this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
284 points (99.3% liked)

World News

51431 readers
2514 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The rapper in punk duo Bob Vylan will not face further action over his "death death to the IDF" chants at Glastonbury Festival, police have said.

Rapper Bobby Vylan, real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster led crowds on the festival's West Holts Stage in the chants about the Israel Defence Forces during the group's performance in June.

Avon and Somerset Police said a criminal investigation was under way shortly afterwards, with a senior detective appointed to lead the investigation.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

Now will BA pay Louis Theroux for his podcast?

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Bob Vylan is Punk! Death to the idf

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 13 points 18 hours ago

Death to the IDF 🎶

[–] aesviation@lemmings.world 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Any reason why this group of people gets so much more protection than others?

We can criticize just about anyone, but when it comes to Jews it's off-limits.

I think that's kind of unfair and bullshit. They shouldn't have this power over us.

No. This is about the Israeli Defense Force.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because 6 million of them were exterminated in WWII and they have faced centuries of blood libel and hatred.

Don't confuse hating what Israel is doing with attacking "the Jews". Totally different topic.

[–] aesviation@lemmings.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

But it's okay to say christianity is a death cult?

Also, I disagree that Jews are immune to criticism for the reasons you stated. Literally every group of people has faced persecution throughout history, including christians. That doesn't mean we can't criticize them.

Unfortunately, you're probably going to ban me just because of my previous passage, proving my point.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Nobody should be immune to criticism. But you should criticise people for their actions, not their being. I hate the Israeli state, not because they're Jewish, but because of their actions in gaza.

Unfortunately, you're probably going to ban me just because of my previous passage, proving my point.

Oh stop predicting a not yet existing victim state.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

It's not about protecting jews it is about protecting zionists. There are anti israel jews that are forcefully arrested

[–] aesviation@lemmings.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Got this lovely message shortly after making this comment:

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Make sure you report that PM.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

I agree with you

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What I love is the wording of this. They said the case wasn't moving forwards because of a "lack of evidence". Not that there was no crime committed.

The whole thing was filmed and broadcast on TV. Exactly what extra evidence was needed to bring this to court?

Not a crime and should never have been treated as one. Complete waste of time and money.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 19 hours ago

They said the case wasn’t moving forwards because of a “lack of evidence”. Not that there was no crime committed.

Yeah, as you pointed out, the chant was done in a public place. So "lack of evidence" is a prosecutorial euphemism for "we have no case."

[–] chillhelm@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not familiar with the specific law in question, but for a lot of laws intent and knowledge at the time of crime matter. Eg the difference between manslaughter and murder is a difference in attitude.

I could plausibly see that in this case there is not enough evidence to determine what the mind set was, while the physical action still undoubtedly took place.

Eg in Germany showing the Nazi salute or displaying a swastika are illegal, except for artistic or educational purposes. A case could be constructed in which a defendants intent when showing either the gesture or the symbol could not be clearly deduced. This not enough evidence exists wether a crime was committed, even though the physical action that would constitute the crime undoubtedly happened.

Could be a similar thing is at play here.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago

Maybe, but I think the intent was quite clear here. Political statement of contempt towards the IDF. There was no sarcasm or irony. It wasn't part of a song. He just led the crowd in a chant.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

DEATH DEATH TO THE IDF

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Me: Prosecute? Speech? You can't, get fucked.

Glastonbury

Oh that sounds bri*ish as hell, makes sense, didn't have a chant starting loicense.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Glastonbury is our (bi?)annual Woodstock-like music festival.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ex police officer arrested (though not prosecuted, still held for more than a month) because he quoted Trump after Charlie Kirk got involved with a projectile.

https://www.thefire.org/news/he-spent-37-days-jail-facebook-post-now-fire-has-his-back

(First link when I googled, know nothing of the site or org)

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

At least in the US, that is illegal to do. Now good luck prosecuting that until a lot of police reform happens because that's a whole issue as well, but that is illegal. Over there he'd be convicted and sentenced on top of being held.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Over there he’d be convicted and sentenced on top of being held.

I'm "over there" and no, the chance of being convicted of that act here is almost nil.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

And yet, it happens.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would they prosecute him for a change? WTF is happening with the world.

It is illegal to hurt a right winger's feelings.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

WTF is happening with the world

I think it's the internet. Overexposure of information and stimulus about every conceivable issue, billions of voices and opinions and stray, intrusive thoughts fed directly into our eyeballs 24/7. It's making people broadly lose track of reality or not really understand what's actually important anymore.

This has had the effect of allowing the worst voices to gain power because those voices get shared more, both out of pushback and condemnation as well as support from niche groups.

Basically the information age is destabilizing society, the last couple decades have accelerated this process as capitalism has hijacked the entire system to algorithm advertising directly into your skull, so now attention spans are monetized and as a result, are being shortened further and further by competing forces.

And it's been seen over and over in history that times of uncertainty and destabilization often come with a broad retreat from the social contract and a breed a large-scale attraction to authoritarianism and selfish motivations. Likely a survival response buried deep inside us as a way to survive famine and hard times.

Don't worry, one way or another, it will end.

Good obvious right choice for ounce.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Good to see for Bob.