this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
407 points (99.8% liked)

News

36994 readers
2070 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Fortunately, history has never been short on examples of how to deal with rich assholes who seek to grind the people under their heel.

All it takes is commitment, passion, basic carpentry knowledge, and a rope.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That is ridiculous.

You also need a blacksmith.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

In 21st century America, our solutions are handled with gunpowder and lead.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Gallows are too slow. The guillotine was introduced precisely because you couldn't effectively and cleanly eliminate problems fast enough.

But I can admit I misread it and thought we were talking guillotines and not gallows at first.

I'll back off in the interest of not seeing the revolution get bogged down in infighting over WHICH tool we use to execute the capitalists.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago

I prefer the above mentioned solution, which requires some level of smithing skills, primarily because of the increased throughput bandwidth.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

now we just need a way to track specific billionaires

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How about we carve a Swastika into the foreheads of every MAGA?

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I want my scalps!!!

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 33 points 3 months ago
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

Who's going to keep the economy running when average people are completely out of money? Who is going to buy new things, when everything becomes too expensive?

These wealthy assholes are due for a rude awakening. Preferably with a sharpened edge that drops from a fixed height.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

When you own everything money stops being a factor.

Currently, money to them is just a vehicle for power. That's why people like Musk will balk at a fine that's like $2 to them. It's not about the money, it's about a challenge to their power.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

It is interesting to note that I typically but a lot of computer components for my hobby. I have bought ant new ones in a long time... They're just too expensive now.

AI is doing this the most, though it was Crypto previously. Just a slurry of shit nobody wants pretty much, but enough avid people believe they do want it.

It's all bullshit, and it's bad for us. If the bullshit goes away, there could be a great little boom, though.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

There are always enough to buy all the shiny things. Even better if lesser people buy more stuff. Hence why all the food price hikes work so well. Those few customers they lost are well made up for with double prices. This even covers those who are actively boycotting.

As for the awakening. Nah. How should that ever happen? Sheeples are gonna sheep harder, as they have less and less time to ponder about things and are more and more consumed by work and just surviving. Those few inbetween? With a bit of freedom and money but also the POV to see how bad it all is AND the motivation to actually do something about it? Nah. I don't share that optimistic foresight. Sadly though, I'd like to believe in a better future.

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They are currently changing the system so they pay themselves and don’t need us.

It’s kind of terrifying

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The economy of power is all that matters. Once we leave the currency economy we'll be well into neofeudalism. "No money for food? Just sign on the dotted line and the company will cover your meals..."

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

AI will, if they have their way, and we'll be left to die. They've already shown their hands. This is clearly their plan.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We need socialism, and fast.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It will trickle down any day now...

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

I've been feeling the trickle for decades now. It's not money, guys...

[–] decended_being@midwest.social 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's about $23,000 per person in the US (estimating 350m population). That's life changing money for most.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you push that to the bottom 70-80% and not the top % brackets who probably aren’t in as bad a spot it probably does even better.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, except purchasing power would decrease significantly if wealth was distributed that way.

I know it's counter-intuitive but the real problem with billionaires isn't that the poor are destitute. The problem is that economic power is political power, and oligarchies use institutionalized violence to keep the poor destitute forever.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don’t think so as far as purchasing power in this limited case. This assumes capitalists would adjust pricing to soak up the cash. Giving people ~$30k would be almost guaranteed go to bills and food, maybe some would buy a used car or something. Few would save the money. This hypothetical isn’t an annuity, so hiking prices would likely be local and predatory. Scumbag landlords hiking rent. Debt collector vultures. Shitty used car businesses hiking prices. All the usual scumbags preying on the poor. I don’t want to get into the weeds too deeply, but the buying power issue would absolutely be a problem were we to implement something like UBI because businesses like apartments would absolutely jack up the prices and wreck the buying power of the lower income brackets.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Except that every time we print money for some bailout or crooked public works project that never materializes we further devalue the currency and all that money goes to the rich. Simply by being so insanely rich they're already causing a decrease in everyone elses wealth.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

We need to adopt using the term obscene to describe billionaires. And treat them like pariahs.

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The rich get richer and the rest starve.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Survival Of The Fittest. I'm pretty sure Jeezus said it, and shit.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Gee, would've been a shame if all that money was given to all the poor and pious in the world (including the US). Seriously!

load more comments
view more: next ›