this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

movies

2319 readers
122 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wow, that actually looks like shit. The gold pops too hard and looks like a shitty photoshop, and the mane thing on the helmet clearly has machine pressed bristles that are in an obvious grid pattern like a fucking cleaning brush...

Who ever greenlit those props, let alone that cover, needs to be fired.

[–] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Saw a tiktok (grain of salt) saying Nolan originally hired experts in ancient Greek armor and fired them to go with a different look. We're about to see the most generic looking "greek" armor of all time.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago

The most generic looking Greek armour *with dangling golden spines attached

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not a historian of ancient Greek armature, but if I were to fasten a bunch of horse hair to stand up like a Mohawk on top of a helmet chances are I would drill a bunch of holes of roughly .5 cm diameter systematically throughout hardwood base and stuff each hole as full of hairs as I possibly could. It would probably come out looking something like a shoe brush.

Of course, I have no idea how they were made; again, I'm not a historian. I just don't see what is so obviously machine made here. On the contrary, I would be surprised if this helmet wasn't in fact custom made by hand by the costume department. It would be very unlike Nolan to buy a mass produced Halloween costume from China.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No, it really wouldn't. Many, many, many craftsmen try to produce consistent, even products by hand. Every single time, when they don't use a jig and measure a hundred times over, it comes out far, far less even than modern machines.

In addition, I seriously doubt horse hairs/etc would across hundreds of them all be perfectly straight and consistent to the point where the binding pattern would be clearly visible at the tips. Even if they were, I'd bet crafting it by hand would disturb them enough to floof it out a bit by the end of production.

In either case, it's very silly to make something look so obviously modern, even if it were possible to make back then. They're selling an image, and this image screams "modern production".

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, fair point about the horse hairs at least. But I also can't help but feel like people might have had all kinds of strange ideas about how they want things to look in the past, and a lot of it would probably surprise us if we had the chance to go back and check. So I still struggle to see things like this as genuinely upsetting. Had it been a proper blunder like imitating a roman armour or something I would have agreed much more, but taking some creative license with what ancient Greece looked like I feel should be expected.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think this poster would look better without the “golden spine” part. Still looking forward to this movie.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago

I feel like it would be pretty bland and uninteresting without it. The golden spine makes it interesting. Presumably it might make sense after watching the movie.

I can't wait for people to freak out about the lack of historical accuracy, as they always do whenever they see anything at all in a movie set before 1850.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 12 points 4 days ago

Yeah... I don't know what I'm looking at. Is that a hair braid that looks like a spine?

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This poster does not inspire confidence. That helmet and the overall dull tone is not great. Still, I wouldn't write off a Nolan movie based on the poster alone.

No, I'd write them off based on the director.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 4 days ago

Is it AI slop? What's going on with that spine thing?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Is one of those actors going to stand naked on a table while mowing down all in attendance with a bow and arrows? Does the dog know it's him!?

They don’t have a role for Florence Pugh?

Disappoint.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Its a movie about a man stranded far away from home. Matt Damon was the logical choice of course.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago

Not talking about Matt Damon here really. Holland, Pattinson and Zendaya are the weird ones.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree. A lot of the actors in this movie are the type that prevent me from fully immersing into this type of film because their faces are so recognizable.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago

I just dont think a few of them are that good actors either to be honest. Nolan films usually have damn good casting too.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Looks way too clean. If it was like, cyber greek or someone in Death Stranding yeah sure I'd see it. But if dudes been in the field at all its gonna have dirt, dings, scratches, etc.