this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
-8 points (33.3% liked)

Fediverse

22799 readers
59 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy claims decentralization, but once you join a community on one instance you’re still subject to that instance’s rules and moderators. Being banned from c/community@instance still means you can’t post there unless you make a new account elsewhere. That isn’t real decentralization, it’s just fragmentation where every instance ends up replicating the same centralized moderation power in a different place. Federated instances don’t stop this, they just scatter the same problem across multiple servers. If the goal is escaping centralized control, the reality is you still get banned, silenced, or cut off the same way, the only “freedom” is signing up somewhere else. That’s not decentralization in practice, it’s decentralization in name only.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

I dunno, this screams of “I want to be an asshole with no way for anyone to stop me.”

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 17 points 5 days ago

The reality is that an instance or community with rules that are too strict simply dies or never becomes popular in the first place since anyone can re-create a community on another server. People have the freedom to choose the "best" instance or even hang out on the strict one if they so desire.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nah I think it works well. If an instance sucks, it's easy enough to use a similar community on a different instance, people will move. If an instance dies, it's easy enough to move the community to a different instance. We've seen it happen already. Way better than Reddit.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

Describe what you think decentralization is in practice.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand federation. Its like bars. with reddit you only have bars owned by one place. here you have all sorts of independent one. if you don't fit in at community@instance for whatever reason, maybe the mods are powertripping. Well you can go to community@otherinstance and talk on the subject. Just like if the bouncers at some place won't let you in you can find one that is more chill. Hey man sometimes just someone who hangs out at a place turns you off. Its great to have options.

[–] PumpkinDrama@reddthat.com -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

That just causes fragmentation, in Reddit all the community is in a single place, that's what made it popular otherwise we could go back to using forums. Each person chooses a different one and then we end up with dozens of barely active forums.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

well us just having a alternative keeps it being in one place and then there are other things like slashdot or any other competitors. piefed does a good job of grouping things (kinda comics seems to be split in at least two topics). Personally I don't want to be in one place with everyone on the planet as I don't like many people. I want a place with somewhat like minded folks just like I would with a club or bar or whatever.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

go back to using forums.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Moderation is good. Decentralization isn't the absence of moderation.

Just go to communities where you agree with the rules.

[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think Lemmy ever claimed they're decentralised, because it has a specific meaning that sets itself apart from being federated, and Lemmy certainly isn't decentralised.

The whole freedom of federation comes from the fact that if you don't like something, you're free to set up your own stuff and do it there. In practice, it doesn't work that well as advertised especially for something like Lemmy, which creates an additional layer of isolation (communities) within itself, but it requires a large group of people in a single community to work. I think Lemmy needs a way to '"merge" communities across instance.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

decentralization doesn't have a particularly specific meaning. Federation absolutely qualifies for having a certain degree of it. You can be more or less decentralized ranging from completely monolithic to fully p2p. Then there are related properties like the ability to migrate or anonymity.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago

Some instances are themed, some are generalist. Because multiple communities can exist around the same topic/theme, the user based ultimately ends up in a community hosted on an instance that fits their needs, because if it didn't, they would simply move elsewhere.

Which ultimately means that if you get instance banned from an instance that hosts a community you want to use, there's a good chance you weren't going to last long in that community anyway...

[–] ragica@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

Your freedom is in the (theoretical) ability run your own instance and communities on it if you disagree with or have been banned from other instances. And your instance can federate with whomever will allow it.

Communities also want freedom -- to be organized and run the way they want to be, and to be free from being hijacked or shit on uncontrollably by randos, bad actors, or even (defined by themselves) undesirables.

It's not perfect. But you sometimes have to consider a bigger picture than just your personal freedom, to make things a free as practically possible.