this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
253 points (100.0% liked)

Murdered by Words

2325 readers
2 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Diogenes could have been a legend on 4chan.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 1 week ago

Diogenes would be the patron saint of internet memage if he was alive today.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Those words would murder harder with accessibility.


Diogenes would have been quickly banned on social media for trolling, incivility, & "arguing for arguments sake".

Classical Cynicism was all about pursuing clarity & meaning in life indifferent to its vicissitudes & free from pretenses & illusions. They held that false judgements of value caused arrogance, which caused dissatisfaction from unnatural, irrational desires[^false-value]. They argued for discovering clarity through ascetic practices free from unnatural desires through practices of shamelessness or impudence that deface the nomos of society (the laws, customs, and social conventions that people take for granted). That included flouting social conventions openly & derisively in public.

[^false-value]: especially of conventional desires (wealth, power, glory, recognition, conformity, worldly possessions)

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your suggestion would be more useful if it had more direct information on how the poster could add alt text to their post or image themselves, rather than a link to some generic w3 page about accessibility.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are a multitude of remedies, so I don't specify. All that matters is the result: web accessibility. Doesn't matter how text alternative is provided whether by

  • in post submission/edit forms, reducing image to the non-text portion, describe it in field Alt Text, provide proper text in the field Body
  • adequately filling field Alt Text
  • setting the field URL to an accessible equivalent
  • providing an accessible description in the field Title or Body
  • beginning the field Body with a link (so it's directly adjacent to image) to an accessible equivalent

or any other possibility as long as it achieves accessibility.

In general, it depends on the situation. Screenshot of social media text content: link to the source or its archival snapshot. Image of pure text: don't post that, post text instead.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago