188
Rare Texas W
Yeah.... where's the evil?
Only affluent, white owners get federal assistance?
You must discriminate against owners who don't get federal assistance?
Just kidding, discriminate away?
It's Texas, who knows? ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯
Can we just have home owners associations banned altogether?
Based.
My wife and I went out of our way to buy a non-HOA house, cause fuck’em its my property.
They are valuable in shared community situations, such as townhouse communities (wherein one home abutts another) and condos. In these situations, there are shared elements which need to be funded and enforced somehow (would you want to live in a townhouse where your neighbor has rats? Would you want to live in a condo with no funding to maintain the building?).
I'd be pretty okay with banning them outside of those sorts of circumstances.
We have condo boards in Canada. I think HOAs have way more power than condo boards.
They definitely do. HOAs can literally foreclose on people's homes even if they're just a few hundred dollars behind in their payments.
Seems like a fairly convenient political punching bag if you want to score some easy wins. I feel like it's underutilized. Both parties (in the us where HoAs are actually common) could use this strategy pretty easily.
This is a victory against which essentially appears to be Redlining 2.0.
Very surprising coming out of Texas.
Having acknowledged the positive in this, the cynic in me can't help but read in between the lines of how this maybe reveals what revenue streams in Texas wield power versus what doesn't.
Ban water breaks for construction workers = lucrative contracts for my industry cronies.
Ban Section 8 discrimination by HOAs = not an industry that can make me money as a politician, so screw them.
not an industry that can make me money as a politician
But home rentals are. I know here in Canada, many federal politicians are landlords. It seems to be the thing that either supports them in running for office in the first place, or what they do spend their MP's salary on once elected.
Yes, which is why I think this law passed because home renting (being a landlord) is one iteration of a small business and the pursuit of capital. Hence HOA isn't the money-making industry.
I think because of how HOAs operate in the U.S., there is rarely ever any collaboration between them as a lobbying force versus how landlords could potentially band together to influence policy. Even in this story, it's realtors as a collective showing support for banning this kind of discrimination, not other HOAs defending the practice.
Usually the people who are involved in HOAs aren't paid, or they're paid something nominal. The only people who get rich from HOAs are the treasurers and they get rich because they embezzle the HOA funds. Also, although all the officers of HOAs own homes, they're not all landlords. So the HOA as an organization may countermand what an homeowner within the HOA wants to do with their home, such as rent it out to Section 8 recipients.
Most HOAs in the U.S. are characterized as being controlling and troublesome to deal with by homeowners within the HOA, and are overwhelming staffed (voted in) by the most bored busybodies who want to tell you how to live your life.
Companies need cheap government sunbsidized labor to be able to live somewhat near
That sounds awfully liberal of you, Texas.
"That proved too hostile to low-income tenants even for the Republican-dominated Texas Legislature."
I didn't think such a limit even existed for Republicans. Especially considering they're usually the WASP types that want to keep minorities out of their neighborhoods.
It’s about $$. Don’t stand between corporate landlords and their opportunity to make a profit.
They very occasionally can surprise you. Our ultra-Republican legislature in Indiana also got rid of textbook fees for grade schoolers.
The New York ban just got rolled by the supreme court. We'll see how long Texas lasts. Either it will get rolled too, or basically be unenforceable.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
188 points (99.5% liked)
politics
19159 readers
4543 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS