this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
700 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
3543 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 116 points 1 month ago (2 children)

With websites, you know it's on purpose. With dial up, it was just the technology back then

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

I’m embarrassed to admit how naive I was back in the 90s. I truly and genuinely thought that all limitations were inherently technological in nature.

Even though I knew capitalism was the enemy of humanity, I still very much naively thought that it would keep progressing because “of course it would”.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just waiting for this epic battle in my browser between YouTube and uBlock Origin to conclude before it finally loads the play button...

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When I download a youtube video with yt-dlp, one of the output lines is always

[download] Sleeping 5.00 seconds as required by the site...

I think this is hardcoded into the site at this point, especially if you don't use Chrome.

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 67 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Well it's correct behavior. Websites from the 90s should load instantly now. Any website loading longer should deliver some amazing content that was impossible in the 90s

Why do websites have to ship 12 MB of JavaScript before they even start to load? In lots of cases SPA have no benefits for the user and just make everything bloated and complex as hell and due to the insanity of the JavaScript packaging also super hard to keep safe / up to date.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People building spas for everything when literally 99% of sites on the planet would function better as a static site is infuriating. I’ve had so many arguments with devs because they will make up any thing they can to justify using react or angular or vue or whatever, instead of building a fucking static site.

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 29 points 1 month ago

One of my employeers had a multiple megabytes SPA with a shitload of dependencies (Angular) in production that was just a glorified upload form. All the heavy lifting and verification was done by the backend anyways and it was a pain to upgrade, especially with angular major updates etc.

Since we replaced it with a vanilla HTML upload form and some templating to display feedback from the backend no more maintenance was necessary and the users and testers where still happy.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I agree, here's an example of how websites should be https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

A lot of it too is 3rd party tracking scripts and garbage like Full Story that has to also load on apps

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Tbf you did experience when websites took 0.1 seconds to load also.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 month ago

That's the answer.

You have every right to be enraged if you see progress happening in reverse on purpose.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do you need so many JavaScript libraries!? I just need to know if I can afford to eat today!?

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 22 points 1 month ago

Non corpo sites I wait. Corpo site, i quit and conclude that site is broken without its ads.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I remember there was a fan made Star Trek you could download from their site and watch. For the early 00 or was very high quality.

And on our dialup internet it would literally take a whole day to download lol. We'd start the download then we'd all just leave the house to not curse the download and when we came home it was loaded.

We got broadband soon after, I went to test and I COULD SEE THE BAR MOVING ON THE DOWNLOAD

It was amazing!

I get angry at websites now that do not load in an instant. Oops.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It was Starship Exeter! I don't know if that's the old website, it's been too long and my brain is cheese. I only know the name because it was twin who was into it and twin remembered when we talked about it recently (because of the comment I made we started talking about it)

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

"Did my time waiting"

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Websites were quick back then too because they were incredibly basic. XHTML was the beginning of the downfall of mankind

[–] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Came part and parcel didn’t they? And ActiveX

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

And Java applets and flash websites, and the need to install codec packs

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago

That's because you know that it doesn't have to be that way with current technology

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'll just say remember old 240p YT buffering

[–] jon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me too, but you could pause it and it would load the whole video. Now pausing it only loads the next little bit and there is no way (probably is some way I'm not familiar with) to have it download and not buffer anymore.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Does copy/pasting youtube URLs into VLC still work?

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm still pissed to took Google almost a decade to add the 144p option so I could finally watch videos without buffering. And shortly after they finally added it my home got a faster internet connection anyways

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Of course is it a German handle. Kenn ich kenn ich

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah, because you remember that magical moment when you first got DSL or Cable Internet while the web was still built for dial up. Like any available overhead, and bandwidth gets stuffed.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For a while now pages load "at once" as if it's a single thing to load, but back in the day you could actually see pages load in parts. If things were dire you could turn off image loading, or simply click the stop loading button because the content you wanted was loaded, just not the whole page.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Some still load "in parts" . When I go to click something on IMDB, a new panel appears and moves everything down so I click the wrong thing.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago

With an adblocker, sites load faster, but some still take fucking forever.

I also remember one airline company's site used to work perfectly and was very quick back in 2010-17. One of the more recent "updates" was seemingly to make it stop working on desktop browsers - no, seriously, when trying to buy seats on a desktop browser, the fucking thing will fucking crash when it reaches the "choose your seat" page. My dad complained about it ~2 years ago. Of course the company didn't do shit, as I recently found out firsthand.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

Back in the day, you'd keep a small TV next to your computer so you have something to do while you wait for a page to load or download a 3MB file.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Running ad blockers speeds things up. They always load those first.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Tbf, a lot of that wait it all the trackers getting swatted away. Rarely is it just too much shit coming from too far away on a shitty series of nodes.

I'm not that old and honestly I don't mind if a web page takes 5 seconds to load, after that I start to wonder if they or I fucked something up. But I'm not fed up or anything, just anxious

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I stayed on BBS at home until broadband became available at my house.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even the heaviest JavaScript sites still load in under 5s. Static sites are not viable for most sites these days. Users expect responsive design, not needing to load a new page all the time.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True, as in most of them manage to show a background and loading spinner before sitting around doing fuck all for 30s. 5s used to be considered way too slow by the way.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

5s during dial up era was absolutely not considered way to slow.

[–] Damage@feddit.it -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dude looks rough to allegedly be under 40

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

Dude looks completely normal for his age, he just suffers from androgenetic alopecia which can affect people at many ages.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

He's just a balding guy with very visible pixels in his face, could be any age between 20 and like 55.