this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
234 points (90.9% liked)

Fuck AI

5654 readers
488 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This magazine is no longer legitimate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmydripzdotz456@lemmy.world 88 points 1 month ago (2 children)

FWIW, I think they pick the most influential person or persons, not the person I think is the best from the year. Hitler was person of the year and so was Trump.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly this. "AI" and the people behind it were highly newsworthy, it's not a prize and never has been.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago (6 children)

AI isn't people.

Imagine if they said that subprime credit swaps were the person of the year in 2006.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Despite the name, the title is not just granted to individuals. Pairs of people such as married couples and political opponents, classes of people, and inanimate objects have all been selected for the special year-end issue.

Wikipedia

Notable past winners include:

  • The computer
  • The endangered Earth
  • The Spirit of Ukraine
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

It's more of a branding thing I guess. It's not like the "award" is real, it's just "this is what the ruling class likes this year"

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Useful information. That said, it's probably a little more dangerous in this case because too many people are personifying LLM behavior. I don't think any people assume The Spirit of Ukraine is a sentient being, for instance.

But I concede that the people pushing AI certainly can be, especially since their influence has ruined so many lives already and is poised to ruin many more, both directly and indirectly.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

As you can see in the top right corner the person of the year title applies to the architects of AI.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Capitalist media is pure garbage.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The front page literally says: "the architects of AI" are the person of the year.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I mean I was the Time person of the year in 2006, and I was still in high school.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Every dog would be more qualified to be person of the year. 😂

[–] lemmydripzdotz456@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The title went to "The Architects of AI", not just to AI in general

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

they pick the most influential person or persons,

Celebrating fascism along the way...

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In defense of Time magazine here they did have Hitler as person of the year once. Its just the most influential person/thing not the "best".

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

they also had "you" - meaning everyone - in 2006. So anyone who was alive then is technically included.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Celebrating hitler is not a "defense". jfc.

There are plenty of people who resisted.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

I love that series so much.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hell of a way to announce you don’t understand the concept of Time Person of the Year

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's the excuse they use when later it turns out that their picks weren't that good, but overall theme is that they try to show the positive people/events.

AI is being prepared as a revolution that can have positive benefits, they are also trying to mislead people that it can think, though when you actually use it for things like software engineering you quickly learn that it is now scam than anything.

The tool is only good in negative aspects such as disinformation and surveillance.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago

It is "the architects of ai", which is a bunch of tech CEOs, so even worse.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Legally so are corporations.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, Al is short for Alphonsejamin.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 14 points 1 month ago

Yes. Time being irrelevant and stupid is only a recent phenomenon.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ITT: people taking a fake award both at face value and way too seriously.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

Seriously it's not even an honorific, it just describes the most newsworthy people from that year

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

ITT: people absorbing disinformation and fake news with zero critical faculty.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

That magazine was already irrelevant since a decade ago, I've never taken their person of the year thing serious

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Its not a good person contest. It's people who have been prominent.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

AI is definitelly the "Thing of the Year" in terms of its impact.

Doesn't mean it's a good thing though, just high impact (and impact which is going to be even higher when the bubble collapses dragging the rest of the American Economy with it).

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

wonder if mortgage lenders were person of the year in 2007

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I think it was just mortgages... but it might've said "brokers" really tiny in fine print.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

But... I'm awesome 🥺

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

It's Time ended long ago.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Cover looks like slop.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

it. never. was.

Is this real? This can't be real. Is it?...

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone here is complaining that AI isn't a person and bringing up 2006... Nobody seems to remember 1982's person of the year.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was 2 in 1982 so how about you enlighten me?

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I wasn't even born yet but I still know how to use the Internet to find out it was the computer

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

OP tell us who you would put up there instead and why

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I stopped considering it legitimate when they claimed that I was person of the year in 2006. I didn't even do anything besides post on myspace, leave youtube comments, drank vodka, and slept around.

What? It was my early 20s.....if you don't wake up five different times, in five different womens beds, where you have no clue who they are, where you are, or where your kidneys are....then you're not doing your early 20s right!

Now.....early 40s? I drink a lot of water. Did you know you should be drinking more water? Because you should be drinking more water.

load more comments
view more: next ›