation. 🫠
You’re awesome. I came here to drop some Gnosis and here you’ve done all the heavy lifting.
Fuck Saklas!
Also, prior to the old testament being in the form it is today, the character that would become the one god was just a minor god within the Canaanite pantheon. A lot of the old testament makes more sense when read with that context.
Yep, Exodus 34:14 : "For thou shalt worship no other god; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God"
This strongly implies that (in this theology) there are multiple gods if Jehovah/Elohim can be jealous.
Squint real hard and take the beginning of Genesis as a tale of solar/planetary formation followed by evolution, closest origin myth I know of.
"Let there be light." Solar ignition. Let's go!
They got the order of life mixed here and there, but at least it started in the sea. Adam and Eve's curse is by far the most interesting bit.
They eat from the Tree of Knowledge. Let's say they were apes before that event and look at the curses laid down.
-
Now we know good from evil. Bit hard to argue animals are terribly moral, having a concept of good and evil. Other mammals are close, especially emotionally, but nothing like humans.
-
Now our heads are swole with brains, painful childbirth follows. Don't know of any mammals that have such painful, risky births.
-
We're cursed to labor all our days to bring food forth from the ground, when before we were swinging from trees, eating fruit and the occasional howler monkey baby. The invention of agriculture anyone?
-
Cast out of the Garden, we can never get any of the above back.
I find it fascinating how many factual points they hit without resorting to, "Big god spooged on mountains and giants came forth and so on and so on." (Yes, I'm aware of how nuts Genesis gets down the road. I've read it a time or two.)
If you really want to confound Christians, point out there's a second creation myth 3 or 4 pages later, which disagrees with the first.
The seven day creation myth usually gets folded with the Adam and Eve myth in most tellings. Christian preachers can get away with it because nobody reads the Bible.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Genesis" is crap, start to finish.
Only in an age of no books could this religion flourish; only the Black Death broke their stranglehold of Europe.
Still tax free! So that's nice.
Only in an age of no books could this religion flourish
I'd like to point out that Greece and Rome were absolutely packed with knowledge and curiosity... until monotheism showed up.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
He's a brave kid to turn his back to a Catholic priest
See I always thought of the apple as being like Pandora's box, to mix theologies. People were innocent and ignorant before it, living very simple, short, worry-free lives. Eve taking the apple is what opened the possibility for humanity to grow and ascribe meaning to our lives, to form societies and create great works, enabling the best of us to make and do so much more for the world but also enabling the worst of us to do far more terrible things. That's the way I always interpreted that tale, as an expansion of humanity's potential and responsibility
I’ve been saying this for years. Satan is the good guy in the Bible.
Whenever I want to get entertained, I tend to read religion Lore. Islam tends to trump it all.
Coincidentally today read this; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aja%27ib_al-Makhluqat
Read the part under Celestial Cosmography.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›