this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
119 points (97.6% liked)

politics

22910 readers
81 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new peak of anti-communist repression is unfolding in today's Russia. On 25 November 2025, during the closing hearings at the Central Military Court of the Yekaterinburg District, the prosecution demanded 20 to 24 years in a high-security penal colony for the members of a Marxist study circle in the city of Ufa, accusing them of “terrorism” and “conspiracy to overthrow the government.”

The five defendants, detained since February 2022, reject all charges and have reported torture during their interrogation. Their legal ordeal has now lasted nearly two years, with the first court session held in December 2023.

The Marxist group had been active since 2016. One of its later members, Sergei Shapozhnikov — a former fighter in the armed formations of the so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic” who subsequently received Russian citizenship — informed the FSB that the circle was supposedly “waiting for an unstable situation to seize power and kill police officers and politicians.” No material evidence was ever provided to support these claims.

Instead, the court instructed a panel of “experts” to evaluate whether the group’s lectures and reading material could be considered “terrorist activity.” Their conclusion reveals the true nature of the prosecution: they declared Lenin’s foundational work “State and Revolution” to be a “terrorist manual.”

The report goes so far as to argue that discussing socialist revolution, Soviets and workers’ power constitutes proof of extremism, asserting that the very “lexicographical meaning of the word ‘revolution’” demonstrates a violent intention to overthrow the state. On the basis of this pseudo-scientific interpretation, the prosecution now demands multi-decade prison sentences.

This judicial persecution is unfolding in the same Russia whose leadership claims to be conducting an “anti-fascist war,” and which every 9 May attempts to appropriate the legacy of the Anti-Fascist Victory of the USSR over Nazism — a victory achieved by the socialist system that today is being criminalised.

The scandal has already provoked international condemnation. On 10 March 2025, the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) sent an official protest letter to the Russian Embassy in Athens, denouncing this blatantly political and anti-democratic prosecution.

What is at stake here goes far beyond five militants in Ufa. It is the criminalisation of Marxist theory itself — and the attempt to turn Lenin’s “State and Revolution” from a historical and political work into an “act of terrorism.” The repression of revolutionary ideas is always a sign of a system in crisis. And no prison sentence has ever succeeded in stopping them.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 67 points 3 days ago (1 children)

russia-cool

Really puts the CRITICAL in critical support. Bonapartist state be damned.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

bonapartist is a bit generous tbh

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah... this would be typical dictaboug shenanigans in the West. Anyways, what to call it?

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right, as long as it fends off NATO and US hegemony.

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 39 points 3 days ago

And libs will still call Russia "communist"

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

aren't there like, still statues of Lenin and Stalin and shit

[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago

It's more for nostalgia than anything else. Putin is an anti communist handpicked by Yeltsin and Bill Clinton.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago

The main opposition is the Communist Party.

[–] Conselheiro@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 3 days ago

Lots of people calling it "just a book club" in the thread. Apparently they were actually doing vanguard party work (read source with grain of salt) and at least one was a Communist Party member. If you aren't organised yourself you should refrain from belittling others' praxis.

Also keep in mind that they were arrested in March 2022, right after the beginning of the SMO. I can't find much reliable information on them in English (the source above has some inaccuracies and mentions an unnamed escapee writing inexistent articles), so I can't really tell if the accusations hold water.

But communists getting arrested in bourgeois republics during times of war should surprise nobody. They could possibly be considering revolutionary defeatism as a tactic. Either way, the criminal case seems to hinge way more on the (maybe planted) weapons than a book that's nowhere near illegal.

Either way, here's a long article in Russian. I can't read it, and auto translation hinders critical analysis, but might be useful if anyone here can dissect it. A lot of the wording is suspect and this newspaper is a BBC partner.

https://zona.media/article/2022/04/15/ufa

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago
[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I would be curious to know if this really was a revolutionary cell with concrete plans.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 48 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Doubt they had concrete plans. Like, almost every single communist will tell you the "plan" is to wait for revolutionary conditions and be ready to seize the moment. That's literally all socialists that have read theory. All reading groups. All mildly curious people.

Nothing about it sounds like anything other than a few people reading together and discussing the basic foundational stuff.

This is actually very concerning because if Russia goes down the path of criminalising Lenin's content then European lawmakers will seize upon that to do the same saying "Even Russia itself recognises this content as terrorist and they know communism" blah blah blah.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is actually very concerning because if Russia goes down the path of criminalising Lenin's content then European lawmakers will seize upon that to do the same saying "Even Russia itself recognises this content as terrorist and they know communism" blah blah blah.

No this is 4D chess by Putin. Knowing Europe has lost its mind and opposes anything Russia does by reflex, he's trying to get Lenin to be put in European school curricula to "own the barbaric Russians"

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is an idiotic comment.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am kidding, Putin is not some cryptocommunist and even if he was this would be an absolutely terrible idea, and even if it worked they'd sanitise Lenin like MLK in the Great Satan. Lenin in fact writes about this exact phenomenon:

What is now happening to Marx’s theory has, in the course of history, happened repeatedly to the theories of revolutionary thinkers and leaders of oppressed classes fighting for emancipation. During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.

Per https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch01.htm

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Idiots reading your remark do not read this.

it's straight up the 4chan internet hate machine shit again.

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I like to think there's no idiots reading my remark because we're a communist shitposting forum on the internet. It's not the type of thing I'd say if I was like talking in a public debate or something, but absolutely would joking amongst friends, and I like to think the vibe we have here is far more the latter than the former.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

i think it's sarcastic
tbh this is why tone markers are useful

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 29 points 3 days ago

It's definitely sarcastic, people don't use "4D chess" as a serious point.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe, but it's either Schrödinger's joke or irony poisoned or whatever. It covers for horrible beliefs or is used as ammunition against movements.

It's a ridiculous and harmful thing to say

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What exactly is it harming and how?

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net -3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

4Chan brain debatelord nonsense. touch grass

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 3 days ago

touch grass

"I want to debatewin but can't unless you leave"

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No u lmao gottem

Chill fam we shitpost from time to time you're gonna have to learn to appreciate that.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Lol cope, and lol @ the idea that 4chan is where debatelords live, that's reddit dumbass

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doubt they had concrete plans. Like, almost every single communist will tell you the "plan" is to wait for revolutionary conditions and be ready to seize the moment. That's literally all socialists that have read theory. All reading groups. All mildly curious people.

another check in the "too much reading is ruinous" box for me, heh

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Organizing, agitating, and seizing the moment when conditions are right is the correct plan. The incorrect plan would be adventurism.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

yeah but okay "the right moment" all relies on someone else to be doing the adventurism because "the moment" can't be gauged without weighing the public response to adventurism i.e. seeing how everyone was fucking okay with Luigi

otherwise you're just repeating a mantra doing nothing until nothing happens, forever, uhhh like what's fucking been happening

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

yeah but okay "the right moment" all relies on someone else to be doing the adventurism because "the moment" can't be gauged without weighing the public response to adventurism i.e. seeing how everyone was fucking okay with Luigi

Yeah, random acts of violence (and the public response) are one indicator of the state of things. Hardly the only one, though. They are not, however, (generally) revolutionary acts.

otherwise you're just repeating a mantra doing nothing until nothing happens, forever, uhhh like what's fucking been happening

I did say "organizing" and "agitating". If someone's "organizing" is doing nothing, then they're doing it wrong.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, random acts of violence (and the public response) are one indicator of the state of things. Hardly the only one, though. They are not, however, (generally) revolutionary acts.

I think they can move the needle in the direction of revolution. No doubt that people support violence now more than they did before luigi, and there's no doubt that supporting violence is a prerequisite for a violent revolution.

They can also move the needle the other direction too though.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Agreed, but so do a many things which also aren't revolutionary acts. Revolutionaries should be organized and ready to act, not committing sporadic acts of violence with no clear, organized goal.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I just think all the organizing in the u.s. so far has amounted to nothing and will amount to nothing, mostly because previous revolutions and their antecedent supporters had, like, the ability to rob a bank and retreat into the caucuses or whatever, or to kill some landlords and not just get bombed to oblivion. Everything today is live on the internet with a billion cops ready to be imported to do domestic war crime. Idk what the fucking solution to that is but i hope i live longer than capitalism, that is the truest wish in the deepest part of my bones

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I just think all the organizing in the u.s. so far has amounted to nothing and will amount to nothing

I wouldn't say nothing, but I understand the sentiment that the US left has (and especially is) not been as effective as we'd (leftists in general) all like.

What organizers in the US need to do (IMO) is mainly take actions which help remove the boot from the neck of the third world. Once those imperial profits dry up, revolution in the US will become inevitable. Repression can do a lot, but it can't un-destroy an economy for which the basis no longer exists.

Idk what the fucking solution to that is but i hope i live longer than capitalism, that is the truest wish in the deepest part of my bones

Me too, comrade.

[–] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

I suspect you're right, but it would be interesting if it turns out they were actually an embryonic weatherman group.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, it was a honeypot by a Ukranian nazi who switched sides.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Google translated:

"I already sensed something was wrong back then," Marat Ageyev agrees. "Rodnik [Sergei] started to bother me. He acted like a provocateur, while remaining aloof. For example, he never spoke on camera, but he encouraged everyone to appear on video. He always had different phone numbers. I started searching for information about him online and learned that Ukraine had put him on the wanted list, he'd been arrested in Russia, but then released. It all seemed very suspicious to me. So I left the group ."

https://zona.media/article/2022/04/15/ufa

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think you're right. It looks like their use of grenades has a lot to do with it as well.

I'd be interested in seeing a primary source for the claim that Russia declared State and Revolution a terrorist manual. Has it been pulled from every bookstore in the country? I would expect that to be the case if the claim is true.

[–] Tychoxii@hexbear.net 32 points 3 days ago
[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In this case it would be FSSB.

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

Fuck! That’s good!

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

Should've studied Ilyin, Dugin and other state-endorsed ~~national~~ socialists. Rookie mistake!